Young-Min Kim, Jong-Bin Lee, Heung-Sik Um, Beom-Seok Chang, Jae-Kwan Lee
{"title":"种植体-基台连接方式对种植体边缘骨流失及存活的长期影响。","authors":"Young-Min Kim, Jong-Bin Lee, Heung-Sik Um, Beom-Seok Chang, Jae-Kwan Lee","doi":"10.5051/jpis.2200960048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the long-term survival rate and peri-implant marginal bone loss between different types of dental implant-abutment connections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implants with external or internal abutment connections, which were fitted at Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital from November 2011 to December 2015 and followed up for >5 years, were retrospectively investigated. Cumulative survival rates were evaluated for >5 years, and peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated at 1- and 5-year follow-up examinations after functional loading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 8-year cumulative survival rates were 93.3% and 90.7% in the external and internal connection types, respectively (<i>P</i>=0.353). The mean values of marginal bone loss were 1.23 mm (external) and 0.72 mm (internal) (<i>P</i><0.001) after 1 year of loading, and 1.20 mm and 1.00 mm for external and internal abutment connections, respectively (<i>P=</i>0.137) after 5 years. Implant length (longer, <i>P</i>=0.018), smoking status (heavy, <i>P</i>=0.001), and prosthetic type (bridge, <i>P</i>=0.004) were associated with significantly greater marginal bone loss, and the use of screw-cement-retained prosthesis was significantly associated (<i>P</i>=0.027) with less marginal bone loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rate between implants with external and internal abutment connections. After 1 year of loading, marginal bone loss was greater around the implants with an external abutment connection. However, no significant difference between the external and internal connection groups was found after 5 years. Both types of abutment connections are viable treatment options for the reconstruction of partially edentulous ridges.</p>","PeriodicalId":48795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","volume":"52 6","pages":"496-508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/03/de/jpis-52-496.PMC9807847.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term effect of implant-abutment connection type on marginal bone loss and survival of dental implants.\",\"authors\":\"Young-Min Kim, Jong-Bin Lee, Heung-Sik Um, Beom-Seok Chang, Jae-Kwan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5051/jpis.2200960048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the long-term survival rate and peri-implant marginal bone loss between different types of dental implant-abutment connections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implants with external or internal abutment connections, which were fitted at Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital from November 2011 to December 2015 and followed up for >5 years, were retrospectively investigated. Cumulative survival rates were evaluated for >5 years, and peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated at 1- and 5-year follow-up examinations after functional loading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 8-year cumulative survival rates were 93.3% and 90.7% in the external and internal connection types, respectively (<i>P</i>=0.353). The mean values of marginal bone loss were 1.23 mm (external) and 0.72 mm (internal) (<i>P</i><0.001) after 1 year of loading, and 1.20 mm and 1.00 mm for external and internal abutment connections, respectively (<i>P=</i>0.137) after 5 years. Implant length (longer, <i>P</i>=0.018), smoking status (heavy, <i>P</i>=0.001), and prosthetic type (bridge, <i>P</i>=0.004) were associated with significantly greater marginal bone loss, and the use of screw-cement-retained prosthesis was significantly associated (<i>P</i>=0.027) with less marginal bone loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rate between implants with external and internal abutment connections. After 1 year of loading, marginal bone loss was greater around the implants with an external abutment connection. However, no significant difference between the external and internal connection groups was found after 5 years. Both types of abutment connections are viable treatment options for the reconstruction of partially edentulous ridges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"496-508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/03/de/jpis-52-496.PMC9807847.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2200960048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2200960048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term effect of implant-abutment connection type on marginal bone loss and survival of dental implants.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the long-term survival rate and peri-implant marginal bone loss between different types of dental implant-abutment connections.
Methods: Implants with external or internal abutment connections, which were fitted at Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital from November 2011 to December 2015 and followed up for >5 years, were retrospectively investigated. Cumulative survival rates were evaluated for >5 years, and peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated at 1- and 5-year follow-up examinations after functional loading.
Results: The 8-year cumulative survival rates were 93.3% and 90.7% in the external and internal connection types, respectively (P=0.353). The mean values of marginal bone loss were 1.23 mm (external) and 0.72 mm (internal) (P<0.001) after 1 year of loading, and 1.20 mm and 1.00 mm for external and internal abutment connections, respectively (P=0.137) after 5 years. Implant length (longer, P=0.018), smoking status (heavy, P=0.001), and prosthetic type (bridge, P=0.004) were associated with significantly greater marginal bone loss, and the use of screw-cement-retained prosthesis was significantly associated (P=0.027) with less marginal bone loss.
Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rate between implants with external and internal abutment connections. After 1 year of loading, marginal bone loss was greater around the implants with an external abutment connection. However, no significant difference between the external and internal connection groups was found after 5 years. Both types of abutment connections are viable treatment options for the reconstruction of partially edentulous ridges.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (JPIS) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal providing up-to-date information relevant to professionalism of periodontology and dental implantology. JPIS is dedicated to global and extensive publication which includes evidence-based original articles, and fundamental reviews in order to cover a variety of interests in the field of periodontal as well as implant science.