不文明和孤独在职业健康结果中的相对重要性。

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Declan O Gilmer, Vicki J Magley, Alicia G Dugan, Sara Namazi, Martin G Cherniack
{"title":"不文明和孤独在职业健康结果中的相对重要性。","authors":"Declan O Gilmer, Vicki J Magley, Alicia G Dugan, Sara Namazi, Martin G Cherniack","doi":"10.1007/s41542-023-00145-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers have studied loneliness as a modern health epidemic which is associated with myriad negative health effects, yet the literature lacks evidence of loneliness' correlates, including incivility, in the workplace. This paper not only replicates previous work on incivility, a pervasive interpersonal workplace stressor, it also contributes novel findings on the relative importance of loneliness in explaining variance in occupational health outcomes. We tested hypotheses using two cross-sectional datasets containing data from the general working population (Sample 1) and state corrections supervisors (Sample 2). Through relative importance analyses, including relative weights analysis, we found that both general and workplace loneliness explain substantial variance in several outcomes (e.g., emotional exhaustion, depression symptoms, and turnover intentions) relative to the variance explained by workplace incivility. When controlling for perceived work stress, general loneliness appears to be more important than incivility in explaining variance in emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, and depression symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative Importance of Incivility and Loneliness in Occupational Health Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Declan O Gilmer, Vicki J Magley, Alicia G Dugan, Sara Namazi, Martin G Cherniack\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41542-023-00145-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Researchers have studied loneliness as a modern health epidemic which is associated with myriad negative health effects, yet the literature lacks evidence of loneliness' correlates, including incivility, in the workplace. This paper not only replicates previous work on incivility, a pervasive interpersonal workplace stressor, it also contributes novel findings on the relative importance of loneliness in explaining variance in occupational health outcomes. We tested hypotheses using two cross-sectional datasets containing data from the general working population (Sample 1) and state corrections supervisors (Sample 2). Through relative importance analyses, including relative weights analysis, we found that both general and workplace loneliness explain substantial variance in several outcomes (e.g., emotional exhaustion, depression symptoms, and turnover intentions) relative to the variance explained by workplace incivility. When controlling for perceived work stress, general loneliness appears to be more important than incivility in explaining variance in emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, and depression symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational Health Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910234/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00145-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00145-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员已经将孤独感作为一种现代健康流行病进行了研究,它与无数负面健康影响有关,但文献中缺乏孤独感相关因素的证据,包括工作场所中的不礼貌行为。本文不仅重复了之前关于工作场所普遍存在的人际关系压力源--不文明行为的研究,还就孤独感在解释职业健康结果差异方面的相对重要性提供了新的发现。我们使用两个横截面数据集对假设进行了检验,这两个数据集包含来自普通工作人群(样本 1)和州惩教主管(样本 2)的数据。通过相对重要性分析(包括相对权重分析),我们发现,相对于工作场所不文明行为所解释的差异,一般孤独感和工作场所孤独感都能解释一些结果(如情绪衰竭、抑郁症状和离职意向)的实质性差异。如果控制感知到的工作压力,在解释情绪衰竭、工作满意度和抑郁症状的差异方面,一般孤独感似乎比不文明行为更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative Importance of Incivility and Loneliness in Occupational Health Outcomes.

Researchers have studied loneliness as a modern health epidemic which is associated with myriad negative health effects, yet the literature lacks evidence of loneliness' correlates, including incivility, in the workplace. This paper not only replicates previous work on incivility, a pervasive interpersonal workplace stressor, it also contributes novel findings on the relative importance of loneliness in explaining variance in occupational health outcomes. We tested hypotheses using two cross-sectional datasets containing data from the general working population (Sample 1) and state corrections supervisors (Sample 2). Through relative importance analyses, including relative weights analysis, we found that both general and workplace loneliness explain substantial variance in several outcomes (e.g., emotional exhaustion, depression symptoms, and turnover intentions) relative to the variance explained by workplace incivility. When controlling for perceived work stress, general loneliness appears to be more important than incivility in explaining variance in emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, and depression symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信