含果糖糖和肥胖的重要食物来源:对照喂养试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

L. Chiavaroli, A. Cheung, Sabrina Ayoub-Charette, Amna Ahmed, Danielle Lee, F. Au‐Yeung, Néma D McGlynn, V. Ha, T. Khan, S. B. Mejia, V. Choo, R. Souza, Tom Wolever, Lawrence A Leiter, C. Kendall, D. Jenkins, J. Sievenpiper
{"title":"含果糖糖和肥胖的重要食物来源:对照喂养试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"L. Chiavaroli, A. Cheung, Sabrina Ayoub-Charette, Amna Ahmed, Danielle Lee, F. Au‐Yeung, Néma D McGlynn, V. Ha, T. Khan, S. B. Mejia, V. Choo, R. Souza, Tom Wolever, Lawrence A Leiter, C. Kendall, D. Jenkins, J. Sievenpiper","doi":"10.1093/CDN/NZAB053_010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nSugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) providing excess energy increase adiposity. The effect of other food sources of sugars at different energy control levels is unclear.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nTo determine the effect of food sources of fructose-containing sugars by energy control on adiposity.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through April 2022 for controlled trials ≥2 wk. We prespecified 4 trial designs by energy control: substitution (energy-matched replacement of sugars), addition (energy from sugars added), subtraction (energy from sugars subtracted), and ad libitum (energy from sugars freely replaced). Independent authors extracted data. The primary outcome was body weight. Secondary outcomes included other adiposity measures. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe included 169 trials (255 trial comparisons, n = 10,357) assessing 14 food sources at 4 energy control levels over a median 12 wk. Total fructose-containing sugars increased body weight (MD: 0.28 kg; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.50 kg; PMD = 0.011) in addition trials and decreased body weight (MD: -0.96 kg; 95% CI: -1.78, -0.14 kg; PMD = 0.022) in subtraction trials with no effect in substitution or ad libitum trials. There was interaction/influence by food sources on body weight: substitution trials [fruits decreased; added nutritive sweeteners and mixed sources (with SSBs) increased]; addition trials [dried fruits, honey, fruits (≤10%E), and 100% fruit juice (≤10%E) decreased; SSBs, fruit drink, and mixed sources (with SSBs) increased]; subtraction trials [removal of mixed sources (with SSBs) decreased]; and ad libitum trials [mixed sources (with/without SSBs) increased]. GRADE scores were generally moderate. Results were similar across secondary outcomes.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nEnergy control and food sources mediate the effect of fructose-containing sugars on adiposity. The evidence provides a good indication that excess energy from sugars (particularly SSBs at high doses ≥20%E or 100 g/d) increase adiposity, whereas their removal decrease adiposity. Most other food sources had no effect, with some showing decreases (particularly fruits at lower doses ≤10%E or 50 g/d). This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02558920 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02558920).","PeriodicalId":315016,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"14 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Important food sources of fructose-containing sugars and adiposity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials.\",\"authors\":\"L. Chiavaroli, A. Cheung, Sabrina Ayoub-Charette, Amna Ahmed, Danielle Lee, F. Au‐Yeung, Néma D McGlynn, V. Ha, T. Khan, S. B. Mejia, V. Choo, R. Souza, Tom Wolever, Lawrence A Leiter, C. Kendall, D. Jenkins, J. Sievenpiper\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CDN/NZAB053_010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nSugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) providing excess energy increase adiposity. The effect of other food sources of sugars at different energy control levels is unclear.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVES\\nTo determine the effect of food sources of fructose-containing sugars by energy control on adiposity.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through April 2022 for controlled trials ≥2 wk. We prespecified 4 trial designs by energy control: substitution (energy-matched replacement of sugars), addition (energy from sugars added), subtraction (energy from sugars subtracted), and ad libitum (energy from sugars freely replaced). Independent authors extracted data. The primary outcome was body weight. Secondary outcomes included other adiposity measures. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWe included 169 trials (255 trial comparisons, n = 10,357) assessing 14 food sources at 4 energy control levels over a median 12 wk. Total fructose-containing sugars increased body weight (MD: 0.28 kg; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.50 kg; PMD = 0.011) in addition trials and decreased body weight (MD: -0.96 kg; 95% CI: -1.78, -0.14 kg; PMD = 0.022) in subtraction trials with no effect in substitution or ad libitum trials. There was interaction/influence by food sources on body weight: substitution trials [fruits decreased; added nutritive sweeteners and mixed sources (with SSBs) increased]; addition trials [dried fruits, honey, fruits (≤10%E), and 100% fruit juice (≤10%E) decreased; SSBs, fruit drink, and mixed sources (with SSBs) increased]; subtraction trials [removal of mixed sources (with SSBs) decreased]; and ad libitum trials [mixed sources (with/without SSBs) increased]. GRADE scores were generally moderate. Results were similar across secondary outcomes.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nEnergy control and food sources mediate the effect of fructose-containing sugars on adiposity. The evidence provides a good indication that excess energy from sugars (particularly SSBs at high doses ≥20%E or 100 g/d) increase adiposity, whereas their removal decrease adiposity. Most other food sources had no effect, with some showing decreases (particularly fruits at lower doses ≤10%E or 50 g/d). This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02558920 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02558920).\",\"PeriodicalId\":315016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of clinical nutrition\",\"volume\":\"14 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of clinical nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CDN/NZAB053_010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CDN/NZAB053_010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:提供多余能量的含糖饮料(SSBs)会增加肥胖。在不同的能量控制水平下,其他食物来源的糖的影响尚不清楚。目的通过能量控制确定含果糖糖食物来源对肥胖的影响。方法在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,检索了截至2022年4月的MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中≥2周的对照试验。我们通过能量控制预先指定了4种试验设计:替代(能量匹配的糖替代)、添加(添加糖的能量)、减去(减去糖的能量)和自由(自由替换糖的能量)。独立作者提取数据。主要结果是体重。次要结果包括其他肥胖测量。建议分级评估、发展和评价(GRADE)用于评估证据的确定性。结果我们纳入了169项试验(255项试验比较,n = 10,357),评估了14种食物来源和4种能量控制水平,平均时间为12周。总含果糖糖增加体重(MD: 0.28 kg;95% CI: 0.06, 0.50 kg;PMD = 0.011)和体重下降(MD: -0.96 kg;95% CI: -1.78, -0.14 kg;PMD = 0.022)在减法试验中没有影响替代或自由试验。食物来源对体重有相互作用/影响:替代试验[水果减少;添加营养甜味剂和混合来源(含SSBs)增加];添加试验[干果、蜂蜜、水果(≤10%E)、100%果汁(≤10%E)]减少;SSBs、果汁饮料和混合来源(含SSBs)增加;减法试验[去除混合源(减少SSBs)];和自由试验[混合来源(含/不含SSBs)增加]。GRADE分数一般为中等。次要结局的结果相似。结论能量控制和食物来源介导了含果糖糖对肥胖的影响。证据很好地表明,来自糖的过量能量(特别是高剂量≥20%E或100 g/d的SSBs)会增加肥胖,而去除它们会减少肥胖。大多数其他食物来源没有影响,有一些表现出减少(特别是水果,剂量较低,≤10%E或50 g/d)。该试验在clinicaltrials.gov注册为NCT02558920 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02558920)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Important food sources of fructose-containing sugars and adiposity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials.
BACKGROUND Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) providing excess energy increase adiposity. The effect of other food sources of sugars at different energy control levels is unclear. OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of food sources of fructose-containing sugars by energy control on adiposity. METHODS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through April 2022 for controlled trials ≥2 wk. We prespecified 4 trial designs by energy control: substitution (energy-matched replacement of sugars), addition (energy from sugars added), subtraction (energy from sugars subtracted), and ad libitum (energy from sugars freely replaced). Independent authors extracted data. The primary outcome was body weight. Secondary outcomes included other adiposity measures. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS We included 169 trials (255 trial comparisons, n = 10,357) assessing 14 food sources at 4 energy control levels over a median 12 wk. Total fructose-containing sugars increased body weight (MD: 0.28 kg; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.50 kg; PMD = 0.011) in addition trials and decreased body weight (MD: -0.96 kg; 95% CI: -1.78, -0.14 kg; PMD = 0.022) in subtraction trials with no effect in substitution or ad libitum trials. There was interaction/influence by food sources on body weight: substitution trials [fruits decreased; added nutritive sweeteners and mixed sources (with SSBs) increased]; addition trials [dried fruits, honey, fruits (≤10%E), and 100% fruit juice (≤10%E) decreased; SSBs, fruit drink, and mixed sources (with SSBs) increased]; subtraction trials [removal of mixed sources (with SSBs) decreased]; and ad libitum trials [mixed sources (with/without SSBs) increased]. GRADE scores were generally moderate. Results were similar across secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Energy control and food sources mediate the effect of fructose-containing sugars on adiposity. The evidence provides a good indication that excess energy from sugars (particularly SSBs at high doses ≥20%E or 100 g/d) increase adiposity, whereas their removal decrease adiposity. Most other food sources had no effect, with some showing decreases (particularly fruits at lower doses ≤10%E or 50 g/d). This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02558920 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02558920).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信