Tan Wee Choon, A. AnasRahman, Tan Kia Yeong, Lim Eng Aik
{"title":"用CFD方法分析层流和湍流状态下的静孔误差","authors":"Tan Wee Choon, A. AnasRahman, Tan Kia Yeong, Lim Eng Aik","doi":"10.1109/CHUSER.2012.6504426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project is regarding conduct static hole error analysis on Venturi Tube using CFD approach in order to having better visualization of this phenomenon. Based on the dimensionless analysis, relevant parameters to static hole error are identified and the effect of ratio of pressure tap depth to pipe diameter range 0.4, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 and ratio of pressure tap diameter to pipe diameter range 0.02, 0.04, 0.06 and 0.08 were simulated in both laminar and turbulent flow regime. The results were compared with journal paper's results for validation with error of 1.86%. Besides that, results from static hole error analysis shows both hole diameter and depth of hole can influence the static pressure measurement.","PeriodicalId":444674,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER)","volume":"84 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Static hole error analysis within laminar and turbulent regime using CFD approach\",\"authors\":\"Tan Wee Choon, A. AnasRahman, Tan Kia Yeong, Lim Eng Aik\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CHUSER.2012.6504426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This project is regarding conduct static hole error analysis on Venturi Tube using CFD approach in order to having better visualization of this phenomenon. Based on the dimensionless analysis, relevant parameters to static hole error are identified and the effect of ratio of pressure tap depth to pipe diameter range 0.4, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 and ratio of pressure tap diameter to pipe diameter range 0.02, 0.04, 0.06 and 0.08 were simulated in both laminar and turbulent flow regime. The results were compared with journal paper's results for validation with error of 1.86%. Besides that, results from static hole error analysis shows both hole diameter and depth of hole can influence the static pressure measurement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER)\",\"volume\":\"84 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CHUSER.2012.6504426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CHUSER.2012.6504426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Static hole error analysis within laminar and turbulent regime using CFD approach
This project is regarding conduct static hole error analysis on Venturi Tube using CFD approach in order to having better visualization of this phenomenon. Based on the dimensionless analysis, relevant parameters to static hole error are identified and the effect of ratio of pressure tap depth to pipe diameter range 0.4, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 and ratio of pressure tap diameter to pipe diameter range 0.02, 0.04, 0.06 and 0.08 were simulated in both laminar and turbulent flow regime. The results were compared with journal paper's results for validation with error of 1.86%. Besides that, results from static hole error analysis shows both hole diameter and depth of hole can influence the static pressure measurement.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
