个体化顺势疗法治疗颈椎病的疗效:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Maneela Tomar, Nitai Chand Bhowmik, Subhas Singh, Satarupa Sadhukhan, James Michael, Maneet Parewa, Shruti Rai, Bharti Gupta, Himani Vashisht, Pankhuri Misra, Munmun Koley, Subhranil Saha
{"title":"个体化顺势疗法治疗颈椎病的疗效:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Maneela Tomar,&nbsp;Nitai Chand Bhowmik,&nbsp;Subhas Singh,&nbsp;Satarupa Sadhukhan,&nbsp;James Michael,&nbsp;Maneet Parewa,&nbsp;Shruti Rai,&nbsp;Bharti Gupta,&nbsp;Himani Vashisht,&nbsp;Pankhuri Misra,&nbsp;Munmun Koley,&nbsp;Subhranil Saha","doi":"10.1159/000527523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a degenerative condition of the cervical spine, with approximately 80-90% of people suffering from disc degeneration by the age of 50 years. This trial attempts at evaluating the efficacy of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) against placebos in the treatment of CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the Organon of Medicine outpatient department of the National Institute of Homoeopathy, India. Patients were randomized to receive either IHMs (n = 70) or identical-looking placebos (n = 70) in the mutual context of concomitant conservative and standard physiotherapeutic care. Primary outcome measures were 0-10 Numeric Rating Scales (NRSs) for pain, stiffness, numbness, tingling, weakness, and vertigo, and the secondary outcome was the Neck Disability Index (NDI), measured at baseline and every month until 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed to detect group differences and effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, improvements were clinically significant and higher in the IHM group than the placebo group, but group differences were statistically nonsignificant with small effect sizes (all p > 0.05, two-way repeated measure analysis of variance). After 2 months of time points, improvements observed in the IHM group were significantly higher than placebo on a few occasions (e.g., pain NRS: p < 0.001; stiffness NRS: p = 0.024; weakness NRS: p = 0.003). Sulfur (n = 21; 15%) was the most frequently prescribed medication. No harm, unintended effects, or any serious adverse events were reported from either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An encouraging but nonsignificant direction of effect was elicited favoring IHMs against placebos in the treatment of CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10541,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Medicine Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maneela Tomar,&nbsp;Nitai Chand Bhowmik,&nbsp;Subhas Singh,&nbsp;Satarupa Sadhukhan,&nbsp;James Michael,&nbsp;Maneet Parewa,&nbsp;Shruti Rai,&nbsp;Bharti Gupta,&nbsp;Himani Vashisht,&nbsp;Pankhuri Misra,&nbsp;Munmun Koley,&nbsp;Subhranil Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000527523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a degenerative condition of the cervical spine, with approximately 80-90% of people suffering from disc degeneration by the age of 50 years. This trial attempts at evaluating the efficacy of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) against placebos in the treatment of CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the Organon of Medicine outpatient department of the National Institute of Homoeopathy, India. Patients were randomized to receive either IHMs (n = 70) or identical-looking placebos (n = 70) in the mutual context of concomitant conservative and standard physiotherapeutic care. Primary outcome measures were 0-10 Numeric Rating Scales (NRSs) for pain, stiffness, numbness, tingling, weakness, and vertigo, and the secondary outcome was the Neck Disability Index (NDI), measured at baseline and every month until 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed to detect group differences and effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, improvements were clinically significant and higher in the IHM group than the placebo group, but group differences were statistically nonsignificant with small effect sizes (all p > 0.05, two-way repeated measure analysis of variance). After 2 months of time points, improvements observed in the IHM group were significantly higher than placebo on a few occasions (e.g., pain NRS: p < 0.001; stiffness NRS: p = 0.024; weakness NRS: p = 0.003). Sulfur (n = 21; 15%) was the most frequently prescribed medication. No harm, unintended effects, or any serious adverse events were reported from either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An encouraging but nonsignificant direction of effect was elicited favoring IHMs against placebos in the treatment of CS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"26-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527523\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈椎病(CS)是一种颈椎退行性疾病,大约80-90%的人在50岁时患有椎间盘退变。本试验旨在评估个体化顺势疗法药物(IHMs)与安慰剂治疗CS的疗效。方法:在印度国家顺势疗法研究所奥加纳医学门诊部进行了一项为期3个月的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。患者随机接受ihm (n = 70)或相同外观的安慰剂(n = 70),同时接受保守和标准物理治疗护理。主要结果测量是0-10数值评定量表(NRSs)对疼痛、僵硬、麻木、刺痛、虚弱和眩晕的评价,次要结果是颈部残疾指数(NDI),在基线和每个月测量一次,直到3个月。对意向治疗样本进行分析,以检测组间差异和效应量。结果:总体而言,IHM组的改善具有临床意义,且高于安慰剂组,但组间差异无统计学意义,效应量较小(均p > 0.05,双向重复测量方差分析)。2个月后,在少数情况下,IHM组的改善明显高于安慰剂组(例如,疼痛NRS: p < 0.001;刚度NRS: p = 0.024;NRS: p = 0.003)。硫(n = 21;15%)是最常用的处方药。两组均未报告任何伤害、意外效应或任何严重不良事件。结论:在CS治疗中,ihm优于安慰剂的效果方向令人鼓舞,但不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a degenerative condition of the cervical spine, with approximately 80-90% of people suffering from disc degeneration by the age of 50 years. This trial attempts at evaluating the efficacy of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) against placebos in the treatment of CS.

Methods: A 3-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the Organon of Medicine outpatient department of the National Institute of Homoeopathy, India. Patients were randomized to receive either IHMs (n = 70) or identical-looking placebos (n = 70) in the mutual context of concomitant conservative and standard physiotherapeutic care. Primary outcome measures were 0-10 Numeric Rating Scales (NRSs) for pain, stiffness, numbness, tingling, weakness, and vertigo, and the secondary outcome was the Neck Disability Index (NDI), measured at baseline and every month until 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed to detect group differences and effect sizes.

Results: Overall, improvements were clinically significant and higher in the IHM group than the placebo group, but group differences were statistically nonsignificant with small effect sizes (all p > 0.05, two-way repeated measure analysis of variance). After 2 months of time points, improvements observed in the IHM group were significantly higher than placebo on a few occasions (e.g., pain NRS: p < 0.001; stiffness NRS: p = 0.024; weakness NRS: p = 0.003). Sulfur (n = 21; 15%) was the most frequently prescribed medication. No harm, unintended effects, or any serious adverse events were reported from either group.

Conclusions: An encouraging but nonsignificant direction of effect was elicited favoring IHMs against placebos in the treatment of CS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary Medicine Research
Complementary Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope ''Complementary Medicine Research'' is an international journal that aims to bridge the gap between conventional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) on a sound scientific basis, promoting their mutual integration. Accordingly, experts of both conventional medicine and CAM medicine cooperate on the journal‘s editorial board, which accepts papers only after a rigorous peer-review process in order to maintain a high standard of scientific quality. Spectrum of ''Complementary Medicine Research'': - Review and Original Articles, Case Reports and Essays regarding complementary practice and methods - Journal Club: Analysis and discussion of internationally published articles in complementary medicine - Editorials of leading experts in complementary medicine - Questions of complementary patient-centered care - Education in complementary medicine - Reports on important meetings and conferences - Society Bulletins of Schweizerische Medizinische Gesellschaft für Phytotherapie (SMGP) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Naturheilkunde Bibliographic Details Complementary Medicine Research Journal Abbreviation: Complement Med Res ISSN: 2504-2092 (Print) e-ISSN: 2504-2106 (Online) DOI: 10.1159/issn.2504-2092 www.karger.com/CMR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信