全身性体质障碍

J. Farrier
{"title":"全身性体质障碍","authors":"J. Farrier","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This introductory chapter provides an overview of congressional litigation, which provides an outlet for the frustrations and constitutional arguments of members. Members often file the lawsuit because they know the regular legislative process will stall or fail to overcome a presidential veto even if they manage to pass a bill that curtails executive branch power. Member lawsuits deserve attention individually and together as separation of powers phenomena that are distinct from private litigation on the same topics. Private suits are more likely to succeed for a variety of reasons, while member suits provide an index of constitutional dysfunction. Ultimately, member lawsuits do not offer a simple solution to past, present, or future institutional imbalances, but they certainly provide opportunity for fresh analysis on how constitutional separation of powers principles can fall apart without deep and wide support. The chapter then considers the role of federal courts in constitutional conflicts.","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"56 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic Constitutional Dysfunction\",\"authors\":\"J. Farrier\",\"doi\":\"10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This introductory chapter provides an overview of congressional litigation, which provides an outlet for the frustrations and constitutional arguments of members. Members often file the lawsuit because they know the regular legislative process will stall or fail to overcome a presidential veto even if they manage to pass a bill that curtails executive branch power. Member lawsuits deserve attention individually and together as separation of powers phenomena that are distinct from private litigation on the same topics. Private suits are more likely to succeed for a variety of reasons, while member suits provide an index of constitutional dysfunction. Ultimately, member lawsuits do not offer a simple solution to past, present, or future institutional imbalances, but they certainly provide opportunity for fresh analysis on how constitutional separation of powers principles can fall apart without deep and wide support. The chapter then considers the role of federal courts in constitutional conflicts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial\",\"volume\":\"56 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一导论章概述了国会诉讼,为议员的挫折和宪法论点提供了一个出口。议员们经常提起诉讼,因为他们知道,即使他们设法通过了一项限制行政部门权力的法案,正常的立法程序也会拖延或无法克服总统的否决。成员诉讼作为不同于同一主题的私人诉讼的三权分立现象,无论是单独的还是共同的都值得关注。由于各种原因,私人诉讼更有可能成功,而会员诉讼则提供了宪法功能障碍的指标。最终,成员诉讼并没有为过去、现在或未来的制度失衡提供一个简单的解决方案,但它们肯定提供了一个新的分析机会,即如果没有深入和广泛的支持,宪法三权分立原则是如何崩溃的。本章接着讨论了联邦法院在宪法冲突中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systemic Constitutional Dysfunction
This introductory chapter provides an overview of congressional litigation, which provides an outlet for the frustrations and constitutional arguments of members. Members often file the lawsuit because they know the regular legislative process will stall or fail to overcome a presidential veto even if they manage to pass a bill that curtails executive branch power. Member lawsuits deserve attention individually and together as separation of powers phenomena that are distinct from private litigation on the same topics. Private suits are more likely to succeed for a variety of reasons, while member suits provide an index of constitutional dysfunction. Ultimately, member lawsuits do not offer a simple solution to past, present, or future institutional imbalances, but they certainly provide opportunity for fresh analysis on how constitutional separation of powers principles can fall apart without deep and wide support. The chapter then considers the role of federal courts in constitutional conflicts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信