监督类,非监督混合比例:检测李克特类型问卷中的机器人。

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Educational and Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-30 DOI:10.1177/00131644221104220
Michael John Ilagan, Carl F Falk
{"title":"监督类,非监督混合比例:检测李克特类型问卷中的机器人。","authors":"Michael John Ilagan, Carl F Falk","doi":"10.1177/00131644221104220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Administering Likert-type questionnaires to online samples risks contamination of the data by malicious computer-generated random responses, also known as bots. Although nonresponsivity indices (NRIs) such as person-total correlations or Mahalanobis distance have shown great promise to detect bots, universal cutoff values are elusive. An initial calibration sample constructed via stratified sampling of bots and humans-real or simulated under a measurement model-has been used to empirically choose cutoffs with a high nominal specificity. However, a high-specificity cutoff is less accurate when the target sample has a high contamination rate. In the present article, we propose the supervised classes, unsupervised mixing proportions (SCUMP) algorithm that chooses a cutoff to maximize accuracy. SCUMP uses a Gaussian mixture model to estimate, unsupervised, the contamination rate in the sample of interest. A simulation study found that, in the absence of model misspecification on the bots, our cutoffs maintained accuracy across varying contamination rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":"83 2","pages":"217-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supervised Classes, Unsupervised Mixing Proportions: Detection of Bots in a Likert-Type Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Michael John Ilagan, Carl F Falk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00131644221104220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Administering Likert-type questionnaires to online samples risks contamination of the data by malicious computer-generated random responses, also known as bots. Although nonresponsivity indices (NRIs) such as person-total correlations or Mahalanobis distance have shown great promise to detect bots, universal cutoff values are elusive. An initial calibration sample constructed via stratified sampling of bots and humans-real or simulated under a measurement model-has been used to empirically choose cutoffs with a high nominal specificity. However, a high-specificity cutoff is less accurate when the target sample has a high contamination rate. In the present article, we propose the supervised classes, unsupervised mixing proportions (SCUMP) algorithm that chooses a cutoff to maximize accuracy. SCUMP uses a Gaussian mixture model to estimate, unsupervised, the contamination rate in the sample of interest. A simulation study found that, in the absence of model misspecification on the bots, our cutoffs maintained accuracy across varying contamination rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational and Psychological Measurement\",\"volume\":\"83 2\",\"pages\":\"217-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational and Psychological Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644221104220\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644221104220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

向在线样本发放李克特(Likert)类型的调查问卷有可能会被计算机随机生成的恶意回答(也称为机器人)污染数据。虽然人-总相关性或马哈拉诺比斯距离等非反应性指数(NRI)在检测机器人方面显示出了巨大的潜力,但通用的截止值却难以捉摸。通过在测量模型下对机器人和人类--真实的或模拟的--进行分层抽样而构建的初始校准样本,已被用于根据经验选择具有高名义特异性的临界值。然而,当目标样本的污染率较高时,高特异性截止值的准确性就会降低。在本文中,我们提出了监督类、无监督混合比例(SCUMP)算法,该算法可选择最大化准确性的截止值。SCUMP 采用高斯混合物模型,在无监督的情况下估计相关样本的污染率。一项模拟研究发现,在没有对机器人模型进行错误规范的情况下,我们的截断值在不同的污染率下都能保持准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supervised Classes, Unsupervised Mixing Proportions: Detection of Bots in a Likert-Type Questionnaire.

Administering Likert-type questionnaires to online samples risks contamination of the data by malicious computer-generated random responses, also known as bots. Although nonresponsivity indices (NRIs) such as person-total correlations or Mahalanobis distance have shown great promise to detect bots, universal cutoff values are elusive. An initial calibration sample constructed via stratified sampling of bots and humans-real or simulated under a measurement model-has been used to empirically choose cutoffs with a high nominal specificity. However, a high-specificity cutoff is less accurate when the target sample has a high contamination rate. In the present article, we propose the supervised classes, unsupervised mixing proportions (SCUMP) algorithm that chooses a cutoff to maximize accuracy. SCUMP uses a Gaussian mixture model to estimate, unsupervised, the contamination rate in the sample of interest. A simulation study found that, in the absence of model misspecification on the bots, our cutoffs maintained accuracy across varying contamination rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Educational and Psychological Measurement 医学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Educational and Psychological Measurement (EPM) publishes referred scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in the study of measurement theory, problems, and issues. Theoretical articles address new developments and techniques, and applied articles deal with innovation applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信