“基于主体的人类行为建模”特刊

IF 1.6 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Soo Ling Lim;Peter J. Bentley
{"title":"“基于主体的人类行为建模”特刊","authors":"Soo Ling Lim;Peter J. Bentley","doi":"10.1162/artl_e_00394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If human societies are so complex, then how can we hope to understand them? Artificial Life gives us one answer. The field of Artificial Life comprises a diverse set of introspective studies that largely ask the same questions, albeit from many different perspectives: Why are we here? Who are we? Why do we behave as we do? Starting with the origins of life provides us with fascinating answers to some of these questions. However, some researchers choose to bring their studies closer to the present day. We are, after all, human. It has been a few billion years since our ancestors were self-replicating molecules. Thus more direct studies of ourselves and our human societies can reveal truths that may lead to practical knowledge. The articles in this special issue bring together scientists who choose to perform this kind of research. Expanded from submissions to our annual Agent-Based Modelling of Human Behaviour Workshop, the studies share similar methods, all using variations of agent-based modeling (ABM) to ask their own what-if questions. As guest editors, we believe such collections help bring together and enhance such research by sharing ideas. While ABM research—out of necessity—is often highly specialized toward the hypotheses and phenomena under study, the research methodology is shared by all. We formulate our hypothesis, develop our agent-based model of the relevant aspects of reality, and run experiments to gather evidence that may support or refute the hypothesis. An experimental model that supports the hypothesis may not prove that reality follows this approach or agrees with this result, but it indicates that there exists a specific set of conditions that, if found to be true elsewhere, may produce the same result. Modeling tells us about trends, about possible likelihoods. Our ABMs show us what will result if our assumptions are valid and why, whether we are examining civil violence, app stores, the economy, fish markets, language evolution, or energy consumption. When we study human societies, ABMs are the tools of choice for obvious reasons: It is not ethical or safe to play what-if experiments with ourselves. The researchers in this special issue demonstrate the exciting potential in ABM. We can create our own safe virtual worlds and make discoveries that enlighten us about ourselves.","PeriodicalId":55574,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “Agent-Based Modeling for Human Behavior” Special Issue\",\"authors\":\"Soo Ling Lim;Peter J. Bentley\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/artl_e_00394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If human societies are so complex, then how can we hope to understand them? Artificial Life gives us one answer. The field of Artificial Life comprises a diverse set of introspective studies that largely ask the same questions, albeit from many different perspectives: Why are we here? Who are we? Why do we behave as we do? Starting with the origins of life provides us with fascinating answers to some of these questions. However, some researchers choose to bring their studies closer to the present day. We are, after all, human. It has been a few billion years since our ancestors were self-replicating molecules. Thus more direct studies of ourselves and our human societies can reveal truths that may lead to practical knowledge. The articles in this special issue bring together scientists who choose to perform this kind of research. Expanded from submissions to our annual Agent-Based Modelling of Human Behaviour Workshop, the studies share similar methods, all using variations of agent-based modeling (ABM) to ask their own what-if questions. As guest editors, we believe such collections help bring together and enhance such research by sharing ideas. While ABM research—out of necessity—is often highly specialized toward the hypotheses and phenomena under study, the research methodology is shared by all. We formulate our hypothesis, develop our agent-based model of the relevant aspects of reality, and run experiments to gather evidence that may support or refute the hypothesis. An experimental model that supports the hypothesis may not prove that reality follows this approach or agrees with this result, but it indicates that there exists a specific set of conditions that, if found to be true elsewhere, may produce the same result. Modeling tells us about trends, about possible likelihoods. Our ABMs show us what will result if our assumptions are valid and why, whether we are examining civil violence, app stores, the economy, fish markets, language evolution, or energy consumption. When we study human societies, ABMs are the tools of choice for obvious reasons: It is not ethical or safe to play what-if experiments with ourselves. The researchers in this special issue demonstrate the exciting potential in ABM. We can create our own safe virtual worlds and make discoveries that enlighten us about ourselves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Life\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10301993/\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Life","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10301993/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The “Agent-Based Modeling for Human Behavior” Special Issue
If human societies are so complex, then how can we hope to understand them? Artificial Life gives us one answer. The field of Artificial Life comprises a diverse set of introspective studies that largely ask the same questions, albeit from many different perspectives: Why are we here? Who are we? Why do we behave as we do? Starting with the origins of life provides us with fascinating answers to some of these questions. However, some researchers choose to bring their studies closer to the present day. We are, after all, human. It has been a few billion years since our ancestors were self-replicating molecules. Thus more direct studies of ourselves and our human societies can reveal truths that may lead to practical knowledge. The articles in this special issue bring together scientists who choose to perform this kind of research. Expanded from submissions to our annual Agent-Based Modelling of Human Behaviour Workshop, the studies share similar methods, all using variations of agent-based modeling (ABM) to ask their own what-if questions. As guest editors, we believe such collections help bring together and enhance such research by sharing ideas. While ABM research—out of necessity—is often highly specialized toward the hypotheses and phenomena under study, the research methodology is shared by all. We formulate our hypothesis, develop our agent-based model of the relevant aspects of reality, and run experiments to gather evidence that may support or refute the hypothesis. An experimental model that supports the hypothesis may not prove that reality follows this approach or agrees with this result, but it indicates that there exists a specific set of conditions that, if found to be true elsewhere, may produce the same result. Modeling tells us about trends, about possible likelihoods. Our ABMs show us what will result if our assumptions are valid and why, whether we are examining civil violence, app stores, the economy, fish markets, language evolution, or energy consumption. When we study human societies, ABMs are the tools of choice for obvious reasons: It is not ethical or safe to play what-if experiments with ourselves. The researchers in this special issue demonstrate the exciting potential in ABM. We can create our own safe virtual worlds and make discoveries that enlighten us about ourselves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Life
Artificial Life 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Life, launched in the fall of 1993, has become the unifying forum for the exchange of scientific information on the study of artificial systems that exhibit the behavioral characteristics of natural living systems, through the synthesis or simulation using computational (software), robotic (hardware), and/or physicochemical (wetware) means. Each issue features cutting-edge research on artificial life that advances the state-of-the-art of our knowledge about various aspects of living systems such as: Artificial chemistry and the origins of life Self-assembly, growth, and development Self-replication and self-repair Systems and synthetic biology Perception, cognition, and behavior Embodiment and enactivism Collective behaviors of swarms Evolutionary and ecological dynamics Open-endedness and creativity Social organization and cultural evolution Societal and technological implications Philosophy and aesthetics Applications to biology, medicine, business, education, or entertainment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信