“他们完全只谈论异性恋夫妇”:学校教育、性暴力和性少数群体青年。

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Margaret MacAulay, Michele Ybarra, Elizabeth Saewyc, Richard Sullivan, Lauren Jackson, Shannon Millar
{"title":"“他们完全只谈论异性恋夫妇”:学校教育、性暴力和性少数群体青年。","authors":"Margaret MacAulay,&nbsp;Michele Ybarra,&nbsp;Elizabeth Saewyc,&nbsp;Richard Sullivan,&nbsp;Lauren Jackson,&nbsp;Shannon Millar","doi":"10.1080/14681811.2021.1924142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scholarly conversations regarding sexual violence and sexuality education typically emphasise cisgender and heterosexual experiences, leaving sexual and gender minority young people's voices unheard. This happens despite adolescence being a crucial period for the onset of sexual violence, with sexual and gender minority youth reporting elevated levels of victimisation. Moreover, the preponderance of research focusing on victimisation suggests notable gaps in our understanding of sexual violence perpetration. This study examined contextual factors shaping sexual violence victimisation and perpetration among sexual and gender minority youth, with school playing a key role. Based on qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 50 young people aged 14-26 years who self-reported sexual violence perpetration in the Growing Up with Media survey, the analysis demonstrates how schooling's 'hidden curriculum' leaves sexual and gender minority youth ill-equipped to navigate the world of sexuality. Formal sexuality education remains heteronormative and gender-segregated, resulting in incomplete understandings of sexual violence. At the informal level, gendered double standards and peer norms reinforce the second-class sexual citizenship of sexual and gender minority youth. Our findings suggest that schools may be complicit in sexual violence victimisation and perpetration by sending limited and mixed messages regarding gender and sexuality. Research and policy implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47510,"journal":{"name":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14681811.2021.1924142","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'They Talked Completely about Straight Couples Only': Schooling, Sexual Violence and Sexual and Gender Minority Youth.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret MacAulay,&nbsp;Michele Ybarra,&nbsp;Elizabeth Saewyc,&nbsp;Richard Sullivan,&nbsp;Lauren Jackson,&nbsp;Shannon Millar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14681811.2021.1924142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Scholarly conversations regarding sexual violence and sexuality education typically emphasise cisgender and heterosexual experiences, leaving sexual and gender minority young people's voices unheard. This happens despite adolescence being a crucial period for the onset of sexual violence, with sexual and gender minority youth reporting elevated levels of victimisation. Moreover, the preponderance of research focusing on victimisation suggests notable gaps in our understanding of sexual violence perpetration. This study examined contextual factors shaping sexual violence victimisation and perpetration among sexual and gender minority youth, with school playing a key role. Based on qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 50 young people aged 14-26 years who self-reported sexual violence perpetration in the Growing Up with Media survey, the analysis demonstrates how schooling's 'hidden curriculum' leaves sexual and gender minority youth ill-equipped to navigate the world of sexuality. Formal sexuality education remains heteronormative and gender-segregated, resulting in incomplete understandings of sexual violence. At the informal level, gendered double standards and peer norms reinforce the second-class sexual citizenship of sexual and gender minority youth. Our findings suggest that schools may be complicit in sexual violence victimisation and perpetration by sending limited and mixed messages regarding gender and sexuality. Research and policy implications are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14681811.2021.1924142\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1924142\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1924142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

关于性暴力和性教育的学术对话通常强调顺性和异性恋的经历,而忽视了性少数群体和性别少数群体年轻人的声音。尽管青春期是性暴力发生的关键时期,性和性别少数群体青年报告的受害程度有所上升,但仍发生了这种情况。此外,侧重于受害的研究的优势表明,我们对性暴力犯罪的理解存在显著差距。这项研究调查了影响性和性别少数群体青少年性暴力受害和犯罪的环境因素,其中学校起着关键作用。该分析基于对50名年龄在14-26岁之间的年轻人的半结构化访谈的定性数据,这些年轻人在“与媒体一起成长”调查中自我报告了性暴力行为。分析表明,学校的“隐藏课程”如何使性取向和性别少数群体的年轻人无法驾驭性世界。正规的性教育仍然是异性恋规范和性别隔离,导致对性暴力的理解不完整。在非正式层面上,性别双重标准和同伴规范强化了性少数和性别少数青年的二等性公民身份。我们的研究结果表明,学校可能通过发送关于性别和性的有限和混合的信息而成为性暴力受害者和犯罪者的同谋。讨论了研究和政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'They Talked Completely about Straight Couples Only': Schooling, Sexual Violence and Sexual and Gender Minority Youth.

Scholarly conversations regarding sexual violence and sexuality education typically emphasise cisgender and heterosexual experiences, leaving sexual and gender minority young people's voices unheard. This happens despite adolescence being a crucial period for the onset of sexual violence, with sexual and gender minority youth reporting elevated levels of victimisation. Moreover, the preponderance of research focusing on victimisation suggests notable gaps in our understanding of sexual violence perpetration. This study examined contextual factors shaping sexual violence victimisation and perpetration among sexual and gender minority youth, with school playing a key role. Based on qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 50 young people aged 14-26 years who self-reported sexual violence perpetration in the Growing Up with Media survey, the analysis demonstrates how schooling's 'hidden curriculum' leaves sexual and gender minority youth ill-equipped to navigate the world of sexuality. Formal sexuality education remains heteronormative and gender-segregated, resulting in incomplete understandings of sexual violence. At the informal level, gendered double standards and peer norms reinforce the second-class sexual citizenship of sexual and gender minority youth. Our findings suggest that schools may be complicit in sexual violence victimisation and perpetration by sending limited and mixed messages regarding gender and sexuality. Research and policy implications are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信