以这首关于创造力的华尔兹为例:工科学生的观念

P. Catarino, M. Nascimento, Eva Morais, Helena Silva, R. Payan-Carreira
{"title":"以这首关于创造力的华尔兹为例:工科学生的观念","authors":"P. Catarino, M. Nascimento, Eva Morais, Helena Silva, R. Payan-Carreira","doi":"10.1109/CISPEE.2016.7777735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The definition of creativity is not simple, because there are different conceptions, which are also in constant changing. This paper presents a study on the conceptions of creativity in students of the first year of university, in the engineering area. This study considered the answers of 67 undergraduates originating from four different courses to an open question available online on Google Drive - “What is creativity?”. Data were collected in the first semester of the 2014/2015 among students at a Portuguese university in the Linear Algebra program. The analysis of the students' answers focused on the content analysis using the categories of Vernon's definition of creativity; we considered the variables gender and undergraduate courses into the analysis. The results show that gender and the undergraduate courses were independent from the analyzed group categories. However, the descriptive analysis by gender showed that the predominant group was the implicit group category (using the terms creation, imagination, and originality) while in the undergraduate course it prevailed the explicit group category (using the terms inventions, innovations and thinking). This exploratory study leaves clues on the approach to other definitions and constructs of creativity, as well as their implementation for teaching in higher education.","PeriodicalId":309144,"journal":{"name":"2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE)","volume":"71 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Take this Waltz on creativity: The engineering students' conceptions\",\"authors\":\"P. Catarino, M. Nascimento, Eva Morais, Helena Silva, R. Payan-Carreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CISPEE.2016.7777735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The definition of creativity is not simple, because there are different conceptions, which are also in constant changing. This paper presents a study on the conceptions of creativity in students of the first year of university, in the engineering area. This study considered the answers of 67 undergraduates originating from four different courses to an open question available online on Google Drive - “What is creativity?”. Data were collected in the first semester of the 2014/2015 among students at a Portuguese university in the Linear Algebra program. The analysis of the students' answers focused on the content analysis using the categories of Vernon's definition of creativity; we considered the variables gender and undergraduate courses into the analysis. The results show that gender and the undergraduate courses were independent from the analyzed group categories. However, the descriptive analysis by gender showed that the predominant group was the implicit group category (using the terms creation, imagination, and originality) while in the undergraduate course it prevailed the explicit group category (using the terms inventions, innovations and thinking). This exploratory study leaves clues on the approach to other definitions and constructs of creativity, as well as their implementation for teaching in higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE)\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISPEE.2016.7777735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISPEE.2016.7777735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

创造力的定义并不简单,因为有不同的概念,这些概念也在不断变化。本文对工科大学一年级学生的创造性观念进行了研究。这项研究考虑了来自四门不同课程的67名本科生对谷歌硬盘上一个开放式问题的回答——“什么是创造力?”数据收集于2014/2015学年的第一学期,对象是葡萄牙一所大学线性代数专业的学生。对学生回答的分析侧重于运用弗农对创造力定义的范畴进行内容分析;我们在分析中考虑了变量性别和本科课程。结果表明,性别和本科课程与分析的群体类别无关。然而,性别的描述性分析表明,显性群体(发明、创新和思维)在本科阶段占主导地位,隐性群体(创造、想象和创意)占主导地位。这一探索性研究为探索创造力的其他定义和结构及其在高等教育教学中的实施提供了线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Take this Waltz on creativity: The engineering students' conceptions
The definition of creativity is not simple, because there are different conceptions, which are also in constant changing. This paper presents a study on the conceptions of creativity in students of the first year of university, in the engineering area. This study considered the answers of 67 undergraduates originating from four different courses to an open question available online on Google Drive - “What is creativity?”. Data were collected in the first semester of the 2014/2015 among students at a Portuguese university in the Linear Algebra program. The analysis of the students' answers focused on the content analysis using the categories of Vernon's definition of creativity; we considered the variables gender and undergraduate courses into the analysis. The results show that gender and the undergraduate courses were independent from the analyzed group categories. However, the descriptive analysis by gender showed that the predominant group was the implicit group category (using the terms creation, imagination, and originality) while in the undergraduate course it prevailed the explicit group category (using the terms inventions, innovations and thinking). This exploratory study leaves clues on the approach to other definitions and constructs of creativity, as well as their implementation for teaching in higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信