投影加权与重建方法在离心平板锥束CT分析图像重建中的比较

A. T. Amin, Ashrani Aizzuddin Abd. Rahni, S. S. Mokri, Rozilawati Ahmad
{"title":"投影加权与重建方法在离心平板锥束CT分析图像重建中的比较","authors":"A. T. Amin, Ashrani Aizzuddin Abd. Rahni, S. S. Mokri, Rozilawati Ahmad","doi":"10.1109/ICBAPS.2018.8527405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging, a half-fan (HF) mode acquisition can be used to obtain a larger field-of-view (FOV) without physically increasing the detector size. However, this leads to an asymmetric sinogram with a truncated set of projection that needs to be considered during image reconstruction., especially when using analytical methods such as the filtered backprojection (FBP) and its 3D approximation, the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) algorithm. Various approaches have been suggested in literature, which can be roughly categorized as weighting based and projection rebinning approaches. In this paper, a comparison between the two approaches are made using the XCAT phantom, based on the geometry of the Varian On-Board Imager (OBI) as the CBCT acquisition device that is usually used for image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) during treatment delivery. It is found that analytical reconstruction alone will produce a percent normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) of 36.81% in the reconstructed image, whereas using the weighting based and rebinning approaches reduces this error to 22.86% and 4.68% respectively. Apart from that, the weighting based approach is also found to be on average biased and produces an overall lower intensity in the reconstructed image whereas the rebinning approach does not have this problem, as well as having a smaller standard deviation of the intensity deviations from the original phantom image as the ground truth.","PeriodicalId":103255,"journal":{"name":"2018 2nd International Conference on BioSignal Analysis, Processing and Systems (ICBAPS)","volume":"143 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Projection Weighting and Rebinning Approaches in Analytical Image Reconstruction in Off-Center Flat Panel Cone-Beam CT Imaging\",\"authors\":\"A. T. Amin, Ashrani Aizzuddin Abd. Rahni, S. S. Mokri, Rozilawati Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICBAPS.2018.8527405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging, a half-fan (HF) mode acquisition can be used to obtain a larger field-of-view (FOV) without physically increasing the detector size. However, this leads to an asymmetric sinogram with a truncated set of projection that needs to be considered during image reconstruction., especially when using analytical methods such as the filtered backprojection (FBP) and its 3D approximation, the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) algorithm. Various approaches have been suggested in literature, which can be roughly categorized as weighting based and projection rebinning approaches. In this paper, a comparison between the two approaches are made using the XCAT phantom, based on the geometry of the Varian On-Board Imager (OBI) as the CBCT acquisition device that is usually used for image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) during treatment delivery. It is found that analytical reconstruction alone will produce a percent normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) of 36.81% in the reconstructed image, whereas using the weighting based and rebinning approaches reduces this error to 22.86% and 4.68% respectively. Apart from that, the weighting based approach is also found to be on average biased and produces an overall lower intensity in the reconstructed image whereas the rebinning approach does not have this problem, as well as having a smaller standard deviation of the intensity deviations from the original phantom image as the ground truth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 2nd International Conference on BioSignal Analysis, Processing and Systems (ICBAPS)\",\"volume\":\"143 22\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 2nd International Conference on BioSignal Analysis, Processing and Systems (ICBAPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBAPS.2018.8527405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 2nd International Conference on BioSignal Analysis, Processing and Systems (ICBAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBAPS.2018.8527405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在锥束CT (CBCT)成像中,半扇(HF)模式采集可以在不增加探测器尺寸的情况下获得更大的视场(FOV)。然而,这会导致一个不对称的正弦图,在图像重建过程中需要考虑一个截断的投影集。特别是在使用诸如滤波反向投影(FBP)及其3D近似,Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK)算法等分析方法时。文献中提出了各种方法,大致可分为基于加权的方法和投影重建方法。在本文中,基于瓦里安机载成像仪(OBI)作为CBCT采集设备的几何结构,使用XCAT幻影对两种方法进行了比较,该设备通常用于治疗过程中的图像引导放疗(IGRT)。研究发现,单纯的分析重建会产生36.81%的归一化均方根误差(NRMSE),而使用加权和重划方法将重构图像的归一化均方根误差分别降低到22.86%和4.68%。除此之外,基于加权的方法也被发现存在平均偏差,并且在重建图像中产生整体较低的强度,而重建方法则没有这个问题,并且与原始幻象图像的强度偏差的标准偏差较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between Projection Weighting and Rebinning Approaches in Analytical Image Reconstruction in Off-Center Flat Panel Cone-Beam CT Imaging
In cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging, a half-fan (HF) mode acquisition can be used to obtain a larger field-of-view (FOV) without physically increasing the detector size. However, this leads to an asymmetric sinogram with a truncated set of projection that needs to be considered during image reconstruction., especially when using analytical methods such as the filtered backprojection (FBP) and its 3D approximation, the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) algorithm. Various approaches have been suggested in literature, which can be roughly categorized as weighting based and projection rebinning approaches. In this paper, a comparison between the two approaches are made using the XCAT phantom, based on the geometry of the Varian On-Board Imager (OBI) as the CBCT acquisition device that is usually used for image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) during treatment delivery. It is found that analytical reconstruction alone will produce a percent normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) of 36.81% in the reconstructed image, whereas using the weighting based and rebinning approaches reduces this error to 22.86% and 4.68% respectively. Apart from that, the weighting based approach is also found to be on average biased and produces an overall lower intensity in the reconstructed image whereas the rebinning approach does not have this problem, as well as having a smaller standard deviation of the intensity deviations from the original phantom image as the ground truth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信