德国第一份社会信息加工开放性量表的编制与验证。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychopathology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000525950
Sophie Charlotte Niestroj, Sarah Steden, Maren Boecker, Edward Stuart Brodkin, Kerstin Konrad
{"title":"德国第一份社会信息加工开放性量表的编制与验证。","authors":"Sophie Charlotte Niestroj,&nbsp;Sarah Steden,&nbsp;Maren Boecker,&nbsp;Edward Stuart Brodkin,&nbsp;Kerstin Konrad","doi":"10.1159/000525950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study introduces the first German Open Scale of Social Information Processing (GOSSIP) and evaluates its psychometric properties. Even though social information processing (SIP) and its important role in developmental psychopathology is a rising field of interest, model-based standardized assessment tools are still scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GOSSIP was developed to assess SI processes in boys and girls aged eight to 21 years. First, 61 vignettes (combinations of pictures and short written descriptions of the situation depicted) were evaluated by an expert group and piloted with 48 healthy participants (aged 8-21). The best-rated vignettes were then implemented in a Web-based application. 191 participants completed GOSSIP. Of those, 76 answered additional questionnaires to assess their social skills and psychopathology. Internal consistencies for the emotional and cognitive GOSSIP scales were determined. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify subgroups of children and adolescents characterized by specific SIP profiles (i.e., patterns of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses to the GOSSIP). Furthermore, the external validity of the participants' attribution tendencies in GOSSIP was evaluated in real life by smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistencies for the emotional and cognitive scales (angry, ashamed, physical aggression, pro-social response, revenge, and outcome expectancy) were good to excellent. The scales of hostile interpretation, relation aggression, sadness, and exclusion showed borderline/acceptable internal consistency. Correlation analysis confirmed convergent validity with self-reported social skills and external validity with ratings of aggressive and pro-social behaviors. The LPA revealed three profiles as the best fit of the data. The first group is named \"aggressors,\" the second \"social-emotional group,\" and a third named \"ashamed-internalizing group.\" However, no significant association was found between the attribution tendencies derived from GOSSIP and EMA data.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>GOSSIP is the first model-based German Web-based assessment for several SIP mechanisms that showed overall adequate psychometric properties. GOSSIP can be used to classify individuals into SIP profiles that differ in terms of their cognitive and emotional response tendencies and therefore could contribute to the development of targeted interventions. Integrating assessments of emotional responses into GOSSIP revealed an important role of \"shame\" in SIP and the development of psychopathology. Furthermore, the lack of external validity between GOSSIP and EMA calls into question how attribution tendencies are best assessed in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20723,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development and Validation of the First German Open Scale of Social Information Processing.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Charlotte Niestroj,&nbsp;Sarah Steden,&nbsp;Maren Boecker,&nbsp;Edward Stuart Brodkin,&nbsp;Kerstin Konrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000525950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study introduces the first German Open Scale of Social Information Processing (GOSSIP) and evaluates its psychometric properties. Even though social information processing (SIP) and its important role in developmental psychopathology is a rising field of interest, model-based standardized assessment tools are still scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GOSSIP was developed to assess SI processes in boys and girls aged eight to 21 years. First, 61 vignettes (combinations of pictures and short written descriptions of the situation depicted) were evaluated by an expert group and piloted with 48 healthy participants (aged 8-21). The best-rated vignettes were then implemented in a Web-based application. 191 participants completed GOSSIP. Of those, 76 answered additional questionnaires to assess their social skills and psychopathology. Internal consistencies for the emotional and cognitive GOSSIP scales were determined. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify subgroups of children and adolescents characterized by specific SIP profiles (i.e., patterns of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses to the GOSSIP). Furthermore, the external validity of the participants' attribution tendencies in GOSSIP was evaluated in real life by smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistencies for the emotional and cognitive scales (angry, ashamed, physical aggression, pro-social response, revenge, and outcome expectancy) were good to excellent. The scales of hostile interpretation, relation aggression, sadness, and exclusion showed borderline/acceptable internal consistency. Correlation analysis confirmed convergent validity with self-reported social skills and external validity with ratings of aggressive and pro-social behaviors. The LPA revealed three profiles as the best fit of the data. The first group is named \\\"aggressors,\\\" the second \\\"social-emotional group,\\\" and a third named \\\"ashamed-internalizing group.\\\" However, no significant association was found between the attribution tendencies derived from GOSSIP and EMA data.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>GOSSIP is the first model-based German Web-based assessment for several SIP mechanisms that showed overall adequate psychometric properties. GOSSIP can be used to classify individuals into SIP profiles that differ in terms of their cognitive and emotional response tendencies and therefore could contribute to the development of targeted interventions. Integrating assessments of emotional responses into GOSSIP revealed an important role of \\\"shame\\\" in SIP and the development of psychopathology. Furthermore, the lack of external validity between GOSSIP and EMA calls into question how attribution tendencies are best assessed in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychopathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525950\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

前言:本研究引入了德国第一套社会信息加工开放量表(GOSSIP),并对其心理测量特性进行了评价。尽管社会信息处理(SIP)及其在发展精神病理学中的重要作用是一个新兴的研究领域,但基于模型的标准化评估工具仍然很少。方法:我们开发了GOSSIP来评估8 - 21岁男孩和女孩的SI过程。首先,由一个专家组评估61个小插图(图片和对所描述情况的简短书面描述的组合),并在48名健康参与者(8-21岁)中进行试点。然后在基于web的应用程序中实现评价最好的小插曲。191名参与者完成了GOSSIP。其中76人回答了额外的问卷,以评估他们的社交技能和精神病理。确定了情感和认知八卦量表的内部一致性。潜在特征分析(LPA)用于确定具有特定SIP特征(即对八卦的情感、认知和行为反应模式)的儿童和青少年亚组。此外,采用基于智能手机的生态瞬间评估(EMA)方法,在现实生活中评估了参与者在GOSSIP中的归因倾向的外部效度。结果:情绪和认知量表(愤怒、羞愧、身体攻击、亲社会反应、报复和结果预期)的内部一致性从好到优。敌意解释量表、关系攻击量表、悲伤量表和排斥量表显示出边缘/可接受的内部一致性。相关分析证实了自我社会技能报告的收敛效度和攻击行为和亲社会行为评分的外部效度。LPA揭示了三个最适合数据的剖面。第一组被称为“侵略者”,第二组被称为“社会情感组”,第三组被称为“羞愧内化组”。然而,由GOSSIP得出的归因倾向与EMA数据之间没有显著的关联。讨论/结论:GOSSIP是第一个基于模型的德国基于网络的对几种SIP机制的评估,这些机制显示出全面充分的心理测量特性。GOSSIP可用于将个体划分为认知和情绪反应倾向不同的SIP概况,从而有助于制定有针对性的干预措施。将情绪反应的评估整合到GOSSIP中,揭示了“羞耻”在SIP和精神病理学发展中的重要作用。此外,GOSSIP和EMA之间缺乏外部效度,这让人们质疑在未来的研究中如何最好地评估归因倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Development and Validation of the First German Open Scale of Social Information Processing.

Introduction: This study introduces the first German Open Scale of Social Information Processing (GOSSIP) and evaluates its psychometric properties. Even though social information processing (SIP) and its important role in developmental psychopathology is a rising field of interest, model-based standardized assessment tools are still scarce.

Methods: GOSSIP was developed to assess SI processes in boys and girls aged eight to 21 years. First, 61 vignettes (combinations of pictures and short written descriptions of the situation depicted) were evaluated by an expert group and piloted with 48 healthy participants (aged 8-21). The best-rated vignettes were then implemented in a Web-based application. 191 participants completed GOSSIP. Of those, 76 answered additional questionnaires to assess their social skills and psychopathology. Internal consistencies for the emotional and cognitive GOSSIP scales were determined. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify subgroups of children and adolescents characterized by specific SIP profiles (i.e., patterns of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses to the GOSSIP). Furthermore, the external validity of the participants' attribution tendencies in GOSSIP was evaluated in real life by smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA).

Results: The internal consistencies for the emotional and cognitive scales (angry, ashamed, physical aggression, pro-social response, revenge, and outcome expectancy) were good to excellent. The scales of hostile interpretation, relation aggression, sadness, and exclusion showed borderline/acceptable internal consistency. Correlation analysis confirmed convergent validity with self-reported social skills and external validity with ratings of aggressive and pro-social behaviors. The LPA revealed three profiles as the best fit of the data. The first group is named "aggressors," the second "social-emotional group," and a third named "ashamed-internalizing group." However, no significant association was found between the attribution tendencies derived from GOSSIP and EMA data.

Discussion/conclusion: GOSSIP is the first model-based German Web-based assessment for several SIP mechanisms that showed overall adequate psychometric properties. GOSSIP can be used to classify individuals into SIP profiles that differ in terms of their cognitive and emotional response tendencies and therefore could contribute to the development of targeted interventions. Integrating assessments of emotional responses into GOSSIP revealed an important role of "shame" in SIP and the development of psychopathology. Furthermore, the lack of external validity between GOSSIP and EMA calls into question how attribution tendencies are best assessed in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopathology
Psychopathology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Psychopathology'' is a record of research centered on findings, concepts, and diagnostic categories of phenomenological, experimental and clinical psychopathology. Studies published are designed to improve and deepen the knowledge and understanding of the pathogenesis and nature of psychopathological symptoms and psychological dysfunctions. Furthermore, the validity of concepts applied in the neurosciences of mental functions are evaluated in order to closely bring together the mind and the brain. Major topics of the journal are trajectories between biological processes and psychological dysfunction that can help us better understand a subject’s inner experiences and interpersonal behavior. Descriptive psychopathology, experimental psychopathology and neuropsychology, developmental psychopathology, transcultural psychiatry as well as philosophy-based phenomenology contribute to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信