乳糜泻生物标志物检测的一种新型多分析方法的性能评估和对无活检诊断的血清学单独标准的评估。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Camille Leite Novis, Edward Wahl, Eric Camacho, Mary Ann Aure, Michael Mahler, Vijayalakshmi Nandakumar
{"title":"乳糜泻生物标志物检测的一种新型多分析方法的性能评估和对无活检诊断的血清学单独标准的评估。","authors":"Camille Leite Novis, Edward Wahl, Eric Camacho, Mary Ann Aure, Michael Mahler, Vijayalakshmi Nandakumar","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0385-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Serology plays a vital role in celiac disease (CD) diagnosis, and the latest European guidelines advocate for biopsy-free diagnoses in patients with ≥10× the upper limit of normal (ULN) of anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To assess performance characteristics of a novel automated particle-based multianalyte technology (Aptiva) for anti-tTG and anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibody detection as compared to the traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (QUANTA Lite). Performance characteristics of the ≥10× ULN anti-tTG IgA criteria for serologic diagnosis of CD were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Sera samples from 703 patients were tested for anti-tTG IgA, anti-tTG immunoglobulin G (IgG), anti-DGP IgA, and anti-DGP IgG antibodies on both platforms. In total, 127 patients had medical information and were classified as CD-positive (n = 58) and CD-negative (n = 69) based on biopsy results. Clinical performance characteristics were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Anti-tTG IgA detection showed equal clinical sensitivity and specificity of 91% sensitivity and 99% specificity on both platforms. Anti-tTG IgG resulted in moderate sensitivity of 69% and 72%, but high specificity of 100% and 94% on Aptiva and QUANTA Lite, respectively. Anti-DGP IgG displayed comparable sensitivity of 90% and 81%, and a specificity of 94% and 99%, on Aptiva and QUANTA Lite, respectively. Anti-DGP IgA demonstrated greater sensitivity on QUANTA Lite (83%) than Aptiva (69%) and similar specificities of 97% and 98% on QUANTA Lite and Aptiva, respectively. At ≥10× ULN levels for anti-tTG IgA, Aptiva displayed a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 100%, and QUANTA Lite showed a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Aptiva is a reliable method to measure CD biomarkers with reduced hands-on necessity and high-throughput capabilities. This study supports the use of a ≥10× ULN anti-tTG IgA biopsy-free approach for serologic diagnosis of CD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Assessment of a Novel Multianalyte Methodology for Celiac Disease Biomarker Detection and Evaluation of the Serology-Alone Criteria for Biopsy-Free Diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Camille Leite Novis, Edward Wahl, Eric Camacho, Mary Ann Aure, Michael Mahler, Vijayalakshmi Nandakumar\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2022-0385-OA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Serology plays a vital role in celiac disease (CD) diagnosis, and the latest European guidelines advocate for biopsy-free diagnoses in patients with ≥10× the upper limit of normal (ULN) of anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To assess performance characteristics of a novel automated particle-based multianalyte technology (Aptiva) for anti-tTG and anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibody detection as compared to the traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (QUANTA Lite). Performance characteristics of the ≥10× ULN anti-tTG IgA criteria for serologic diagnosis of CD were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Sera samples from 703 patients were tested for anti-tTG IgA, anti-tTG immunoglobulin G (IgG), anti-DGP IgA, and anti-DGP IgG antibodies on both platforms. In total, 127 patients had medical information and were classified as CD-positive (n = 58) and CD-negative (n = 69) based on biopsy results. Clinical performance characteristics were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Anti-tTG IgA detection showed equal clinical sensitivity and specificity of 91% sensitivity and 99% specificity on both platforms. Anti-tTG IgG resulted in moderate sensitivity of 69% and 72%, but high specificity of 100% and 94% on Aptiva and QUANTA Lite, respectively. Anti-DGP IgG displayed comparable sensitivity of 90% and 81%, and a specificity of 94% and 99%, on Aptiva and QUANTA Lite, respectively. Anti-DGP IgA demonstrated greater sensitivity on QUANTA Lite (83%) than Aptiva (69%) and similar specificities of 97% and 98% on QUANTA Lite and Aptiva, respectively. At ≥10× ULN levels for anti-tTG IgA, Aptiva displayed a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 100%, and QUANTA Lite showed a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Aptiva is a reliable method to measure CD biomarkers with reduced hands-on necessity and high-throughput capabilities. This study supports the use of a ≥10× ULN anti-tTG IgA biopsy-free approach for serologic diagnosis of CD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0385-OA\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0385-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上下文。-:血清学在乳糜泻(CD)的诊断中起着至关重要的作用,最新的欧洲指南提倡对抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶(tTG)免疫球蛋白a (IgA)抗体的正常上限(ULN)≥10倍的患者进行无活检诊断。-:与传统的酶联免疫吸附测定法(QUANTA Lite)相比,评估一种新型自动颗粒多分析技术(Aptiva)用于抗ttg和抗脱酰胺麦胶蛋白肽(DGP)抗体检测的性能特征。评估≥10× ULN抗ttg IgA血清学诊断CD标准的性能特征。-: 703例患者的血清样本在两个平台上检测抗ttg IgA、抗ttg免疫球蛋白G (IgG)、抗dgp IgA和抗dgp IgG抗体。共有127例患者有医疗信息,根据活检结果分为cd阳性(n = 58)和cd阴性(n = 69)。评估临床表现特征。-: Anti-tTG IgA检测在两个平台上的临床敏感性和特异性相同,灵敏度为91%,特异性为99%。抗ttg IgG对Aptiva和QUANTA Lite的中等敏感性分别为69%和72%,但对Aptiva和QUANTA Lite的特异性分别为100%和94%。抗- dgp IgG在Aptiva和QUANTA Lite上的敏感性分别为90%和81%,特异性分别为94%和99%。Anti-DGP IgA在QUANTA Lite上的敏感性(83%)高于Aptiva(69%),在QUANTA Lite和Aptiva上的特异性分别为97%和98%。在≥10倍ULN水平下,Aptiva检测抗ttg IgA的灵敏度为72%,特异性为100%,QUANTA Lite检测灵敏度为69%,特异性为100%。-: Aptiva是一种可靠的方法来测量CD生物标志物,减少了动手的必要性和高通量能力。本研究支持使用≥10倍ULN抗ttg IgA无活检方法进行CD的血清学诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Assessment of a Novel Multianalyte Methodology for Celiac Disease Biomarker Detection and Evaluation of the Serology-Alone Criteria for Biopsy-Free Diagnosis.

Context.—: Serology plays a vital role in celiac disease (CD) diagnosis, and the latest European guidelines advocate for biopsy-free diagnoses in patients with ≥10× the upper limit of normal (ULN) of anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies.

Objective.—: To assess performance characteristics of a novel automated particle-based multianalyte technology (Aptiva) for anti-tTG and anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibody detection as compared to the traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (QUANTA Lite). Performance characteristics of the ≥10× ULN anti-tTG IgA criteria for serologic diagnosis of CD were also evaluated.

Design.—: Sera samples from 703 patients were tested for anti-tTG IgA, anti-tTG immunoglobulin G (IgG), anti-DGP IgA, and anti-DGP IgG antibodies on both platforms. In total, 127 patients had medical information and were classified as CD-positive (n = 58) and CD-negative (n = 69) based on biopsy results. Clinical performance characteristics were evaluated.

Results.—: Anti-tTG IgA detection showed equal clinical sensitivity and specificity of 91% sensitivity and 99% specificity on both platforms. Anti-tTG IgG resulted in moderate sensitivity of 69% and 72%, but high specificity of 100% and 94% on Aptiva and QUANTA Lite, respectively. Anti-DGP IgG displayed comparable sensitivity of 90% and 81%, and a specificity of 94% and 99%, on Aptiva and QUANTA Lite, respectively. Anti-DGP IgA demonstrated greater sensitivity on QUANTA Lite (83%) than Aptiva (69%) and similar specificities of 97% and 98% on QUANTA Lite and Aptiva, respectively. At ≥10× ULN levels for anti-tTG IgA, Aptiva displayed a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 100%, and QUANTA Lite showed a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100%.

Conclusions.—: Aptiva is a reliable method to measure CD biomarkers with reduced hands-on necessity and high-throughput capabilities. This study supports the use of a ≥10× ULN anti-tTG IgA biopsy-free approach for serologic diagnosis of CD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信