评估候选实现技术可行性的需求驱动和协作决策支持方法

Bradley Wehrwein, Gilberto Matos, Rajanikanth Tanikella
{"title":"评估候选实现技术可行性的需求驱动和协作决策支持方法","authors":"Bradley Wehrwein, Gilberto Matos, Rajanikanth Tanikella","doi":"10.1109/EDOC.2008.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Platforms, frameworks, and other forms of software assets are proliferating in the industry for well-documented reasons. Architects may choose from a wide variety of implementation technologies to realize their envisioned software architecture. Each asset provides the ability to fulfill a set of requirements, and imposes a set of constraints. Given these complex compatibility relationships, it is a non-trivial task to determine how best to utilize candidate assets toward a defined business problem. This task is made harder when multiple stakeholders from various backgrounds contribute to the decision-making process, as often occurs in large projects.By grouping requirements by functional area, and relating them to corresponding candidate technologies, we propose an approach that allows stakeholders to collaboratively reason about the satisfaction of requirements, the compatibility of technologies, and integration risk. The goal is to narrow the initial space of technologies to a smaller number of viable candidate technology sets.","PeriodicalId":210496,"journal":{"name":"2008 12th International IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference","volume":"115 1-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Requirements-Driven and Collaborative Decision Support Approach for Evaluating the Viability of Candidate Implementation Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Bradley Wehrwein, Gilberto Matos, Rajanikanth Tanikella\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOC.2008.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Platforms, frameworks, and other forms of software assets are proliferating in the industry for well-documented reasons. Architects may choose from a wide variety of implementation technologies to realize their envisioned software architecture. Each asset provides the ability to fulfill a set of requirements, and imposes a set of constraints. Given these complex compatibility relationships, it is a non-trivial task to determine how best to utilize candidate assets toward a defined business problem. This task is made harder when multiple stakeholders from various backgrounds contribute to the decision-making process, as often occurs in large projects.By grouping requirements by functional area, and relating them to corresponding candidate technologies, we propose an approach that allows stakeholders to collaboratively reason about the satisfaction of requirements, the compatibility of technologies, and integration risk. The goal is to narrow the initial space of technologies to a smaller number of viable candidate technology sets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 12th International IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference\",\"volume\":\"115 1-4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 12th International IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2008.46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 12th International IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2008.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

平台、框架和其他形式的软件资产在业界的激增是有充分理由的。架构师可以从各种各样的实现技术中进行选择,以实现他们设想的软件架构。每个资产提供了满足一组需求的能力,并施加了一组约束。考虑到这些复杂的兼容性关系,确定如何最好地利用候选资产来解决已定义的业务问题是一项非常重要的任务。当来自不同背景的多个利益相关者参与决策过程时,这一任务变得更加困难,这在大型项目中经常发生。通过按功能领域对需求进行分组,并将它们与相应的候选技术联系起来,我们提出了一种方法,该方法允许涉众协作地对需求的满足、技术的兼容性和集成风险进行推理。目标是将技术的初始空间缩小到较少数量的可行候选技术集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Requirements-Driven and Collaborative Decision Support Approach for Evaluating the Viability of Candidate Implementation Technologies
Platforms, frameworks, and other forms of software assets are proliferating in the industry for well-documented reasons. Architects may choose from a wide variety of implementation technologies to realize their envisioned software architecture. Each asset provides the ability to fulfill a set of requirements, and imposes a set of constraints. Given these complex compatibility relationships, it is a non-trivial task to determine how best to utilize candidate assets toward a defined business problem. This task is made harder when multiple stakeholders from various backgrounds contribute to the decision-making process, as often occurs in large projects.By grouping requirements by functional area, and relating them to corresponding candidate technologies, we propose an approach that allows stakeholders to collaboratively reason about the satisfaction of requirements, the compatibility of technologies, and integration risk. The goal is to narrow the initial space of technologies to a smaller number of viable candidate technology sets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信