远程医疗在初次门诊专科会诊中的应用:一项针对普通儿科医生和儿科专科医生的全国性调查

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kristin N. Ray , James C. Bohnhoff , Kelsey Schweiberger , Gina M. Sequeira , Janel Hanmer , Jeremy M. Kahn
{"title":"远程医疗在初次门诊专科会诊中的应用:一项针对普通儿科医生和儿科专科医生的全国性调查","authors":"Kristin N. Ray ,&nbsp;James C. Bohnhoff ,&nbsp;Kelsey Schweiberger ,&nbsp;Gina M. Sequeira ,&nbsp;Janel Hanmer ,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Kahn","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Evidence-based strategies are needed to support appropriate use of telemedicine<span> for initial outpatient subspecialty consultative visits. To inform such strategies we performed a survey of general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists about use of telemedicine for patients newly referred for pediatric subspecialty care.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed and fielded an e-mail and postal survey of a national sample of 840 general pediatricians and 840 pediatric subspecialists in May and June 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 266 completed surveys (17% response rate), 204 (76%) thought telemedicine should be offered for some and 29 (11%) thought telemedicine should be offered for all initial subspecialist visits. Most respondents who indicated telemedicine should be offered for some initial consultations believed this decision should be made by subspecialty attendings (176/204, 86%). Respondents prioritized several data elements to inform this decision, including clinical information and family-based contextual information (e.g., barriers to in-person care, interest in telemedicine, potential communication barriers). Factors perceived to reduce appropriateness of telemedicine for subspecialty consultation included need for interpreter services and prior history of frequent no-shows. Responses from generalists and subspecialists rarely differed significantly.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Survey results suggest potential opportunities to support the appropriate use of telemedicine for initial outpatient pediatric subspecialty visits through structured transfer of specific clinical and contextual information at the time of referral and through strategies to mitigate perceived communication or engagement barriers.</p></div><div><h3>Implication</h3><p>Pediatric physician beliefs about telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialty consultative visits may inform future interventions to support appropriate telemedicine use.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Survey of a national sample of clinicians.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 100600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialist consultative visit: A national survey of general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists\",\"authors\":\"Kristin N. Ray ,&nbsp;James C. Bohnhoff ,&nbsp;Kelsey Schweiberger ,&nbsp;Gina M. Sequeira ,&nbsp;Janel Hanmer ,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Kahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Evidence-based strategies are needed to support appropriate use of telemedicine<span> for initial outpatient subspecialty consultative visits. To inform such strategies we performed a survey of general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists about use of telemedicine for patients newly referred for pediatric subspecialty care.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed and fielded an e-mail and postal survey of a national sample of 840 general pediatricians and 840 pediatric subspecialists in May and June 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 266 completed surveys (17% response rate), 204 (76%) thought telemedicine should be offered for some and 29 (11%) thought telemedicine should be offered for all initial subspecialist visits. Most respondents who indicated telemedicine should be offered for some initial consultations believed this decision should be made by subspecialty attendings (176/204, 86%). Respondents prioritized several data elements to inform this decision, including clinical information and family-based contextual information (e.g., barriers to in-person care, interest in telemedicine, potential communication barriers). Factors perceived to reduce appropriateness of telemedicine for subspecialty consultation included need for interpreter services and prior history of frequent no-shows. Responses from generalists and subspecialists rarely differed significantly.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Survey results suggest potential opportunities to support the appropriate use of telemedicine for initial outpatient pediatric subspecialty visits through structured transfer of specific clinical and contextual information at the time of referral and through strategies to mitigate perceived communication or engagement barriers.</p></div><div><h3>Implication</h3><p>Pediatric physician beliefs about telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialty consultative visits may inform future interventions to support appropriate telemedicine use.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Survey of a national sample of clinicians.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642100083X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642100083X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:需要基于证据的策略来支持在初次门诊亚专科会诊中适当使用远程医疗。为了告知这些策略,我们对普通儿科医生和儿科亚专科医生进行了一项关于使用远程医疗为新转介的儿童亚专科护理患者的调查。方法:我们于2020年5月和6月对840名普通儿科医生和840名儿科专科医生的全国样本进行了电子邮件和邮政调查。结果266份已完成的调查(回复率17%)中,204份(76%)认为应提供部分远程医疗服务,29份(11%)认为应提供所有亚专科初诊的远程医疗服务。大多数表示应该为一些初步咨询提供远程医疗的受访者认为,这一决定应该由亚专科主治医师做出(176/ 204,86%)。应答者优先考虑了若干数据要素,为这一决定提供依据,包括临床信息和基于家庭的背景信息(例如,面对面护理的障碍、对远程医疗的兴趣、潜在的沟通障碍)。降低远程医疗对亚专科会诊的适宜性的因素包括需要口译服务和以前经常缺席的历史。通才和分科专家的反应很少有显著差异。调查结果表明,通过在转诊时结构化地传递特定的临床和背景信息,以及通过减轻感知到的沟通或参与障碍的策略,可能有机会支持在儿科亚专科门诊首次就诊时适当使用远程医疗。意义儿科医生对远程医疗在初次门诊亚专科会诊中的看法可能会为未来的干预措施提供信息,以支持适当的远程医疗使用。证据水平对全国临床医生样本的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialist consultative visit: A national survey of general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists

Use of telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialist consultative visit: A national survey of general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists

Use of telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialist consultative visit: A national survey of general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists

Background

Evidence-based strategies are needed to support appropriate use of telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialty consultative visits. To inform such strategies we performed a survey of general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists about use of telemedicine for patients newly referred for pediatric subspecialty care.

Methods

We developed and fielded an e-mail and postal survey of a national sample of 840 general pediatricians and 840 pediatric subspecialists in May and June 2020.

Results

Of 266 completed surveys (17% response rate), 204 (76%) thought telemedicine should be offered for some and 29 (11%) thought telemedicine should be offered for all initial subspecialist visits. Most respondents who indicated telemedicine should be offered for some initial consultations believed this decision should be made by subspecialty attendings (176/204, 86%). Respondents prioritized several data elements to inform this decision, including clinical information and family-based contextual information (e.g., barriers to in-person care, interest in telemedicine, potential communication barriers). Factors perceived to reduce appropriateness of telemedicine for subspecialty consultation included need for interpreter services and prior history of frequent no-shows. Responses from generalists and subspecialists rarely differed significantly.

Conclusions

Survey results suggest potential opportunities to support the appropriate use of telemedicine for initial outpatient pediatric subspecialty visits through structured transfer of specific clinical and contextual information at the time of referral and through strategies to mitigate perceived communication or engagement barriers.

Implication

Pediatric physician beliefs about telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialty consultative visits may inform future interventions to support appropriate telemedicine use.

Level of evidence

Survey of a national sample of clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信