精神病早期阶段的行动选择:一种主动推理方法。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Franziska Knolle, Elisabeth Sterner, Michael Moutoussis, Rick A Adams, Juliet D Griffin, Joost Haarsma, Hilde Taverne, Ian M Goodyer, Paul C Fletcher, Graham K Murray
{"title":"精神病早期阶段的行动选择:一种主动推理方法。","authors":"Franziska Knolle,&nbsp;Elisabeth Sterner,&nbsp;Michael Moutoussis,&nbsp;Rick A Adams,&nbsp;Juliet D Griffin,&nbsp;Joost Haarsma,&nbsp;Hilde Taverne,&nbsp;Ian M Goodyer,&nbsp;Paul C Fletcher,&nbsp;Graham K Murray","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To interact successfully with their environment, humans need to build a model to make sense of noisy and ambiguous inputs. An inaccurate model, as suggested to be the case for people with psychosis, disturbs optimal action selection. Recent computational models, such as active inference, have emphasized the importance of action selection, treating it as a key part of the inferential process. Based on an active inference framework, we sought to evaluate previous knowledge and belief precision in an action-based task, given that alterations in these parameters have been linked to the development of psychotic symptoms. We further sought to determine whether task performance and modelling parameters would be suitable for classification of patients and controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three individuals with an at-risk mental state, 26 patients with first-episode psychosis and 31 controls completed a probabilistic task in which action choice (go/no-go) was dissociated from outcome valence (gain or loss). We evaluated group differences in performance and active inference model parameters and performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to assess group classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found reduced overall performance in patients with psychosis. Active inference modelling revealed that patients showed increased forgetting, reduced confidence in policy selection and less optimal general choice behaviour, with poorer action-state associations. Importantly, ROC analysis showed fair-to-good classification performance for all groups, when combining modelling parameters and performance measures.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The sample size is moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Active inference modelling of this task provides further explanation for dysfunctional mechanisms underlying decision-making in psychosis and may be relevant for future research on the development of biomarkers for early identification of psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"48 1","pages":"E78-E89"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/bb/48-1-E78.PMC9949875.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Action selection in early stages of psychosis: an active inference approach.\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Knolle,&nbsp;Elisabeth Sterner,&nbsp;Michael Moutoussis,&nbsp;Rick A Adams,&nbsp;Juliet D Griffin,&nbsp;Joost Haarsma,&nbsp;Hilde Taverne,&nbsp;Ian M Goodyer,&nbsp;Paul C Fletcher,&nbsp;Graham K Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/jpn.220141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To interact successfully with their environment, humans need to build a model to make sense of noisy and ambiguous inputs. An inaccurate model, as suggested to be the case for people with psychosis, disturbs optimal action selection. Recent computational models, such as active inference, have emphasized the importance of action selection, treating it as a key part of the inferential process. Based on an active inference framework, we sought to evaluate previous knowledge and belief precision in an action-based task, given that alterations in these parameters have been linked to the development of psychotic symptoms. We further sought to determine whether task performance and modelling parameters would be suitable for classification of patients and controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three individuals with an at-risk mental state, 26 patients with first-episode psychosis and 31 controls completed a probabilistic task in which action choice (go/no-go) was dissociated from outcome valence (gain or loss). We evaluated group differences in performance and active inference model parameters and performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to assess group classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found reduced overall performance in patients with psychosis. Active inference modelling revealed that patients showed increased forgetting, reduced confidence in policy selection and less optimal general choice behaviour, with poorer action-state associations. Importantly, ROC analysis showed fair-to-good classification performance for all groups, when combining modelling parameters and performance measures.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The sample size is moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Active inference modelling of this task provides further explanation for dysfunctional mechanisms underlying decision-making in psychosis and may be relevant for future research on the development of biomarkers for early identification of psychosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"E78-E89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/bb/48-1-E78.PMC9949875.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220141\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:为了成功地与环境互动,人类需要建立一个模型来理解嘈杂和模糊的输入。一个不准确的模型,就像精神病患者的情况一样,扰乱了最佳行动选择。最近的计算模型,如主动推理,强调了行动选择的重要性,将其视为推理过程的关键部分。基于一个主动推理框架,我们试图评估先前的知识和信念的准确性在一个基于行动的任务中,考虑到这些参数的改变与精神病症状的发展有关。我们进一步试图确定任务表现和建模参数是否适用于患者和对照组的分类。方法:23名精神状态有危险的个体、26名首发精神病患者和31名对照者完成了一项概率任务,在该任务中,行动选择(走/不走)与结果效价(得或失)分离。我们评估了各组在性能和主动推理模型参数方面的差异,并进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来评估组分类。结果:我们发现精神病患者的整体表现下降。主动推理模型显示,患者表现出遗忘增加,对政策选择的信心降低,一般选择行为不太理想,行为状态关联较差。重要的是,当结合建模参数和性能测量时,ROC分析显示所有组的分类性能都很好。局限性:样本量适中。结论:该任务的主动推理建模为精神病决策机制的功能障碍提供了进一步的解释,并可能与未来开发用于早期识别精神病的生物标志物的研究相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Action selection in early stages of psychosis: an active inference approach.

Action selection in early stages of psychosis: an active inference approach.

Action selection in early stages of psychosis: an active inference approach.

Action selection in early stages of psychosis: an active inference approach.

Background: To interact successfully with their environment, humans need to build a model to make sense of noisy and ambiguous inputs. An inaccurate model, as suggested to be the case for people with psychosis, disturbs optimal action selection. Recent computational models, such as active inference, have emphasized the importance of action selection, treating it as a key part of the inferential process. Based on an active inference framework, we sought to evaluate previous knowledge and belief precision in an action-based task, given that alterations in these parameters have been linked to the development of psychotic symptoms. We further sought to determine whether task performance and modelling parameters would be suitable for classification of patients and controls.

Methods: Twenty-three individuals with an at-risk mental state, 26 patients with first-episode psychosis and 31 controls completed a probabilistic task in which action choice (go/no-go) was dissociated from outcome valence (gain or loss). We evaluated group differences in performance and active inference model parameters and performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to assess group classification.

Results: We found reduced overall performance in patients with psychosis. Active inference modelling revealed that patients showed increased forgetting, reduced confidence in policy selection and less optimal general choice behaviour, with poorer action-state associations. Importantly, ROC analysis showed fair-to-good classification performance for all groups, when combining modelling parameters and performance measures.

Limitations: The sample size is moderate.

Conclusion: Active inference modelling of this task provides further explanation for dysfunctional mechanisms underlying decision-making in psychosis and may be relevant for future research on the development of biomarkers for early identification of psychosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience publishes papers at the intersection of psychiatry and neuroscience that advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. This includes studies on patients with psychiatric disorders, healthy humans, and experimental animals as well as studies in vitro. Original research articles, including clinical trials with a mechanistic component, and review papers will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信