生物试剂哨兵2.0诱捕法和人登陆捕法计算人咬人率的效率。

Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.2987/22-7078
Zoltán Kenyeres, Lőrinc Andrási, Péter Kovács, András Márkus, Tamás Sáringer-Kenyeres
{"title":"生物试剂哨兵2.0诱捕法和人登陆捕法计算人咬人率的效率。","authors":"Zoltán Kenyeres,&nbsp;Lőrinc Andrási,&nbsp;Péter Kovács,&nbsp;András Márkus,&nbsp;Tamás Sáringer-Kenyeres","doi":"10.2987/22-7078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To calculate human biting rates for various mosquito species, we performed simultaneous collections for 15 wk at 6 ecologically variable sites in Hungary. Of the dominant species, the relative abundance of Aedes vexans, Ae. sticticus, and Coquillettidia richiardii showed a significant positive correlation between CO2 + Biogents lure and human landing catch (HLC). The relative abundance of Culex pipiens was significantly lower in the HLC samples than in the CO2 + BG lure samples. Of the invasive species, Aedes korecius was found more frequently in HLC, while Ae. japonicus was more common in CO2 + BG lure samples. Estimated human biting rates, determined with the 2 collection methods, showed no significant differences at high mosquito density (100-120 bites/h/person), but there was considerable variation at low mosquito biting rates. Therefore, correcting the CO2 + BG lure trapping data to include only species biting humans provides estimates approaching the values of the HLC. Our study confirmed that while HLC is the gold standard method for determining the human biting rate, provided appropriate data adjustments are made, trapping methods performing automated data collection can provide similar data while reducing the exposure of the data collector.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficiency of Biogents Sentinel 2.0 Trapping and Human-Landing Catching Methods to Calculate Human Biting Rates.\",\"authors\":\"Zoltán Kenyeres,&nbsp;Lőrinc Andrási,&nbsp;Péter Kovács,&nbsp;András Márkus,&nbsp;Tamás Sáringer-Kenyeres\",\"doi\":\"10.2987/22-7078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To calculate human biting rates for various mosquito species, we performed simultaneous collections for 15 wk at 6 ecologically variable sites in Hungary. Of the dominant species, the relative abundance of Aedes vexans, Ae. sticticus, and Coquillettidia richiardii showed a significant positive correlation between CO2 + Biogents lure and human landing catch (HLC). The relative abundance of Culex pipiens was significantly lower in the HLC samples than in the CO2 + BG lure samples. Of the invasive species, Aedes korecius was found more frequently in HLC, while Ae. japonicus was more common in CO2 + BG lure samples. Estimated human biting rates, determined with the 2 collection methods, showed no significant differences at high mosquito density (100-120 bites/h/person), but there was considerable variation at low mosquito biting rates. Therefore, correcting the CO2 + BG lure trapping data to include only species biting humans provides estimates approaching the values of the HLC. Our study confirmed that while HLC is the gold standard method for determining the human biting rate, provided appropriate data adjustments are made, trapping methods performing automated data collection can provide similar data while reducing the exposure of the data collector.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2987/22-7078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2987/22-7078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了计算各种蚊子的人类叮咬率,我们在匈牙利6个生态变化点同时进行了15周的采集。在优势种中,烦伊蚊、伊蚊和伊蚊的相对丰度较低。Coquillettidia richardii和sticticus在CO2 +生物诱捕剂与人类着陆捕获(HLC)之间呈显著正相关。hplc诱蚊剂中库蚊的相对丰度明显低于CO2 + BG诱蚊剂。入侵种中,海南以科伊蚊居多,海南以伊蚊居多。在CO2 + BG诱捕物中,日本刺参较为常见。两种采集方法测定的人类叮咬率估算结果显示,蚊虫密度高(100-120次/小时/人)时,蚊虫叮咬率无显著差异,蚊虫叮咬率低时差异较大。因此,校正CO2 + BG诱捕数据,使其只包括叮咬人类的物种,提供的估计值接近HLC值。我们的研究证实,虽然hplc是确定人类咬人率的金标准方法,但只要进行适当的数据调整,执行自动数据收集的诱捕方法可以提供类似的数据,同时减少数据收集器的暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
The Efficiency of Biogents Sentinel 2.0 Trapping and Human-Landing Catching Methods to Calculate Human Biting Rates.

To calculate human biting rates for various mosquito species, we performed simultaneous collections for 15 wk at 6 ecologically variable sites in Hungary. Of the dominant species, the relative abundance of Aedes vexans, Ae. sticticus, and Coquillettidia richiardii showed a significant positive correlation between CO2 + Biogents lure and human landing catch (HLC). The relative abundance of Culex pipiens was significantly lower in the HLC samples than in the CO2 + BG lure samples. Of the invasive species, Aedes korecius was found more frequently in HLC, while Ae. japonicus was more common in CO2 + BG lure samples. Estimated human biting rates, determined with the 2 collection methods, showed no significant differences at high mosquito density (100-120 bites/h/person), but there was considerable variation at low mosquito biting rates. Therefore, correcting the CO2 + BG lure trapping data to include only species biting humans provides estimates approaching the values of the HLC. Our study confirmed that while HLC is the gold standard method for determining the human biting rate, provided appropriate data adjustments are made, trapping methods performing automated data collection can provide similar data while reducing the exposure of the data collector.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信