出苗前除草剂对百慕草春季死斑恢复的影响

L. L. Beck, T. Cooper, A. J. Hephner, C. M. Straw, G. M. Henry
{"title":"出苗前除草剂对百慕草春季死斑恢复的影响","authors":"L. L. Beck,&nbsp;T. Cooper,&nbsp;A. J. Hephner,&nbsp;C. M. Straw,&nbsp;G. M. Henry","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field experiments were conducted in Texas to examine the recovery of a bermudagrass [<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> × <i>C. transvaalensis</i> (L.) Pers.] fairway from spring dead spot (SDS) disease following preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications. In 2011 and 2012 bermudagrass recovery from SDS in the non-treated check plots (46 and 59%, respectively) was similar to bermudagrass recovery in response to oxadiazon at 3.4 kg/ha (55 and 57%, respectively) 14 weeks after treatment (WAT). Pendimethalin at 2.5 kg/ha resulted in 33 to 38% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2011, oryzalin (1.68 kg/ha), dithiopyr (0.56 kg/ha), prodiamine (0.73 kg/ha), and dimethenamid (1.68 kg/ha) applications resulted in 21 to 25% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2012, bermudagrass exhibited similar recovery in response to prodiamine and oryzalin (24 and 26%, respectively), while response to dithiopyr and dimethenamid was 33 and 34%, respectively, 14 WAT. Bermudagrass exhibited the least amount of recovery (13 to 14%) in response to indaziflam at 0.035 kg/ha, regardless of year. Oxadiazon can be safely used as a PRE option when bermudagrass is recovering from SDS, while the use of oryzalin, prodiamine, dithiopyr, dimethenamid, pendimethalin, and indaziflam may limit recovery and further contribute to a weakened turfgrass system.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Preemergence Herbicides on the Recovery of Bermudagrass from Spring Dead Spot\",\"authors\":\"L. L. Beck,&nbsp;T. Cooper,&nbsp;A. J. Hephner,&nbsp;C. M. Straw,&nbsp;G. M. Henry\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Field experiments were conducted in Texas to examine the recovery of a bermudagrass [<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> × <i>C. transvaalensis</i> (L.) Pers.] fairway from spring dead spot (SDS) disease following preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications. In 2011 and 2012 bermudagrass recovery from SDS in the non-treated check plots (46 and 59%, respectively) was similar to bermudagrass recovery in response to oxadiazon at 3.4 kg/ha (55 and 57%, respectively) 14 weeks after treatment (WAT). Pendimethalin at 2.5 kg/ha resulted in 33 to 38% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2011, oryzalin (1.68 kg/ha), dithiopyr (0.56 kg/ha), prodiamine (0.73 kg/ha), and dimethenamid (1.68 kg/ha) applications resulted in 21 to 25% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2012, bermudagrass exhibited similar recovery in response to prodiamine and oryzalin (24 and 26%, respectively), while response to dithiopyr and dimethenamid was 33 and 34%, respectively, 14 WAT. Bermudagrass exhibited the least amount of recovery (13 to 14%) in response to indaziflam at 0.035 kg/ha, regardless of year. Oxadiazon can be safely used as a PRE option when bermudagrass is recovering from SDS, while the use of oryzalin, prodiamine, dithiopyr, dimethenamid, pendimethalin, and indaziflam may limit recovery and further contribute to a weakened turfgrass system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Turfgrass Science\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Turfgrass Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Turfgrass Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在德克萨斯州进行了实地试验,研究了百慕大草(Cynodon dactylon × C. transvaalensis)的恢复情况。珀耳斯。在出现前(PRE)除草剂施用后,球道免受春季死斑(SDS)病的影响。2011年和2012年,未处理的对照区SDS的百德草恢复率(分别为46%和59%)与处理后14周(WAT) 3.4 kg/ha(分别为55%和57%)的百德草恢复率相似。施用2.5 kg/ha的二甲甲烷可使SDS - 14 WAT的百慕大草回收率达到33% ~ 38%。2011年,在SDS - 14 WAT中,使用米草灵(1.68公斤/公顷)、双硫吡虫啉(0.56公斤/公顷)、丙二胺(0.73公斤/公顷)和二甲氰胺(1.68公斤/公顷),百慕草的回收率为21%至25%。2012年,百米草对丙二胺和谷氨酰胺的应答率相似(分别为24%和26%),而对硫吡菌酯和二甲胺的应答率分别为33%和34% (14 WAT)。在0.035 kg/ha的indaziflam处理下,百慕大草的回收率最低(13% ~ 14%),与年份无关。当百慕大草从SDS中恢复时,可以安全地使用恶二唑作为PRE的选择,而使用米扎林、丙二胺、双硫吡醇、二甲脒、苯二甲基灵和吲唑氟可能会限制恢复,并进一步导致草坪草系统的削弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Preemergence Herbicides on the Recovery of Bermudagrass from Spring Dead Spot

Field experiments were conducted in Texas to examine the recovery of a bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon × C. transvaalensis (L.) Pers.] fairway from spring dead spot (SDS) disease following preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications. In 2011 and 2012 bermudagrass recovery from SDS in the non-treated check plots (46 and 59%, respectively) was similar to bermudagrass recovery in response to oxadiazon at 3.4 kg/ha (55 and 57%, respectively) 14 weeks after treatment (WAT). Pendimethalin at 2.5 kg/ha resulted in 33 to 38% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2011, oryzalin (1.68 kg/ha), dithiopyr (0.56 kg/ha), prodiamine (0.73 kg/ha), and dimethenamid (1.68 kg/ha) applications resulted in 21 to 25% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2012, bermudagrass exhibited similar recovery in response to prodiamine and oryzalin (24 and 26%, respectively), while response to dithiopyr and dimethenamid was 33 and 34%, respectively, 14 WAT. Bermudagrass exhibited the least amount of recovery (13 to 14%) in response to indaziflam at 0.035 kg/ha, regardless of year. Oxadiazon can be safely used as a PRE option when bermudagrass is recovering from SDS, while the use of oryzalin, prodiamine, dithiopyr, dimethenamid, pendimethalin, and indaziflam may limit recovery and further contribute to a weakened turfgrass system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信