遗传毒性职业和环境人类化学致癌物诱导的表观遗传改变:系统文献综述的更新

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Samantha Goodman , Grace Chappell , Kathryn Z. Guyton , Igor P. Pogribny , Ivan Rusyn
{"title":"遗传毒性职业和环境人类化学致癌物诱导的表观遗传改变:系统文献综述的更新","authors":"Samantha Goodman ,&nbsp;Grace Chappell ,&nbsp;Kathryn Z. Guyton ,&nbsp;Igor P. Pogribny ,&nbsp;Ivan Rusyn","doi":"10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Epigenetic alterations, such as changes in DNA </span>methylation, histones/chromatin structure, </span>nucleosome positioning<span>, and expression of non-coding RNAs, are recognized among key characteristics of carcinogens; they may occur independently or concomitantly with genotoxic effects. While data on genotoxicity are collected through standardized guideline tests, data collected on epigenetic effects is far less uniform. In 2016, we conducted a systematic review of published studies of genotoxic carcinogens that reported epigenetic endpoints to better understand the evidence for epigenetic alterations of human carcinogens, and the potential association with genotoxic endpoints. Since then, the number of studies of epigenetic effects of chemicals has nearly doubled. This review stands as an update on epigenetic alterations induced by occupational and environmental human carcinogens that were previously and recently classified as Group 1 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. We found that the evidence of epigenetic effects remains uneven across agents. Studies of DNA methylation are most abundant, while reports concerning effects on non-coding RNA have increased over the past 5 years. By contrast, mechanistic toxicology studies of histone modifications and chromatin state alterations remain few. We found that most publications of epigenetic effects of carcinogens were studies in exposed humans or human cells. Studies in rodents represent the second most common species used for epigenetic studies in toxicology, </span></span><em>in vivo</em> exposures being the most predominant. Future studies should incorporate dose- and time-dependent study designs and also investigate the persistence of effects following cessation of exposure, considering the dynamic nature of most epigenetic alterations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49789,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research","volume":"789 ","pages":"Article 108408"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: An update of a systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Goodman ,&nbsp;Grace Chappell ,&nbsp;Kathryn Z. Guyton ,&nbsp;Igor P. Pogribny ,&nbsp;Ivan Rusyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Epigenetic alterations, such as changes in DNA </span>methylation, histones/chromatin structure, </span>nucleosome positioning<span>, and expression of non-coding RNAs, are recognized among key characteristics of carcinogens; they may occur independently or concomitantly with genotoxic effects. While data on genotoxicity are collected through standardized guideline tests, data collected on epigenetic effects is far less uniform. In 2016, we conducted a systematic review of published studies of genotoxic carcinogens that reported epigenetic endpoints to better understand the evidence for epigenetic alterations of human carcinogens, and the potential association with genotoxic endpoints. Since then, the number of studies of epigenetic effects of chemicals has nearly doubled. This review stands as an update on epigenetic alterations induced by occupational and environmental human carcinogens that were previously and recently classified as Group 1 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. We found that the evidence of epigenetic effects remains uneven across agents. Studies of DNA methylation are most abundant, while reports concerning effects on non-coding RNA have increased over the past 5 years. By contrast, mechanistic toxicology studies of histone modifications and chromatin state alterations remain few. We found that most publications of epigenetic effects of carcinogens were studies in exposed humans or human cells. Studies in rodents represent the second most common species used for epigenetic studies in toxicology, </span></span><em>in vivo</em> exposures being the most predominant. Future studies should incorporate dose- and time-dependent study designs and also investigate the persistence of effects following cessation of exposure, considering the dynamic nature of most epigenetic alterations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research\",\"volume\":\"789 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383574221000454\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383574221000454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

表观遗传改变,如DNA甲基化、组蛋白/染色质结构、核小体定位和非编码rna表达的变化,被认为是致癌物质的关键特征;它们可能独立发生,也可能与基因毒性作用同时发生。虽然关于遗传毒性的数据是通过标准化的指导性试验收集的,但关于表观遗传效应的数据却远没有那么统一。2016年,我们对已发表的遗传毒性致癌物表观遗传终点的研究进行了系统回顾,以更好地了解人类致癌物表观遗传改变的证据,以及与遗传毒性终点的潜在关联。从那时起,关于化学物质表观遗传效应的研究数量几乎翻了一番。这篇综述是对职业和环境致癌物引起的表观遗传改变的最新研究,这些致癌物以前和最近被国际癌症研究机构列为第一类。我们发现,表观遗传效应的证据在不同的药物之间仍然不均匀。DNA甲基化的研究最为丰富,而关于非编码RNA影响的报道在过去5年中有所增加。相比之下,组蛋白修饰和染色质状态改变的机械毒理学研究仍然很少。我们发现,大多数发表的致癌物质表观遗传效应的研究都是在暴露的人类或人类细胞中进行的。啮齿类动物的研究是毒理学表观遗传学研究中第二常用的物种,体内暴露是最主要的。考虑到大多数表观遗传改变的动态性质,未来的研究应纳入剂量和时间依赖的研究设计,并调查停止接触后影响的持久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: An update of a systematic literature review

Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: An update of a systematic literature review

Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: An update of a systematic literature review

Epigenetic alterations, such as changes in DNA methylation, histones/chromatin structure, nucleosome positioning, and expression of non-coding RNAs, are recognized among key characteristics of carcinogens; they may occur independently or concomitantly with genotoxic effects. While data on genotoxicity are collected through standardized guideline tests, data collected on epigenetic effects is far less uniform. In 2016, we conducted a systematic review of published studies of genotoxic carcinogens that reported epigenetic endpoints to better understand the evidence for epigenetic alterations of human carcinogens, and the potential association with genotoxic endpoints. Since then, the number of studies of epigenetic effects of chemicals has nearly doubled. This review stands as an update on epigenetic alterations induced by occupational and environmental human carcinogens that were previously and recently classified as Group 1 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. We found that the evidence of epigenetic effects remains uneven across agents. Studies of DNA methylation are most abundant, while reports concerning effects on non-coding RNA have increased over the past 5 years. By contrast, mechanistic toxicology studies of histone modifications and chromatin state alterations remain few. We found that most publications of epigenetic effects of carcinogens were studies in exposed humans or human cells. Studies in rodents represent the second most common species used for epigenetic studies in toxicology, in vivo exposures being the most predominant. Future studies should incorporate dose- and time-dependent study designs and also investigate the persistence of effects following cessation of exposure, considering the dynamic nature of most epigenetic alterations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.90%
发文量
22
审稿时长
15.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The subject areas of Reviews in Mutation Research encompass the entire spectrum of the science of mutation research and its applications, with particular emphasis on the relationship between mutation and disease. Thus this section will cover advances in human genome research (including evolving technologies for mutation detection and functional genomics) with applications in clinical genetics, gene therapy and health risk assessment for environmental agents of concern.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信