为生物和生物医学领域的博士生提供研究生产力和培训支持

IF 2.5 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Michael D. Schaller
{"title":"为生物和生物医学领域的博士生提供研究生产力和培训支持","authors":"Michael D. Schaller","doi":"10.1096/fba.2022-00117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Training of doctoral students as part of the next generation of the biomedical workforce is essential for sustaining the scientific enterprise in the United States. Training primarily occurs at institutions of higher education, and these trainees comprise an important part of the workforce at these institutions. Federal investment in the support of doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences is distributed differently than the distribution of students across different types of institutions, for example, public vs private. Institutions in states that historically receive less federal support for research also receive less support for doctoral student training. Doctorates at different types of institution exhibit little difference in research productivity, with the exception of citations, and subsequent receipt of additional NIH awards. Thus, training outcomes, which are related to the quality of the student and training environment, are similar across different institutions. Research productivity of doctoral students does not correlate with the number of F31s awarded to an institution. Factors that correlate with F31 funding include R01 funding levels and program size. The findings suggest strategies for institutions to increase success at securing F31s and modification of policy to promote more equitable distribution of F31s across institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12093,"journal":{"name":"FASEB bioAdvances","volume":"5 3","pages":"131-148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/11/FBA2-5-131.PMC9983073.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research productivity and training support for doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences\",\"authors\":\"Michael D. Schaller\",\"doi\":\"10.1096/fba.2022-00117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Training of doctoral students as part of the next generation of the biomedical workforce is essential for sustaining the scientific enterprise in the United States. Training primarily occurs at institutions of higher education, and these trainees comprise an important part of the workforce at these institutions. Federal investment in the support of doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences is distributed differently than the distribution of students across different types of institutions, for example, public vs private. Institutions in states that historically receive less federal support for research also receive less support for doctoral student training. Doctorates at different types of institution exhibit little difference in research productivity, with the exception of citations, and subsequent receipt of additional NIH awards. Thus, training outcomes, which are related to the quality of the student and training environment, are similar across different institutions. Research productivity of doctoral students does not correlate with the number of F31s awarded to an institution. Factors that correlate with F31 funding include R01 funding levels and program size. The findings suggest strategies for institutions to increase success at securing F31s and modification of policy to promote more equitable distribution of F31s across institutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FASEB bioAdvances\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"131-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/11/FBA2-5-131.PMC9983073.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FASEB bioAdvances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1096/fba.2022-00117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FASEB bioAdvances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1096/fba.2022-00117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

培养博士生成为下一代生物医学工作人员的一部分,对于维持美国的科学事业至关重要。培训主要在高等教育机构进行,这些受训人员构成了这些机构劳动力的重要组成部分。联邦政府在支持生物和生物医学领域博士生方面的投资与学生在不同类型院校(例如公立与私立院校)的分布情况不同。历史上得到较少联邦研究支持的州的机构在博士生培训方面也得到较少的支持。不同类型机构的博士在研究生产力方面几乎没有差异,除了引用和随后获得的额外NIH奖励。因此,与学生素质和培训环境相关的培训结果在不同院校之间是相似的。博士生的研究效率与授予院校f31的数量无关。与F31资金相关的因素包括R01资金水平和项目规模。研究结果为各机构提供了提高f31保障成功率和修改政策以促进f31在各机构之间更公平分配的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Research productivity and training support for doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences

Research productivity and training support for doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences

Training of doctoral students as part of the next generation of the biomedical workforce is essential for sustaining the scientific enterprise in the United States. Training primarily occurs at institutions of higher education, and these trainees comprise an important part of the workforce at these institutions. Federal investment in the support of doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences is distributed differently than the distribution of students across different types of institutions, for example, public vs private. Institutions in states that historically receive less federal support for research also receive less support for doctoral student training. Doctorates at different types of institution exhibit little difference in research productivity, with the exception of citations, and subsequent receipt of additional NIH awards. Thus, training outcomes, which are related to the quality of the student and training environment, are similar across different institutions. Research productivity of doctoral students does not correlate with the number of F31s awarded to an institution. Factors that correlate with F31 funding include R01 funding levels and program size. The findings suggest strategies for institutions to increase success at securing F31s and modification of policy to promote more equitable distribution of F31s across institutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FASEB bioAdvances
FASEB bioAdvances Multiple-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信