每一个纳米步骤都很重要:对视网膜基因治疗纳米药物研究中该做和不该做的重要反思。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Karen Peynshaert, Joke Devoldere, Stefaan De Smedt, Katrien Remaut
{"title":"每一个纳米步骤都很重要:对视网膜基因治疗纳米药物研究中该做和不该做的重要反思。","authors":"Karen Peynshaert,&nbsp;Joke Devoldere,&nbsp;Stefaan De Smedt,&nbsp;Katrien Remaut","doi":"10.1080/17425247.2023.2167979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retinal disease affects millions of people worldwide, generating a massive social and economic burden. Current clinical trials for retinal diseases are dominated by gene augmentation therapies delivered with recombinant viruses as key players. As an alternative, nanoparticles hold great promise for the delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics as well. Nevertheless, despite numerous attempts, 'nano' is in practice not as successful as aspired and major breakthroughs in retinal gene therapy applying nanomaterials are yet to be seen.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, we summarize the advantages of nanomaterials and give an overview of nanoparticles designed for retinal nucleic acid delivery up to now. We furthermore critically reflect on the predominant issues that currently limit nano to progress to the clinic, where faulty study design and the absence of representative models play key roles.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Since the current approach of <i>in vitro</i> - <i>in vivo</i> experimentation is highly inefficient and creates misinformation, we advocate for a more prominent role for <i>ex vivo</i> testing early on in nanoparticle research. In addition, we elaborate on several concepts, including systematic studies and open science, which could aid in pushing the field of nanomedicine beyond the preclinical stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":12229,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery","volume":"20 2","pages":"259-271"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Every nano-step counts: a critical reflection on do's and don'ts in researching nanomedicines for retinal gene therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Peynshaert,&nbsp;Joke Devoldere,&nbsp;Stefaan De Smedt,&nbsp;Katrien Remaut\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425247.2023.2167979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retinal disease affects millions of people worldwide, generating a massive social and economic burden. Current clinical trials for retinal diseases are dominated by gene augmentation therapies delivered with recombinant viruses as key players. As an alternative, nanoparticles hold great promise for the delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics as well. Nevertheless, despite numerous attempts, 'nano' is in practice not as successful as aspired and major breakthroughs in retinal gene therapy applying nanomaterials are yet to be seen.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, we summarize the advantages of nanomaterials and give an overview of nanoparticles designed for retinal nucleic acid delivery up to now. We furthermore critically reflect on the predominant issues that currently limit nano to progress to the clinic, where faulty study design and the absence of representative models play key roles.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Since the current approach of <i>in vitro</i> - <i>in vivo</i> experimentation is highly inefficient and creates misinformation, we advocate for a more prominent role for <i>ex vivo</i> testing early on in nanoparticle research. In addition, we elaborate on several concepts, including systematic studies and open science, which could aid in pushing the field of nanomedicine beyond the preclinical stage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"259-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2023.2167979\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2023.2167979","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视网膜疾病影响着全世界数百万人,造成了巨大的社会和经济负担。目前视网膜疾病的临床试验以重组病毒为主要参与者的基因增强疗法为主。作为一种替代方案,纳米颗粒在核酸疗法的递送方面也有很大的前景。然而,尽管进行了多次尝试,“纳米”在实践中并不像期望的那样成功,应用纳米材料进行视网膜基因治疗的重大突破尚未出现。本文综述了纳米材料的优点,并对目前用于视网膜核酸传递的纳米材料进行了综述。此外,我们还批判性地反思了目前限制纳米技术向临床发展的主要问题,其中错误的研究设计和缺乏代表性模型起着关键作用。专家意见:由于目前体外-体内实验的方法效率极低,并且会产生错误信息,我们主张在纳米颗粒研究的早期,体外测试发挥更重要的作用。此外,我们详细阐述了几个概念,包括系统研究和开放科学,这有助于推动纳米医学领域超越临床前阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Every nano-step counts: a critical reflection on do's and don'ts in researching nanomedicines for retinal gene therapy.

Introduction: Retinal disease affects millions of people worldwide, generating a massive social and economic burden. Current clinical trials for retinal diseases are dominated by gene augmentation therapies delivered with recombinant viruses as key players. As an alternative, nanoparticles hold great promise for the delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics as well. Nevertheless, despite numerous attempts, 'nano' is in practice not as successful as aspired and major breakthroughs in retinal gene therapy applying nanomaterials are yet to be seen.

Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the advantages of nanomaterials and give an overview of nanoparticles designed for retinal nucleic acid delivery up to now. We furthermore critically reflect on the predominant issues that currently limit nano to progress to the clinic, where faulty study design and the absence of representative models play key roles.

Expert opinion: Since the current approach of in vitro - in vivo experimentation is highly inefficient and creates misinformation, we advocate for a more prominent role for ex vivo testing early on in nanoparticle research. In addition, we elaborate on several concepts, including systematic studies and open science, which could aid in pushing the field of nanomedicine beyond the preclinical stage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery (ISSN 1742-5247 [print], 1744-7593 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles covering all aspects of drug delivery research, from initial concept to potential therapeutic application and final relevance in clinical use. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信