影响住院患者结肠镜下肠准备质量的因素。

Shiva Poola, Nannaya Jampala, Dmitry Tumin, Eslam Ali
{"title":"影响住院患者结肠镜下肠准备质量的因素。","authors":"Shiva Poola,&nbsp;Nannaya Jampala,&nbsp;Dmitry Tumin,&nbsp;Eslam Ali","doi":"10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02657-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopy is highly sensitive for the visualization of the entire colon. Inpatient colonoscopies pose a special risk of poor preparation. We reviewed bowel preparation methods and patient factors to identify predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for inpatient colonoscopy at our institution. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict inadequate bowel preparation for inpatient colonoscopies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients ages >18 years of age undergoing inpatient colonoscopy in 2017-2018 were reviewed. The primary outcome was inadequate bowel preparation and secondary outcomes were successful cecal intubation, duration of colonoscopy, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Outcomes were compared using multivariable regression with stepwise covariate selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 315 patients (median age =67 years; 45% female). Visualization was deemed adequate in 56%, fair in 27%, and poor in 17% of cases. Cecal intubation was successful in 84% of cases. The median duration of colonoscopy was 25 min and LOS was 2 days. Unsuccessful cecal intubation was most likely with poor visualization compared to adequate visualization (36% vs. 11%, P=0.014). There was no increased colonoscopy duration with poor visualization (P=0.075). There was no significant LOS with worse visualization quality (P=0.185). Factors predicting worse visualization quality included older age, history of congestive heart failure (CHF), cirrhosis, and motility disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At our institution, patients who were older or had significant comorbid conditions (chronic artery disease, CHF, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, motility disorders, or cirrhosis) were more likely to have inadequate inpatient bowel preparation. Bowel preparation type did not affect the duration, quality of visualization, or successful cecal intubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74201,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica","volume":"66 3","pages":"194-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing inpatient colonoscopy bowel preparation quality.\",\"authors\":\"Shiva Poola,&nbsp;Nannaya Jampala,&nbsp;Dmitry Tumin,&nbsp;Eslam Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02657-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopy is highly sensitive for the visualization of the entire colon. Inpatient colonoscopies pose a special risk of poor preparation. We reviewed bowel preparation methods and patient factors to identify predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for inpatient colonoscopy at our institution. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict inadequate bowel preparation for inpatient colonoscopies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients ages >18 years of age undergoing inpatient colonoscopy in 2017-2018 were reviewed. The primary outcome was inadequate bowel preparation and secondary outcomes were successful cecal intubation, duration of colonoscopy, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Outcomes were compared using multivariable regression with stepwise covariate selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 315 patients (median age =67 years; 45% female). Visualization was deemed adequate in 56%, fair in 27%, and poor in 17% of cases. Cecal intubation was successful in 84% of cases. The median duration of colonoscopy was 25 min and LOS was 2 days. Unsuccessful cecal intubation was most likely with poor visualization compared to adequate visualization (36% vs. 11%, P=0.014). There was no increased colonoscopy duration with poor visualization (P=0.075). There was no significant LOS with worse visualization quality (P=0.185). Factors predicting worse visualization quality included older age, history of congestive heart failure (CHF), cirrhosis, and motility disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At our institution, patients who were older or had significant comorbid conditions (chronic artery disease, CHF, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, motility disorders, or cirrhosis) were more likely to have inadequate inpatient bowel preparation. Bowel preparation type did not affect the duration, quality of visualization, or successful cecal intubation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"194-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02657-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02657-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:结肠镜检查对整个结肠的显示非常敏感。住院患者结肠镜检查存在准备不良的特殊风险。我们回顾了肠道准备方法和患者因素,以确定我们机构住院结肠镜检查中肠道准备不足的预测因素。本研究的目的是确定预测住院患者结肠镜检查时肠道准备不足的因素。方法:回顾性分析2017-2018年所有年龄>18岁的住院结肠镜检查患者。主要结局是肠道准备不足,次要结局是盲肠插管成功、结肠镜检查持续时间和住院时间(LOS)。采用多变量回归和逐步协变量选择对结果进行比较。结果:分析纳入315例患者(中位年龄=67岁;45%的女性)。56%的人认为可视化是足够的,27%的人认为是一般的,17%的人认为是差的。盲肠插管成功率为84%。结肠镜检查的中位持续时间为25分钟,LOS为2天。盲肠插管失败的最可能原因是视觉效果差,而不是充分的视觉效果(36%对11%,P=0.014)。结肠镜检查时间没有增加,但观察效果不佳(P=0.075)。视觉质量较差,无明显LOS (P=0.185)。预测可视化质量较差的因素包括年龄较大、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)史、肝硬化和运动障碍。结论:在我们的机构,年龄较大或有显著合并症(慢性动脉疾病、慢性心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺病、运动障碍或肝硬化)的患者更有可能在住院期间肠道准备不足。肠道准备类型不影响观察时间、观察质量或盲肠插管成功与否。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors influencing inpatient colonoscopy bowel preparation quality.

Background: Colonoscopy is highly sensitive for the visualization of the entire colon. Inpatient colonoscopies pose a special risk of poor preparation. We reviewed bowel preparation methods and patient factors to identify predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for inpatient colonoscopy at our institution. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict inadequate bowel preparation for inpatient colonoscopies.

Methods: All patients ages >18 years of age undergoing inpatient colonoscopy in 2017-2018 were reviewed. The primary outcome was inadequate bowel preparation and secondary outcomes were successful cecal intubation, duration of colonoscopy, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Outcomes were compared using multivariable regression with stepwise covariate selection.

Results: The analysis included 315 patients (median age =67 years; 45% female). Visualization was deemed adequate in 56%, fair in 27%, and poor in 17% of cases. Cecal intubation was successful in 84% of cases. The median duration of colonoscopy was 25 min and LOS was 2 days. Unsuccessful cecal intubation was most likely with poor visualization compared to adequate visualization (36% vs. 11%, P=0.014). There was no increased colonoscopy duration with poor visualization (P=0.075). There was no significant LOS with worse visualization quality (P=0.185). Factors predicting worse visualization quality included older age, history of congestive heart failure (CHF), cirrhosis, and motility disorders.

Conclusions: At our institution, patients who were older or had significant comorbid conditions (chronic artery disease, CHF, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, motility disorders, or cirrhosis) were more likely to have inadequate inpatient bowel preparation. Bowel preparation type did not affect the duration, quality of visualization, or successful cecal intubation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信