社区、共识、强制、控制:政策如何调解大众参与

Travis Kriplean, Ivan Beschastnikh, David W. Mcdonald, Scott A. Golder
{"title":"社区、共识、强制、控制:政策如何调解大众参与","authors":"Travis Kriplean, Ivan Beschastnikh, David W. Mcdonald, Scott A. Golder","doi":"10.1145/1316624.1316648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When large groups cooperate, issues of conflict and control surface because of differences in perspective. Managing such diverse views is a persistent problem in cooperative group work. The Wikipedian community has responded with an evolving body of policies that provide shared principles, processes, and strategies for collaboration. We employ a grounded approach to study a sample of active talk pages and examine how policies are employed as contributors work towards consensus. Although policies help build a stronger community, we find that ambiguities in policies give rise to power plays. This lens demonstrates that support for mass collaboration must take into account policy and power.","PeriodicalId":445069,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work","volume":"23 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"142","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs*w or how policy mediates mass participation\",\"authors\":\"Travis Kriplean, Ivan Beschastnikh, David W. Mcdonald, Scott A. Golder\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1316624.1316648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When large groups cooperate, issues of conflict and control surface because of differences in perspective. Managing such diverse views is a persistent problem in cooperative group work. The Wikipedian community has responded with an evolving body of policies that provide shared principles, processes, and strategies for collaboration. We employ a grounded approach to study a sample of active talk pages and examine how policies are employed as contributors work towards consensus. Although policies help build a stronger community, we find that ambiguities in policies give rise to power plays. This lens demonstrates that support for mass collaboration must take into account policy and power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"142\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 142

摘要

当大群体合作时,由于观点的不同,冲突和控制问题就会浮出水面。管理这种不同的观点是合作小组工作中一个长期存在的问题。维基人社区以一系列不断发展的政策作为回应,这些政策为协作提供了共享的原则、流程和策略。我们采用了一种有根据的方法来研究活跃讨论页的样本,并检查政策是如何被采用的,因为贡献者致力于达成共识。虽然政策有助于建立一个更强大的社区,但我们发现政策的模糊性会引发权力博弈。这一视角表明,支持大规模协作必须考虑到政策和权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs*w or how policy mediates mass participation
When large groups cooperate, issues of conflict and control surface because of differences in perspective. Managing such diverse views is a persistent problem in cooperative group work. The Wikipedian community has responded with an evolving body of policies that provide shared principles, processes, and strategies for collaboration. We employ a grounded approach to study a sample of active talk pages and examine how policies are employed as contributors work towards consensus. Although policies help build a stronger community, we find that ambiguities in policies give rise to power plays. This lens demonstrates that support for mass collaboration must take into account policy and power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信