Ayu Shafira Tubagus, Rizal Saepul Mahdi, Adhi Rizal, Aries Suharso
{"title":"Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1","authors":"Ayu Shafira Tubagus, Rizal Saepul Mahdi, Adhi Rizal, Aries Suharso","doi":"10.29408/edumatic.v5i2.3850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Video applications consume more energy on the Internet and can be accessed by electronic devices, due to an increase in the consumption of high-resolution and high-quality video content, presenting serious issues to delivery infrastructure that needs higher video compression technologies. The focus of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the most current codec, AV1, to its predecessor codec. The comparison was made experimentally at two video resolutions (1080p and 720p) by sampling video frames with various CRF/CQP values and testing several parameters analyses such as encoding duration, compression ratio, bit rate, Mean Square Error (MSE), and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR). The AV1 codec is very great in terms of quality and file size, even though it is slower in terms of compression speed. The H.265/HEVC codec, on the other side, beats the other codec in terms of compression ratio. In conclusion, the H.265/HEVC codec is suggested as a material for obtaining a well compressed video with small file size and a short time.","PeriodicalId":314771,"journal":{"name":"Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v5i2.3850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于高分辨率和高质量视频内容的消耗增加,视频应用程序在互联网上消耗更多的能量,并且可以通过电子设备访问,这给需要更高视频压缩技术的传输基础设施带来了严重的问题。本文的重点是比较当前最流行的编解码器AV1与其前身编解码器的质量。通过对不同CRF/CQP值的视频帧进行采样,并对编码持续时间、压缩比、比特率、均方误差(MSE)和峰值信噪比(PSNR)等参数进行分析测试,在1080p和720p两种视频分辨率下进行了实验比较。AV1编解码器在质量和文件大小方面非常出色,尽管它在压缩速度方面较慢。另一方面,H.265/HEVC编解码器在压缩比方面优于其他编解码器。综上所述,建议采用H.265/HEVC编解码器作为材料,以获得文件大小小、时间短的良好压缩视频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1
Video applications consume more energy on the Internet and can be accessed by electronic devices, due to an increase in the consumption of high-resolution and high-quality video content, presenting serious issues to delivery infrastructure that needs higher video compression technologies. The focus of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the most current codec, AV1, to its predecessor codec. The comparison was made experimentally at two video resolutions (1080p and 720p) by sampling video frames with various CRF/CQP values and testing several parameters analyses such as encoding duration, compression ratio, bit rate, Mean Square Error (MSE), and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR). The AV1 codec is very great in terms of quality and file size, even though it is slower in terms of compression speed. The H.265/HEVC codec, on the other side, beats the other codec in terms of compression ratio. In conclusion, the H.265/HEVC codec is suggested as a material for obtaining a well compressed video with small file size and a short time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信