混合链空间

F. Javier, Thayer, Fábrega, C. Jonathan, Herzog, Joshua
{"title":"混合链空间","authors":"F. Javier, Thayer, Fábrega, C. Jonathan, Herzog, Joshua","doi":"10.1109/CSFW.1999.779763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strand space analysis is a method for stating and proving correctness properties for cryptographic protocols. In this paper we apply the same method to the related problem of mixed protocols, and show that a protocol can remain correct even when used in combination with a range of other protocols. We illustrate the method with the familiar Otway-Rees protocol. We identify a simple and easily verified characteristic of protocols, and show that the Otway-Rees protocol remains correct even when used in combination with other protocols that have this characteristic. We also illustrate this method on the Neuman-Stubblebine protocol. This protocol has two parts, an authentication protocol (I) in which a key distribution center creates and distributes a Kerberos-like key, and a reauthentication protocol (II) in which a client resubmits a ticket containing that key. The re-authentication protocol II is known to be flawed. We show that in the presence of protocol II, there are also attacks against protocol I. We then define a variant of protocol II, and prove an authentication property of I that holds even in combination with the modified II.","PeriodicalId":374159,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop","volume":"6 5p1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"93","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed strand spaces\",\"authors\":\"F. Javier, Thayer, Fábrega, C. Jonathan, Herzog, Joshua\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSFW.1999.779763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Strand space analysis is a method for stating and proving correctness properties for cryptographic protocols. In this paper we apply the same method to the related problem of mixed protocols, and show that a protocol can remain correct even when used in combination with a range of other protocols. We illustrate the method with the familiar Otway-Rees protocol. We identify a simple and easily verified characteristic of protocols, and show that the Otway-Rees protocol remains correct even when used in combination with other protocols that have this characteristic. We also illustrate this method on the Neuman-Stubblebine protocol. This protocol has two parts, an authentication protocol (I) in which a key distribution center creates and distributes a Kerberos-like key, and a reauthentication protocol (II) in which a client resubmits a ticket containing that key. The re-authentication protocol II is known to be flawed. We show that in the presence of protocol II, there are also attacks against protocol I. We then define a variant of protocol II, and prove an authentication property of I that holds even in combination with the modified II.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop\",\"volume\":\"6 5p1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"93\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.1999.779763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.1999.779763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 93

摘要

链空间分析是一种说明和证明加密协议正确性的方法。在本文中,我们将同样的方法应用于混合协议的相关问题,并证明了一个协议即使与一系列其他协议组合使用也可以保持正确。我们用熟悉的oway - rees协议来说明该方法。我们确定了一个简单且易于验证的协议特性,并表明oway - rees协议即使与具有此特性的其他协议结合使用也仍然是正确的。我们还在Neuman-Stubblebine协议上说明了这种方法。该协议有两个部分,一个是身份验证协议(I),其中密钥分发中心创建并分发类似kerberos的密钥,另一个是重新身份验证协议(II),其中客户机重新提交包含该密钥的票证。众所周知,重新身份验证协议II存在缺陷。我们证明,在协议II存在的情况下,也存在针对协议I的攻击。然后,我们定义了协议II的一个变体,并证明了协议I的一个认证属性,即使与修改后的协议II结合使用,它也保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mixed strand spaces
Strand space analysis is a method for stating and proving correctness properties for cryptographic protocols. In this paper we apply the same method to the related problem of mixed protocols, and show that a protocol can remain correct even when used in combination with a range of other protocols. We illustrate the method with the familiar Otway-Rees protocol. We identify a simple and easily verified characteristic of protocols, and show that the Otway-Rees protocol remains correct even when used in combination with other protocols that have this characteristic. We also illustrate this method on the Neuman-Stubblebine protocol. This protocol has two parts, an authentication protocol (I) in which a key distribution center creates and distributes a Kerberos-like key, and a reauthentication protocol (II) in which a client resubmits a ticket containing that key. The re-authentication protocol II is known to be flawed. We show that in the presence of protocol II, there are also attacks against protocol I. We then define a variant of protocol II, and prove an authentication property of I that holds even in combination with the modified II.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信