{"title":"网络世界:对特刊《在线》的回应","authors":"C. Howard","doi":"10.29173/PANDPR25365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hats off to the editors and contributors of the special issue of Phenomenology & Practice, Being Online (vol. 8, no. 4). As a whole and in parts, this is a highly stimulating collection of articles on one of the single most important and challenging subjects of our times. It is also one about which the phenomenology of practice has much to say. Guest editors Norm Friesen and Stacey Irwin begin the issue with a reflection on questioning, the essence of which, as Gadamer (2000, p. 299) says, lies in opening up possibilities and keeping them open. Invoking Heidegger’s notion that “questioning builds a way” (1952, 1977, p. 3), the issue aims (and in my view succeeds), in opening different ways of thinking about the multiple ways of Being Online. This open invitation encompasses nothing less than the Internet, digitally mediated sociality and subjectivities with all the potentialities, actualities and ambiguities these phenomena imply. Proceeding from Heidegger’s wayfinding metaphor, the issue invites us to explore what Being Online means for being-in-the-world. With their attention to lived experience gained through the reflexive practice of epoche, phenomenologists are particularly well positioned for the kind of inquiry that moves beyond a functional, disembodied understanding of technology in order to situate it firmly in the lifeworld. This living world is one in which human beings cannot be taken as separate from the environments they inhabit and in which they are enveloped. Following the kind of relational ontology laid out Merleau-Ponty (2013), with its emphasis on the reversibility of energies between bodies and worlds (and by extension, tools and technologies), phenomenologists understand that existence is always already a dynamic co-existence. Bernhard Waldenfels is one such phenomenologist who proceeds from and radicalizes this position with the help of his former teacher Merleau-Ponty, as well as with Levinas and Husserl. It was wonderful to see his work, which is sadly limited in English, being highlighted by Friesen in his article, “Telepresence and Teleabsence: Phenomenology of the (In)visible Alien Online”, as well as his short yet comprehensive introduction, “Waldenfels’ Responsive Phenomenology of the Alien.”","PeriodicalId":217543,"journal":{"name":"Phenomenology and Practice","volume":"99 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Being-online-in-the-world: A response to the special issue, ‘Being Online’\",\"authors\":\"C. Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.29173/PANDPR25365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hats off to the editors and contributors of the special issue of Phenomenology & Practice, Being Online (vol. 8, no. 4). As a whole and in parts, this is a highly stimulating collection of articles on one of the single most important and challenging subjects of our times. It is also one about which the phenomenology of practice has much to say. Guest editors Norm Friesen and Stacey Irwin begin the issue with a reflection on questioning, the essence of which, as Gadamer (2000, p. 299) says, lies in opening up possibilities and keeping them open. Invoking Heidegger’s notion that “questioning builds a way” (1952, 1977, p. 3), the issue aims (and in my view succeeds), in opening different ways of thinking about the multiple ways of Being Online. This open invitation encompasses nothing less than the Internet, digitally mediated sociality and subjectivities with all the potentialities, actualities and ambiguities these phenomena imply. Proceeding from Heidegger’s wayfinding metaphor, the issue invites us to explore what Being Online means for being-in-the-world. With their attention to lived experience gained through the reflexive practice of epoche, phenomenologists are particularly well positioned for the kind of inquiry that moves beyond a functional, disembodied understanding of technology in order to situate it firmly in the lifeworld. This living world is one in which human beings cannot be taken as separate from the environments they inhabit and in which they are enveloped. Following the kind of relational ontology laid out Merleau-Ponty (2013), with its emphasis on the reversibility of energies between bodies and worlds (and by extension, tools and technologies), phenomenologists understand that existence is always already a dynamic co-existence. Bernhard Waldenfels is one such phenomenologist who proceeds from and radicalizes this position with the help of his former teacher Merleau-Ponty, as well as with Levinas and Husserl. It was wonderful to see his work, which is sadly limited in English, being highlighted by Friesen in his article, “Telepresence and Teleabsence: Phenomenology of the (In)visible Alien Online”, as well as his short yet comprehensive introduction, “Waldenfels’ Responsive Phenomenology of the Alien.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":217543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phenomenology and Practice\",\"volume\":\"99 14\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phenomenology and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29173/PANDPR25365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomenology and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/PANDPR25365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
向《现象学与实践》特刊的编辑和撰稿人致敬,《在线》(第八卷,第8期)。从整体和部分来看,这是一本关于我们这个时代最重要、最具挑战性的主题之一的极具启发性的文集。这也是实践现象学有很多话要说的。特邀编辑Norm Friesen和Stacey Irwin以对提问的反思开始这期杂志,正如Gadamer (2000, p. 299)所说,提问的本质在于打开可能性并保持开放。引用海德格尔的“质疑建立一种方式”(1952,1977,第3页)的概念,这个问题的目的是(在我看来是成功的)打开了思考“在线”的多种方式的不同方式。这个公开的邀请包含了互联网、数字媒介的社会性和主体性,以及这些现象所隐含的所有可能性、现实性和模糊性。从海德格尔的寻路隐喻出发,这个问题邀请我们去探索“在线”对于“在世界”意味着什么。通过对时代反思性实践获得的生活经验的关注,现象学家特别适合于超越对技术的功能、无实体理解的探究,以便将其牢固地置于生活世界中。在这个活生生的世界里,人类不能被视为与他们所居住和包围的环境分开。按照梅洛-庞蒂(merlo - ponty, 2013)提出的关系本体论,强调身体和世界(以及延伸到工具和技术)之间能量的可逆性,现象学家理解存在总是已经是一种动态的共存。伯恩哈德·瓦尔登费尔斯就是这样一个现象学家,他在他以前的老师梅洛-庞蒂,以及列维纳斯和胡塞尔的帮助下,从这个立场出发,并将其激进化。弗里森在他的文章《远程呈现和远程缺席:可见外星人在线的现象学》以及他简短而全面的介绍《Waldenfels’Responsive Phenomenology of the Alien》中强调了他的作品,很高兴看到他的作品(遗憾的是英文有限)。
Being-online-in-the-world: A response to the special issue, ‘Being Online’
Hats off to the editors and contributors of the special issue of Phenomenology & Practice, Being Online (vol. 8, no. 4). As a whole and in parts, this is a highly stimulating collection of articles on one of the single most important and challenging subjects of our times. It is also one about which the phenomenology of practice has much to say. Guest editors Norm Friesen and Stacey Irwin begin the issue with a reflection on questioning, the essence of which, as Gadamer (2000, p. 299) says, lies in opening up possibilities and keeping them open. Invoking Heidegger’s notion that “questioning builds a way” (1952, 1977, p. 3), the issue aims (and in my view succeeds), in opening different ways of thinking about the multiple ways of Being Online. This open invitation encompasses nothing less than the Internet, digitally mediated sociality and subjectivities with all the potentialities, actualities and ambiguities these phenomena imply. Proceeding from Heidegger’s wayfinding metaphor, the issue invites us to explore what Being Online means for being-in-the-world. With their attention to lived experience gained through the reflexive practice of epoche, phenomenologists are particularly well positioned for the kind of inquiry that moves beyond a functional, disembodied understanding of technology in order to situate it firmly in the lifeworld. This living world is one in which human beings cannot be taken as separate from the environments they inhabit and in which they are enveloped. Following the kind of relational ontology laid out Merleau-Ponty (2013), with its emphasis on the reversibility of energies between bodies and worlds (and by extension, tools and technologies), phenomenologists understand that existence is always already a dynamic co-existence. Bernhard Waldenfels is one such phenomenologist who proceeds from and radicalizes this position with the help of his former teacher Merleau-Ponty, as well as with Levinas and Husserl. It was wonderful to see his work, which is sadly limited in English, being highlighted by Friesen in his article, “Telepresence and Teleabsence: Phenomenology of the (In)visible Alien Online”, as well as his short yet comprehensive introduction, “Waldenfels’ Responsive Phenomenology of the Alien.”