使用无鞘 Eaucath 是克服抗药性严重桡动脉痉挛的有效策略。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2023-02-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/2434516
Andrew Borrie, Aditya Raina, Sarah Fairley, Anil Ranchord, Scott A Harding
{"title":"使用无鞘 Eaucath 是克服抗药性严重桡动脉痉挛的有效策略。","authors":"Andrew Borrie, Aditya Raina, Sarah Fairley, Anil Ranchord, Scott A Harding","doi":"10.1155/2023/2434516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the sheathless Eaucath guiding catheter (SEGC) in overcoming severe spasm.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Radial spasm is a frequent challenge in transradial access (TRA) and can be difficult to manage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective observational study of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with primary transfemoral access (TFA) or primary use of a sheathless guide catheter were excluded. Patients who developed angiographically confirmed severe spasm were treated with further sedation and vasodilators. If the conventional catheter would still not advance, it was exchanged for a SEGC. The primary endpoint was the successful passage of the SEGC through the radial with successful engagement of the coronary artery in patients with resistant severe spasm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary TFA access was used in 58 (5.8%) and primary radial access with a SEGC in 44 (4.4%) patients. Of the remaining 898 patients, 888 (98.9%) had a radial sheath successfully inserted. Of these, 49 (5.5%) developed severe radial spasm with inability to advance the catheter. Following treatment with additional sedation and vasodilators, the severe spasm resolved in 5 (10.2%) patients. Passage of a SEGC was attempted in the remaining 44 patients with resistant severe spasm. Passage of the SEGC and engagement of coronary arteries were successful in all cases. There were no complications related to use of the SEGC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that use of the SEGC for resistant severe spasm is highly effective, safe, and may reduce the need for conversion to TFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"2434516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of the Sheathless Eaucath Is an Effective Strategy to Overcome Resistant Severe Radial Spasm.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Borrie, Aditya Raina, Sarah Fairley, Anil Ranchord, Scott A Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/2434516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the sheathless Eaucath guiding catheter (SEGC) in overcoming severe spasm.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Radial spasm is a frequent challenge in transradial access (TRA) and can be difficult to manage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective observational study of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with primary transfemoral access (TFA) or primary use of a sheathless guide catheter were excluded. Patients who developed angiographically confirmed severe spasm were treated with further sedation and vasodilators. If the conventional catheter would still not advance, it was exchanged for a SEGC. The primary endpoint was the successful passage of the SEGC through the radial with successful engagement of the coronary artery in patients with resistant severe spasm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary TFA access was used in 58 (5.8%) and primary radial access with a SEGC in 44 (4.4%) patients. Of the remaining 898 patients, 888 (98.9%) had a radial sheath successfully inserted. Of these, 49 (5.5%) developed severe radial spasm with inability to advance the catheter. Following treatment with additional sedation and vasodilators, the severe spasm resolved in 5 (10.2%) patients. Passage of a SEGC was attempted in the remaining 44 patients with resistant severe spasm. Passage of the SEGC and engagement of coronary arteries were successful in all cases. There were no complications related to use of the SEGC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that use of the SEGC for resistant severe spasm is highly effective, safe, and may reduce the need for conversion to TFA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional cardiology\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"2434516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9977557/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2434516\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2434516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们旨在评估无鞘Eaucath导引导管(SEGC)在克服严重痉挛方面的有效性:背景:桡动脉痉挛是经桡动脉入路(TRA)中经常遇到的难题,而且很难处理:我们对 1000 名连续接受或未接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠状动脉造影术患者进行了前瞻性观察研究。排除了初次经股动脉入路(TFA)或初次使用无鞘导引导管的患者。经血管造影证实出现严重痉挛的患者将接受进一步镇静和血管扩张剂治疗。如果传统导管仍无法前进,则更换为 SEGC。主要终点是 SEGC 顺利通过桡动脉,并成功接合重度痉挛患者的冠状动脉:58例(5.8%)患者使用了原发性TFA入路,44例(4.4%)患者使用了带SEGC的原发性桡动脉入路。在剩余的 898 位患者中,有 888 位(98.9%)成功插入了桡动脉鞘。其中,49 例(5.5%)患者出现严重的桡动脉痉挛,无法推进导管。在使用额外镇静剂和血管扩张剂治疗后,5 名(10.2%)患者的严重痉挛症状得到缓解。在其余 44 位有严重痉挛的患者中,我们尝试为他们通过 SEGC。所有病例都成功通过了SEGC并接合了冠状动脉。没有出现与使用SEGC相关的并发症:我们的研究结果表明,使用SEGC治疗耐药重度痉挛非常有效、安全,并可减少转为TFA的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of the Sheathless Eaucath Is an Effective Strategy to Overcome Resistant Severe Radial Spasm.

Use of the Sheathless Eaucath Is an Effective Strategy to Overcome Resistant Severe Radial Spasm.

Use of the Sheathless Eaucath Is an Effective Strategy to Overcome Resistant Severe Radial Spasm.

Objectives: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the sheathless Eaucath guiding catheter (SEGC) in overcoming severe spasm.

Background: Radial spasm is a frequent challenge in transradial access (TRA) and can be difficult to manage.

Methods: We performed a prospective observational study of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with primary transfemoral access (TFA) or primary use of a sheathless guide catheter were excluded. Patients who developed angiographically confirmed severe spasm were treated with further sedation and vasodilators. If the conventional catheter would still not advance, it was exchanged for a SEGC. The primary endpoint was the successful passage of the SEGC through the radial with successful engagement of the coronary artery in patients with resistant severe spasm.

Results: Primary TFA access was used in 58 (5.8%) and primary radial access with a SEGC in 44 (4.4%) patients. Of the remaining 898 patients, 888 (98.9%) had a radial sheath successfully inserted. Of these, 49 (5.5%) developed severe radial spasm with inability to advance the catheter. Following treatment with additional sedation and vasodilators, the severe spasm resolved in 5 (10.2%) patients. Passage of a SEGC was attempted in the remaining 44 patients with resistant severe spasm. Passage of the SEGC and engagement of coronary arteries were successful in all cases. There were no complications related to use of the SEGC.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that use of the SEGC for resistant severe spasm is highly effective, safe, and may reduce the need for conversion to TFA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信