心衰患者干血斑中卡维地洛、依那普利特和培哚普利特的定量多重LC-MS/MS检测方法的验证及其与血浆检测方法的交叉验证

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Andre Joubert , Anton Joubert , Marthinus van der Merwe , Jennifer Norman , Sandra Castel , Paolo Denti , Karen Sliwa , Gary Maartens , Phumla Sinxadi , Lubbe Wiesner
{"title":"心衰患者干血斑中卡维地洛、依那普利特和培哚普利特的定量多重LC-MS/MS检测方法的验证及其与血浆检测方法的交叉验证","authors":"Andre Joubert ,&nbsp;Anton Joubert ,&nbsp;Marthinus van der Merwe ,&nbsp;Jennifer Norman ,&nbsp;Sandra Castel ,&nbsp;Paolo Denti ,&nbsp;Karen Sliwa ,&nbsp;Gary Maartens ,&nbsp;Phumla Sinxadi ,&nbsp;Lubbe Wiesner","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Adherence to medication is an important determinant of outcomes in chronic diseases like heart failure. Drug assays provide objective adherence biomarkers. Dried blood spots (DBS) are appealing samples for drug assays due to less demanding transportation and storage requirements.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To analytically validate a LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in DBS and evaluate the feasibility of using the method as an adherence determining assay. To validate the assay further clinically by establishing correlation and agreement between plasma and DBS samples from a pharmacokinetic pilot study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The method was validated over a concentration range of 1.00–200 ng/mL according to FDA guidelines. Adherence tracking ability of the assay was evaluated using a pharmacokinetic pilot study. Correlation and agreement were evaluated through Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Accuracy, precision, selectivity, and sensitivity were proven with complete and reproducible extraction recovery at all concentrations tested. Stability of the analytes in the matrix and throughout sample processing was proven. The full range of concentrations of the pharmacokinetic pilot study could be quantified for enalaprilat, but not for carvedilol and perindoprilat. The difference between the observed and calculated plasma concentrations was less than 20 % of their mean for &gt;67 % of samples for all analytes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The assay is suitable as a screening tool for carvedilol and perindoprilat, while suitable as an adherence determining assay for enalaprilat. Equivalence between observed and predicted plasma concentrations proves DBS and plasma concentrations can be used interchangeably.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":"27 ","pages":"Pages 7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/d1/main.PMC9772843.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a quantitative multiplex LC-MS/MS assay of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in dried blood spots from heart failure patients and its cross validation with a plasma assay\",\"authors\":\"Andre Joubert ,&nbsp;Anton Joubert ,&nbsp;Marthinus van der Merwe ,&nbsp;Jennifer Norman ,&nbsp;Sandra Castel ,&nbsp;Paolo Denti ,&nbsp;Karen Sliwa ,&nbsp;Gary Maartens ,&nbsp;Phumla Sinxadi ,&nbsp;Lubbe Wiesner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Adherence to medication is an important determinant of outcomes in chronic diseases like heart failure. Drug assays provide objective adherence biomarkers. Dried blood spots (DBS) are appealing samples for drug assays due to less demanding transportation and storage requirements.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To analytically validate a LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in DBS and evaluate the feasibility of using the method as an adherence determining assay. To validate the assay further clinically by establishing correlation and agreement between plasma and DBS samples from a pharmacokinetic pilot study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The method was validated over a concentration range of 1.00–200 ng/mL according to FDA guidelines. Adherence tracking ability of the assay was evaluated using a pharmacokinetic pilot study. Correlation and agreement were evaluated through Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Accuracy, precision, selectivity, and sensitivity were proven with complete and reproducible extraction recovery at all concentrations tested. Stability of the analytes in the matrix and throughout sample processing was proven. The full range of concentrations of the pharmacokinetic pilot study could be quantified for enalaprilat, but not for carvedilol and perindoprilat. The difference between the observed and calculated plasma concentrations was less than 20 % of their mean for &gt;67 % of samples for all analytes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The assay is suitable as a screening tool for carvedilol and perindoprilat, while suitable as an adherence determining assay for enalaprilat. Equivalence between observed and predicted plasma concentrations proves DBS and plasma concentrations can be used interchangeably.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 7-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/d1/main.PMC9772843.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X22000451\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X22000451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言坚持服药是心力衰竭等慢性疾病预后的重要决定因素。药物测定提供了客观的粘附性生物标志物。干血点(DBS)是药物分析的有吸引力的样品,因为运输和储存要求较低。目的分析验证LC-MS/MS法同时定量DBS中卡维地洛、依那普利和培哚普利的方法,并评估该方法作为粘附性测定方法的可行性。通过建立血浆和来自药代动力学试点研究的DBS样品之间的相关性和一致性,进一步在临床上验证该测定。方法根据美国食品药品监督管理局的指导方针,在1.00–200 ng/mL的浓度范围内对该方法进行验证。使用药代动力学初步研究评估了该测定的依从性跟踪能力。分别通过Deming回归和Bland-Altman分析评估相关性和一致性。结果在所有测试浓度下,准确度、精密度、选择性和灵敏度都得到了验证,提取回收率完全且可重复。分析物在基质和整个样品处理过程中的稳定性得到了证实。药代动力学初步研究的全部浓度范围可以量化依那普利,但不能量化卡维地洛和培哚普利。对于>;67%的样品用于所有分析物。结论该方法适用于卡维地洛和培哚普利的筛选,也适用于依那普利的粘附性测定。观察到的和预测的血浆浓度之间的等效性证明DBS和血浆浓度可以互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of a quantitative multiplex LC-MS/MS assay of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in dried blood spots from heart failure patients and its cross validation with a plasma assay

Validation of a quantitative multiplex LC-MS/MS assay of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in dried blood spots from heart failure patients and its cross validation with a plasma assay

Validation of a quantitative multiplex LC-MS/MS assay of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in dried blood spots from heart failure patients and its cross validation with a plasma assay

Validation of a quantitative multiplex LC-MS/MS assay of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in dried blood spots from heart failure patients and its cross validation with a plasma assay

Introduction

Adherence to medication is an important determinant of outcomes in chronic diseases like heart failure. Drug assays provide objective adherence biomarkers. Dried blood spots (DBS) are appealing samples for drug assays due to less demanding transportation and storage requirements.

Objectives

To analytically validate a LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in DBS and evaluate the feasibility of using the method as an adherence determining assay. To validate the assay further clinically by establishing correlation and agreement between plasma and DBS samples from a pharmacokinetic pilot study.

Methods

The method was validated over a concentration range of 1.00–200 ng/mL according to FDA guidelines. Adherence tracking ability of the assay was evaluated using a pharmacokinetic pilot study. Correlation and agreement were evaluated through Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively.

Results

Accuracy, precision, selectivity, and sensitivity were proven with complete and reproducible extraction recovery at all concentrations tested. Stability of the analytes in the matrix and throughout sample processing was proven. The full range of concentrations of the pharmacokinetic pilot study could be quantified for enalaprilat, but not for carvedilol and perindoprilat. The difference between the observed and calculated plasma concentrations was less than 20 % of their mean for >67 % of samples for all analytes.

Conclusions

The assay is suitable as a screening tool for carvedilol and perindoprilat, while suitable as an adherence determining assay for enalaprilat. Equivalence between observed and predicted plasma concentrations proves DBS and plasma concentrations can be used interchangeably.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信