社会接近、道德义务和知识忠诚:Muḥyī al- d n al- nawaw (d. 676/1277)和Badr al- d n Ibn jamul - al (d. 733/1333)对伊本al的Muqaddima -Ṣalāḥ (d. 643/1245)的评论

{"title":"社会接近、道德义务和知识忠诚:Muḥyī al- d<e:1> n al- nawaw (d. 676/1277)和Badr al- d<e:1> n Ibn jamul - al (d. 733/1333)对伊本al的Muqaddima -Ṣalāḥ (d. 643/1245)的评论","authors":"","doi":"10.5840/islamicphil2023149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Muqaddima of Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ on the science of Ḥadīth has attracted a large and complex commentary tradition. Its complexity lies in the fact that certain sorts of commentarial literature, such as abridgments (sg. mukhtaṣar), commentaries (sg. sharḥ), critical commentaries (nukat), and versifications (sg. manẓūma), were produced with a different focus across scholarly networks, locations, and time. Moreover, depending on the orientation of the scholarly networks that a commenta­tor belonged to, the commentaries show different degrees of intellectual loyalty to the base text. Some support the argu­ments of the base text and follow its structure closely, while others refute ideas and restructure the content. This article centers its analysis on two examples of commentaries on the Muqaddima. Its leading hypothesis is that social proximity or distance to Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ and the network of his close students determines the degree of moral obligation and intellectual loyalty to Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ and the base text. The commentaries of al-Nawawī and Ibn Jamāʿa demonstrate this relation clearly.","PeriodicalId":301506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Philosophy","volume":"517 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Proximity, Moral Obligation, and Intellectual Loyalty: The Commentaries of Muḥyī al-Dīn al-Nawawī (d. 676/1277) and Badr al-Dīn Ibn Jamāʿa (d. 733/1333) on the Muqaddima of Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ (d. 643/1245)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/islamicphil2023149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Muqaddima of Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ on the science of Ḥadīth has attracted a large and complex commentary tradition. Its complexity lies in the fact that certain sorts of commentarial literature, such as abridgments (sg. mukhtaṣar), commentaries (sg. sharḥ), critical commentaries (nukat), and versifications (sg. manẓūma), were produced with a different focus across scholarly networks, locations, and time. Moreover, depending on the orientation of the scholarly networks that a commenta­tor belonged to, the commentaries show different degrees of intellectual loyalty to the base text. Some support the argu­ments of the base text and follow its structure closely, while others refute ideas and restructure the content. This article centers its analysis on two examples of commentaries on the Muqaddima. Its leading hypothesis is that social proximity or distance to Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ and the network of his close students determines the degree of moral obligation and intellectual loyalty to Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ and the base text. The commentaries of al-Nawawī and Ibn Jamāʿa demonstrate this relation clearly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Islamic Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"517 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Islamic Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/islamicphil2023149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/islamicphil2023149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伊本·阿尔·-Ṣalāḥ关于Ḥadīth科学的穆卡迪马吸引了一个庞大而复杂的评论传统。它的复杂性在于,某些类型的评注文学,如删节(如《古兰经》)。Mukhtaṣar),评论(sg。评论(nukat)和译本(sg。Manẓūma),在不同的学术网络、地点和时间产生了不同的焦点。此外,根据评注者所属的学术网络的取向,评注者对基本文本表现出不同程度的智力忠诚。一些人支持基本文本的论点并密切关注其结构,而另一些人则反驳观点并重构内容。本文以两篇对卡扎菲的评论文章为例进行分析。它的主要假设是,与伊本·阿尔-Ṣalāḥ及其亲密学生的社会接近或距离决定了对伊本·阿尔-Ṣalāḥ和基本文本的道德义务和智力忠诚的程度。al- nawaw和伊本·贾玛伊的注释清楚地说明了这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Proximity, Moral Obligation, and Intellectual Loyalty: The Commentaries of Muḥyī al-Dīn al-Nawawī (d. 676/1277) and Badr al-Dīn Ibn Jamāʿa (d. 733/1333) on the Muqaddima of Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ (d. 643/1245)
The Muqaddima of Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ on the science of Ḥadīth has attracted a large and complex commentary tradition. Its complexity lies in the fact that certain sorts of commentarial literature, such as abridgments (sg. mukhtaṣar), commentaries (sg. sharḥ), critical commentaries (nukat), and versifications (sg. manẓūma), were produced with a different focus across scholarly networks, locations, and time. Moreover, depending on the orientation of the scholarly networks that a commenta­tor belonged to, the commentaries show different degrees of intellectual loyalty to the base text. Some support the argu­ments of the base text and follow its structure closely, while others refute ideas and restructure the content. This article centers its analysis on two examples of commentaries on the Muqaddima. Its leading hypothesis is that social proximity or distance to Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ and the network of his close students determines the degree of moral obligation and intellectual loyalty to Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ and the base text. The commentaries of al-Nawawī and Ibn Jamāʿa demonstrate this relation clearly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信