五种不同的多处理器SoC总线架构的比较

Kyeong Keol Ryu, Eung S. Shin, V. Mooney
{"title":"五种不同的多处理器SoC总线架构的比较","authors":"Kyeong Keol Ryu, Eung S. Shin, V. Mooney","doi":"10.1109/DSD.2001.952283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of a system, especially multiprocessor system, heavily depends upon the efficiency of its bus architecture. In System-on-a-Chip (SoC), the bus architecture can be devised with advantages such as shorter propagation delay (resulting in a faster bus clock), larger bus width, and multiple buses. This paper presents five different SoC bus architectures for a multiprocessor system: Global Bus I Architecture (GBIA), Global Bus II Architecture (GBIIA), Bi-FIFO Bus Architecture (BFBA), Crossbar Switch Bus Architecture (CSBA), and CoreConnect Bus architecture (CCBA). The performance of these architectures is evaluated using applications from wireless communications-an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) transmitter-and from video processing-an MPEG2 decoder. To increase performance, these bus architectures employ a pipelined scheme, resulting in improved throughput. While all five bus architectures perform well, we find that BFBA and CSBA perform the best for the OFDM transmitter and the MPEG2 decoder, respectively.","PeriodicalId":285358,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Euromicro Symposium on Digital Systems Design","volume":"33 49","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"102","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of five different multiprocessor SoC bus architectures\",\"authors\":\"Kyeong Keol Ryu, Eung S. Shin, V. Mooney\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DSD.2001.952283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The performance of a system, especially multiprocessor system, heavily depends upon the efficiency of its bus architecture. In System-on-a-Chip (SoC), the bus architecture can be devised with advantages such as shorter propagation delay (resulting in a faster bus clock), larger bus width, and multiple buses. This paper presents five different SoC bus architectures for a multiprocessor system: Global Bus I Architecture (GBIA), Global Bus II Architecture (GBIIA), Bi-FIFO Bus Architecture (BFBA), Crossbar Switch Bus Architecture (CSBA), and CoreConnect Bus architecture (CCBA). The performance of these architectures is evaluated using applications from wireless communications-an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) transmitter-and from video processing-an MPEG2 decoder. To increase performance, these bus architectures employ a pipelined scheme, resulting in improved throughput. While all five bus architectures perform well, we find that BFBA and CSBA perform the best for the OFDM transmitter and the MPEG2 decoder, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Euromicro Symposium on Digital Systems Design\",\"volume\":\"33 49\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"102\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Euromicro Symposium on Digital Systems Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSD.2001.952283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Euromicro Symposium on Digital Systems Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSD.2001.952283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

摘要

系统的性能,特别是多处理器系统的性能,很大程度上取决于其总线体系结构的效率。在片上系统(SoC)中,总线架构可以设计成具有诸如更短的传播延迟(导致更快的总线时钟),更大的总线宽度和多总线等优点。本文介绍了用于多处理器系统的五种不同的SoC总线架构:全球总线I架构(GBIA),全球总线II架构(GBIIA), Bi-FIFO总线架构(BFBA), Crossbar交换总线架构(CSBA)和CoreConnect总线架构(CCBA)。这些架构的性能通过无线通信(正交频分复用(OFDM)发射机)和视频处理(MPEG2解码器)的应用进行评估。为了提高性能,这些总线体系结构采用流水线方案,从而提高了吞吐量。虽然所有五种总线架构都表现良好,但我们发现BFBA和CSBA分别对OFDM发送器和MPEG2解码器表现最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of five different multiprocessor SoC bus architectures
The performance of a system, especially multiprocessor system, heavily depends upon the efficiency of its bus architecture. In System-on-a-Chip (SoC), the bus architecture can be devised with advantages such as shorter propagation delay (resulting in a faster bus clock), larger bus width, and multiple buses. This paper presents five different SoC bus architectures for a multiprocessor system: Global Bus I Architecture (GBIA), Global Bus II Architecture (GBIIA), Bi-FIFO Bus Architecture (BFBA), Crossbar Switch Bus Architecture (CSBA), and CoreConnect Bus architecture (CCBA). The performance of these architectures is evaluated using applications from wireless communications-an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) transmitter-and from video processing-an MPEG2 decoder. To increase performance, these bus architectures employ a pipelined scheme, resulting in improved throughput. While all five bus architectures perform well, we find that BFBA and CSBA perform the best for the OFDM transmitter and the MPEG2 decoder, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信