使用激光安全(60825)和灯安全(62471)指南对6W扩展激光源进行光学危害评估

N. Haigh, E. Mcnaghten
{"title":"使用激光安全(60825)和灯安全(62471)指南对6W扩展激光源进行光学危害评估","authors":"N. Haigh, E. Mcnaghten","doi":"10.2351/1.5118595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laser and LED light sources are nowadays being deployed in a wide-ranging number of illumination applications where high levels of irradiance are required at the target site. The optical hazard assessment route will usually follow a laser or lamp related assessment as appropriate. However, for the case of an extended laser source it is possible to apply a radiance analysis methodology via both the laser and LED standards. This paper describes the assessment of an extended 6W laser source used for forensic science investigations where there was a desire to avoid engineering safety controls commensurate with a Class 4 laser, and to allow the laser to be used in the field in a manner akin to an inspection lamp. Accordingly, there was a desire to determine the optical hazard distance posed by the extended laser source to support the risk assessment for field use. By following the assessment methodologies defined in the laser (60825) and lamp (62471) standards [1, 2] it is possible to derive a useful double-check on the hazard assessment outcome using a methodology which is highly instructive to the optical radiation safety adviser. The steps required for the dual assessment approach will be clearly described and reviewed in this paper to clarify the process and highlight a potential for a convergence of the laser and lamp safety standards in terms of extended source characterization and applications-based risk assessment.Laser and LED light sources are nowadays being deployed in a wide-ranging number of illumination applications where high levels of irradiance are required at the target site. The optical hazard assessment route will usually follow a laser or lamp related assessment as appropriate. However, for the case of an extended laser source it is possible to apply a radiance analysis methodology via both the laser and LED standards. This paper describes the assessment of an extended 6W laser source used for forensic science investigations where there was a desire to avoid engineering safety controls commensurate with a Class 4 laser, and to allow the laser to be used in the field in a manner akin to an inspection lamp. Accordingly, there was a desire to determine the optical hazard distance posed by the extended laser source to support the risk assessment for field use. By following the assessment methodologies defined in the laser (60825) and lamp (62471) standards [1, 2] it is possible to derive a useful double-ch...","PeriodicalId":118257,"journal":{"name":"International Laser Safety Conference","volume":"419 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical hazard assessment of 6W extended laser source using laser safety (60825) and lamp safety (62471) guidelines\",\"authors\":\"N. Haigh, E. Mcnaghten\",\"doi\":\"10.2351/1.5118595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Laser and LED light sources are nowadays being deployed in a wide-ranging number of illumination applications where high levels of irradiance are required at the target site. The optical hazard assessment route will usually follow a laser or lamp related assessment as appropriate. However, for the case of an extended laser source it is possible to apply a radiance analysis methodology via both the laser and LED standards. This paper describes the assessment of an extended 6W laser source used for forensic science investigations where there was a desire to avoid engineering safety controls commensurate with a Class 4 laser, and to allow the laser to be used in the field in a manner akin to an inspection lamp. Accordingly, there was a desire to determine the optical hazard distance posed by the extended laser source to support the risk assessment for field use. By following the assessment methodologies defined in the laser (60825) and lamp (62471) standards [1, 2] it is possible to derive a useful double-check on the hazard assessment outcome using a methodology which is highly instructive to the optical radiation safety adviser. The steps required for the dual assessment approach will be clearly described and reviewed in this paper to clarify the process and highlight a potential for a convergence of the laser and lamp safety standards in terms of extended source characterization and applications-based risk assessment.Laser and LED light sources are nowadays being deployed in a wide-ranging number of illumination applications where high levels of irradiance are required at the target site. The optical hazard assessment route will usually follow a laser or lamp related assessment as appropriate. However, for the case of an extended laser source it is possible to apply a radiance analysis methodology via both the laser and LED standards. This paper describes the assessment of an extended 6W laser source used for forensic science investigations where there was a desire to avoid engineering safety controls commensurate with a Class 4 laser, and to allow the laser to be used in the field in a manner akin to an inspection lamp. Accordingly, there was a desire to determine the optical hazard distance posed by the extended laser source to support the risk assessment for field use. By following the assessment methodologies defined in the laser (60825) and lamp (62471) standards [1, 2] it is possible to derive a useful double-ch...\",\"PeriodicalId\":118257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Laser Safety Conference\",\"volume\":\"419 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Laser Safety Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2351/1.5118595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Laser Safety Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2351/1.5118595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,激光和LED光源被广泛应用于需要在目标位置获得高辐照度的照明应用中。光学危害评估路线通常将遵循适当的激光或灯相关评估。然而,对于扩展激光源的情况,可以通过激光和LED标准应用辐射度分析方法。本文描述了用于法医科学调查的扩展6W激光源的评估,其中希望避免与4级激光相称的工程安全控制,并允许激光以类似于检查灯的方式在现场使用。因此,希望确定扩展激光源造成的光学危害距离,以支持现场使用的风险评估。通过遵循激光(60825)和灯(62471)标准[1,2]中定义的评估方法,可以使用一种对光辐射安全顾问具有高度指导意义的方法,对危害评估结果进行有用的双重检查。本文将清楚地描述和回顾双重评估方法所需的步骤,以阐明该过程,并强调在扩展源表征和基于应用的风险评估方面,激光和灯安全标准趋同的潜力。如今,激光和LED光源被广泛应用于需要在目标位置获得高辐照度的照明应用中。光学危害评估路线通常将遵循适当的激光或灯相关评估。然而,对于扩展激光源的情况,可以通过激光和LED标准应用辐射度分析方法。本文描述了用于法医科学调查的扩展6W激光源的评估,其中希望避免与4级激光相称的工程安全控制,并允许激光以类似于检查灯的方式在现场使用。因此,希望确定扩展激光源造成的光学危害距离,以支持现场使用的风险评估。通过遵循激光(60825)和灯(62471)标准[1,2]中定义的评估方法,可以推导出有用的双ch…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optical hazard assessment of 6W extended laser source using laser safety (60825) and lamp safety (62471) guidelines
Laser and LED light sources are nowadays being deployed in a wide-ranging number of illumination applications where high levels of irradiance are required at the target site. The optical hazard assessment route will usually follow a laser or lamp related assessment as appropriate. However, for the case of an extended laser source it is possible to apply a radiance analysis methodology via both the laser and LED standards. This paper describes the assessment of an extended 6W laser source used for forensic science investigations where there was a desire to avoid engineering safety controls commensurate with a Class 4 laser, and to allow the laser to be used in the field in a manner akin to an inspection lamp. Accordingly, there was a desire to determine the optical hazard distance posed by the extended laser source to support the risk assessment for field use. By following the assessment methodologies defined in the laser (60825) and lamp (62471) standards [1, 2] it is possible to derive a useful double-check on the hazard assessment outcome using a methodology which is highly instructive to the optical radiation safety adviser. The steps required for the dual assessment approach will be clearly described and reviewed in this paper to clarify the process and highlight a potential for a convergence of the laser and lamp safety standards in terms of extended source characterization and applications-based risk assessment.Laser and LED light sources are nowadays being deployed in a wide-ranging number of illumination applications where high levels of irradiance are required at the target site. The optical hazard assessment route will usually follow a laser or lamp related assessment as appropriate. However, for the case of an extended laser source it is possible to apply a radiance analysis methodology via both the laser and LED standards. This paper describes the assessment of an extended 6W laser source used for forensic science investigations where there was a desire to avoid engineering safety controls commensurate with a Class 4 laser, and to allow the laser to be used in the field in a manner akin to an inspection lamp. Accordingly, there was a desire to determine the optical hazard distance posed by the extended laser source to support the risk assessment for field use. By following the assessment methodologies defined in the laser (60825) and lamp (62471) standards [1, 2] it is possible to derive a useful double-ch...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信