以同情为重点的疼痛管理疗法:通过 "三系统方法 "了解为什么努力和自我批评是持续疼痛患者调节活动和改善自我护理的主要心理障碍。

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-16 DOI:10.1177/20494637221133630
Zoey Malpus, Zaynab Nazar, Chloe Smith, Lesley Armitage
{"title":"以同情为重点的疼痛管理疗法:通过 \"三系统方法 \"了解为什么努力和自我批评是持续疼痛患者调节活动和改善自我护理的主要心理障碍。","authors":"Zoey Malpus, Zaynab Nazar, Chloe Smith, Lesley Armitage","doi":"10.1177/20494637221133630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper describes the development of an eight-week Compassion Focused Therapy for Pain Management (CFT-PM) group. This group was specifically designed for 'strivers' a sub-group of people with persistent pain who tend to engage in over-activity and resist making reasonable adjustments to their activity levels to accommodate their persistent pain. 'Strivers' tend to cope by ignoring their pain and pushing on through, in the shorter term leading to 'boom and bust' activity-related exacerbations of their pain. They also risk the development of additional persistent fatigue and burnout in the longer term.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>117 people completed the CFT-PM group; The group was delivered in person (<i>n</i> = 84) but in online format from July 2020 (<i>n</i> = 33). 162 people started the CFT-PM group but 45 dropped-out (27.43%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant effect for time across all measures: significant improvement was found for depression, self-compassion, pain-related disability, pain-related anxiety and pain self-efficacy. Pain numeric rating scores were approaching significance. There was a significant main effect of diagnosis; post-hoc t-test analysis found significant improvement for all diagnoses on all measures with the exception of spinal. There was also a significant interaction between time and format: post-hoc t-test analysis found greater improvement for virtual format on self-compassion and pain-related anxiety.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings suggests that CFT-PM may be a clinically effective group intervention with virtual format showing superior improvement. This approach might be less suitable for certain diagnoses; the spinal group may benefit more from traditional CBT-based PMPs. Limitations include the lack of random selection or allocation to treatment group. Future studies should adopt an experimental design to be able to draw firm conclusions regarding causation and efficacy. Despite these limitations, present findings suggest that CFT-PM may be an effective group intervention worthy of further investigation and clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compassion focused therapy for pain management: '3 systems approach' to understanding why striving and self-criticism are key psychological barriers to regulating activity and improving self-care for people living with persistent pain.\",\"authors\":\"Zoey Malpus, Zaynab Nazar, Chloe Smith, Lesley Armitage\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20494637221133630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper describes the development of an eight-week Compassion Focused Therapy for Pain Management (CFT-PM) group. This group was specifically designed for 'strivers' a sub-group of people with persistent pain who tend to engage in over-activity and resist making reasonable adjustments to their activity levels to accommodate their persistent pain. 'Strivers' tend to cope by ignoring their pain and pushing on through, in the shorter term leading to 'boom and bust' activity-related exacerbations of their pain. They also risk the development of additional persistent fatigue and burnout in the longer term.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>117 people completed the CFT-PM group; The group was delivered in person (<i>n</i> = 84) but in online format from July 2020 (<i>n</i> = 33). 162 people started the CFT-PM group but 45 dropped-out (27.43%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant effect for time across all measures: significant improvement was found for depression, self-compassion, pain-related disability, pain-related anxiety and pain self-efficacy. Pain numeric rating scores were approaching significance. There was a significant main effect of diagnosis; post-hoc t-test analysis found significant improvement for all diagnoses on all measures with the exception of spinal. There was also a significant interaction between time and format: post-hoc t-test analysis found greater improvement for virtual format on self-compassion and pain-related anxiety.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings suggests that CFT-PM may be a clinically effective group intervention with virtual format showing superior improvement. This approach might be less suitable for certain diagnoses; the spinal group may benefit more from traditional CBT-based PMPs. Limitations include the lack of random selection or allocation to treatment group. Future studies should adopt an experimental design to be able to draw firm conclusions regarding causation and efficacy. Despite these limitations, present findings suggest that CFT-PM may be an effective group intervention worthy of further investigation and clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940251/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637221133630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637221133630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本文介绍了为期八周的 "疼痛管理慈悲集中疗法(CFT-PM)"小组的发展情况。该小组是专门为 "奋斗者 "设计的,"奋斗者 "是持续性疼痛患者中的一个小群体,他们倾向于过度活动,并抵制对其活动水平进行合理调整,以适应其持续性疼痛。努力者 "倾向于通过忽视疼痛并坚持下去来应对,这在短期内会导致 "繁荣与萧条 "活动相关的疼痛加剧。从长远来看,他们还面临着产生更多持续性疲劳和职业倦怠的风险:117人完成了CFT-PM小组;该小组由专人负责(n = 84),但从2020年7月起采用在线形式(n = 33)。162人开始参加CFT-PM小组,但有45人退出(27.43%):结果:在所有测量指标中,时间都有明显影响:抑郁、自我同情、疼痛相关残疾、疼痛相关焦虑和疼痛自我效能都有明显改善。疼痛数字评分接近显著水平。诊断有明显的主效应;事后 t 检验分析发现,除脊柱外,所有诊断在所有指标上都有明显改善。时间与形式之间也存在明显的交互作用:事后 t 检验分析发现,虚拟形式对自我同情和疼痛相关焦虑的改善更大:讨论:研究结果表明,CFT-PM 可能是一种临床有效的团体干预方法,其中虚拟形式的干预效果更好。这种方法可能不太适合某些诊断;脊柱组可能更受益于传统的基于 CBT 的 PMPs。不足之处包括缺乏随机选择或治疗组分配。未来的研究应采用实验设计,以便就因果关系和疗效得出确切结论。尽管存在这些局限性,但目前的研究结果表明,CFT-PM 可能是一种有效的团体干预方法,值得进一步研究和临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compassion focused therapy for pain management: '3 systems approach' to understanding why striving and self-criticism are key psychological barriers to regulating activity and improving self-care for people living with persistent pain.

Background: This paper describes the development of an eight-week Compassion Focused Therapy for Pain Management (CFT-PM) group. This group was specifically designed for 'strivers' a sub-group of people with persistent pain who tend to engage in over-activity and resist making reasonable adjustments to their activity levels to accommodate their persistent pain. 'Strivers' tend to cope by ignoring their pain and pushing on through, in the shorter term leading to 'boom and bust' activity-related exacerbations of their pain. They also risk the development of additional persistent fatigue and burnout in the longer term.

Method: 117 people completed the CFT-PM group; The group was delivered in person (n = 84) but in online format from July 2020 (n = 33). 162 people started the CFT-PM group but 45 dropped-out (27.43%).

Results: There was a significant effect for time across all measures: significant improvement was found for depression, self-compassion, pain-related disability, pain-related anxiety and pain self-efficacy. Pain numeric rating scores were approaching significance. There was a significant main effect of diagnosis; post-hoc t-test analysis found significant improvement for all diagnoses on all measures with the exception of spinal. There was also a significant interaction between time and format: post-hoc t-test analysis found greater improvement for virtual format on self-compassion and pain-related anxiety.

Discussion: Findings suggests that CFT-PM may be a clinically effective group intervention with virtual format showing superior improvement. This approach might be less suitable for certain diagnoses; the spinal group may benefit more from traditional CBT-based PMPs. Limitations include the lack of random selection or allocation to treatment group. Future studies should adopt an experimental design to be able to draw firm conclusions regarding causation and efficacy. Despite these limitations, present findings suggest that CFT-PM may be an effective group intervention worthy of further investigation and clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信