RAND健康保险实验的设计:回顾。

IF 3 4区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Evaluation Review Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1177/0193841X20976520

Joseph P Newhouse

{"title":"RAND健康保险实验的设计:回顾。","authors":"Joseph P Newhouse","doi":"10.1177/0193841X20976520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article, prepared as part of a special issue on multiarmed experiments, describes the design of the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, paying particular attention to the choice of arms. It also describes how the results of the Experiment were used in a simulation model and, looking back, how the design might have differed, and how the results apply today, 4 decades after the Experiment was conducted.","PeriodicalId":47533,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"11-42"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0193841X20976520","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Design of the RAND Health Insurance Experiment: A Retrospective.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph P Newhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0193841X20976520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article, prepared as part of a special issue on multiarmed experiments, describes the design of the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, paying particular attention to the choice of arms. It also describes how the results of the Experiment were used in a simulation model and, looking back, how the design might have differed, and how the results apply today, 4 decades after the Experiment was conducted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation Review\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"11-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0193841X20976520\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X20976520\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X20976520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇文章，作为多武器实验特刊的一部分，描述了兰德健康保险实验的设计，特别注意武器的选择。它还描述了实验的结果是如何在模拟模型中使用的，回顾过去，设计可能会有什么不同，以及实验进行40年后的今天，结果是如何应用的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Design of the RAND Health Insurance Experiment: A Retrospective.

This article, prepared as part of a special issue on multiarmed experiments, describes the design of the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, paying particular attention to the choice of arms. It also describes how the results of the Experiment were used in a simulation model and, looking back, how the design might have differed, and how the results apply today, 4 decades after the Experiment was conducted.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Evaluation Review SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Evaluation Review is the forum for researchers, planners, and policy makers engaged in the development, implementation, and utilization of studies aimed at the betterment of the human condition. The Editors invite submission of papers reporting the findings of evaluation studies in such fields as child development, health, education, income security, manpower, mental health, criminal justice, and the physical and social environments. In addition, Evaluation Review will contain articles on methodological developments, discussions of the state of the art, and commentaries on issues related to the application of research results. Special features will include periodic review essays, "research briefs", and "craft reports".