J. Halámek, P. Jurák, P. Veselý, V. Vondra, P. Leinveber
{"title":"心率与QT间期的线性/非线性耦合分析","authors":"J. Halámek, P. Jurák, P. Veselý, V. Vondra, P. Leinveber","doi":"10.1109/ESGCO.2014.6847517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two groups of subjects (21 healthy, 21 hypertensive patients) were tested during two measurement protocols (exercise, tilt). Two models of QT-RR coupling were tested - linear (LM) and nonlinear (NLM). QTc reproducibility was used as evidence of model validity. Results: LM was significantly better (lower QTc irreproducibility) than NLM (P<;0.01) during the tilt-table test. The differences were not significant during the exercise test; NLM was slightly better in hypertensive patients, LM in healthy subjects. Maximal irreproducibility of QTc over subjects was found in both tests with NLM. Conclusion: Evidence of QT-RR nonlinearity cannot be based on minimal error between QT and model QT. QTc reproducibility must also be tested and the excitation specificity of QT-RR coupling must be considered.","PeriodicalId":385389,"journal":{"name":"2014 8th Conference of the European Study Group on Cardiovascular Oscillations (ESGCO)","volume":"35 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The analysis of linear/nonlinear coupling between heart rate and QT intervals\",\"authors\":\"J. Halámek, P. Jurák, P. Veselý, V. Vondra, P. Leinveber\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESGCO.2014.6847517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two groups of subjects (21 healthy, 21 hypertensive patients) were tested during two measurement protocols (exercise, tilt). Two models of QT-RR coupling were tested - linear (LM) and nonlinear (NLM). QTc reproducibility was used as evidence of model validity. Results: LM was significantly better (lower QTc irreproducibility) than NLM (P<;0.01) during the tilt-table test. The differences were not significant during the exercise test; NLM was slightly better in hypertensive patients, LM in healthy subjects. Maximal irreproducibility of QTc over subjects was found in both tests with NLM. Conclusion: Evidence of QT-RR nonlinearity cannot be based on minimal error between QT and model QT. QTc reproducibility must also be tested and the excitation specificity of QT-RR coupling must be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 8th Conference of the European Study Group on Cardiovascular Oscillations (ESGCO)\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 8th Conference of the European Study Group on Cardiovascular Oscillations (ESGCO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESGCO.2014.6847517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 8th Conference of the European Study Group on Cardiovascular Oscillations (ESGCO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESGCO.2014.6847517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The analysis of linear/nonlinear coupling between heart rate and QT intervals
Two groups of subjects (21 healthy, 21 hypertensive patients) were tested during two measurement protocols (exercise, tilt). Two models of QT-RR coupling were tested - linear (LM) and nonlinear (NLM). QTc reproducibility was used as evidence of model validity. Results: LM was significantly better (lower QTc irreproducibility) than NLM (P<;0.01) during the tilt-table test. The differences were not significant during the exercise test; NLM was slightly better in hypertensive patients, LM in healthy subjects. Maximal irreproducibility of QTc over subjects was found in both tests with NLM. Conclusion: Evidence of QT-RR nonlinearity cannot be based on minimal error between QT and model QT. QTc reproducibility must also be tested and the excitation specificity of QT-RR coupling must be considered.