COVID-19疫苗接种后腋窝淋巴结18F-FDG PET/CT摄取:与流感疫苗接种的直接比较研究

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yoichi Otomi, Takayoshi Shinya, Hiroto Kasai, Naoko Okada, Tomoki Matsushita, Kohei Higashi, Saya Matsuzaki, Yuka Hiroshima, Michiko Kubo, Hideki Otsuka, Masafumi Harada
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗接种后腋窝淋巴结18F-FDG PET/CT摄取:与流感疫苗接种的直接比较研究","authors":"Yoichi Otomi,&nbsp;Takayoshi Shinya,&nbsp;Hiroto Kasai,&nbsp;Naoko Okada,&nbsp;Tomoki Matsushita,&nbsp;Kohei Higashi,&nbsp;Saya Matsuzaki,&nbsp;Yuka Hiroshima,&nbsp;Michiko Kubo,&nbsp;Hideki Otsuka,&nbsp;Masafumi Harada","doi":"10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.27136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare vaccinated-side axillary lymph node uptake on <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and influenza vaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 177 patients who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT after COVID-19 or influenza vaccination. We compared the uptake of the vaccinated-side axillary lymph nodes of 109 COVID-19 vaccinated patients with those of a lot of influenza-vaccinated patients. We also compared the uptake between 66 patients who received the first COVID-19 vaccination with 43 who received the second COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid axillary lymph nodes on the vaccinated side were significantly more frequently observed in the COVID-19 group (45%) than in the influenza group (19%) (p<0.001). When the interval between vaccination to PET/CT was within 7 days, there was no significant difference in the frequency of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid vaccinated-side axillary lymph nodes between the groups (COVID-19 group: 41% vs. influenza group: 45%, p=0.724). When the interval was over 7 days, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid lymph nodes were much more frequent in the COVID-19 group (47%) than in the influenza group (7%) (p<0.001). Comparing the first and second COVID-19 groups, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid lymph nodes were more frequent in the second vaccination group than in the first vaccination group, but the difference was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid vaccinated-side axillary lymph nodes were more frequently observed in the COVID-19 group than in the influenza group. In the case of the COVID-19 vaccine, a delay of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT examination is recommended by a longer interval from vaccination than in the influenza vaccine.</p>","PeriodicalId":44681,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/80/ff/MIRT-32-13.PMC9950671.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Axillary Lymph Node Uptake on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Direct Comparison Study with Influenza Vaccination.\",\"authors\":\"Yoichi Otomi,&nbsp;Takayoshi Shinya,&nbsp;Hiroto Kasai,&nbsp;Naoko Okada,&nbsp;Tomoki Matsushita,&nbsp;Kohei Higashi,&nbsp;Saya Matsuzaki,&nbsp;Yuka Hiroshima,&nbsp;Michiko Kubo,&nbsp;Hideki Otsuka,&nbsp;Masafumi Harada\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.27136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare vaccinated-side axillary lymph node uptake on <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and influenza vaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 177 patients who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT after COVID-19 or influenza vaccination. We compared the uptake of the vaccinated-side axillary lymph nodes of 109 COVID-19 vaccinated patients with those of a lot of influenza-vaccinated patients. We also compared the uptake between 66 patients who received the first COVID-19 vaccination with 43 who received the second COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid axillary lymph nodes on the vaccinated side were significantly more frequently observed in the COVID-19 group (45%) than in the influenza group (19%) (p<0.001). When the interval between vaccination to PET/CT was within 7 days, there was no significant difference in the frequency of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid vaccinated-side axillary lymph nodes between the groups (COVID-19 group: 41% vs. influenza group: 45%, p=0.724). When the interval was over 7 days, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid lymph nodes were much more frequent in the COVID-19 group (47%) than in the influenza group (7%) (p<0.001). Comparing the first and second COVID-19 groups, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid lymph nodes were more frequent in the second vaccination group than in the first vaccination group, but the difference was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid vaccinated-side axillary lymph nodes were more frequently observed in the COVID-19 group than in the influenza group. In the case of the COVID-19 vaccine, a delay of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT examination is recommended by a longer interval from vaccination than in the influenza vaccine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/80/ff/MIRT-32-13.PMC9950671.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.27136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.27136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)和流感疫苗接种后接种侧腋窝淋巴结在18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)上的摄取情况。方法:回顾性分析177例在COVID-19或流感疫苗接种后接受18F-FDG PET/CT检查的患者。我们比较了109例COVID-19疫苗接种患者与大量流感疫苗接种患者接种侧腋窝淋巴结的摄取情况。我们还比较了66名首次接种COVID-19疫苗的患者与43名第二次接种COVID-19疫苗的患者之间的摄取情况。结果:新冠肺炎组免疫侧18F-FDG-avid腋窝淋巴结发生率(45%)明显高于流感组(19%)(两组间p18F-FDG-avid接种侧腋窝淋巴结发生率(41% vs.流感组:45%,p=0.724)。当间隔超过7 d时,COVID-19组的18F-FDG-avid淋巴结发生率(47%)远高于流感组(7%),而第二次接种组的p18F-FDG-avid淋巴结发生率高于第一次接种组,但差异不显著。结论:新冠肺炎组18f - fdg免疫侧腋窝淋巴结发生率高于流感组。对于COVID-19疫苗,建议延迟接种18F-FDG PET/CT检查,间隔时间比流感疫苗更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Axillary Lymph Node Uptake on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Direct Comparison Study with Influenza Vaccination.

Axillary Lymph Node Uptake on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Direct Comparison Study with Influenza Vaccination.

Axillary Lymph Node Uptake on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Direct Comparison Study with Influenza Vaccination.

Axillary Lymph Node Uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Direct Comparison Study with Influenza Vaccination.

Objectives: To compare vaccinated-side axillary lymph node uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and influenza vaccination.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 177 patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT after COVID-19 or influenza vaccination. We compared the uptake of the vaccinated-side axillary lymph nodes of 109 COVID-19 vaccinated patients with those of a lot of influenza-vaccinated patients. We also compared the uptake between 66 patients who received the first COVID-19 vaccination with 43 who received the second COVID-19 vaccination.

Results: 18F-FDG-avid axillary lymph nodes on the vaccinated side were significantly more frequently observed in the COVID-19 group (45%) than in the influenza group (19%) (p<0.001). When the interval between vaccination to PET/CT was within 7 days, there was no significant difference in the frequency of 18F-FDG-avid vaccinated-side axillary lymph nodes between the groups (COVID-19 group: 41% vs. influenza group: 45%, p=0.724). When the interval was over 7 days, 18F-FDG-avid lymph nodes were much more frequent in the COVID-19 group (47%) than in the influenza group (7%) (p<0.001). Comparing the first and second COVID-19 groups, 18F-FDG-avid lymph nodes were more frequent in the second vaccination group than in the first vaccination group, but the difference was not significant.

Conclusion: 18F-FDG-avid vaccinated-side axillary lymph nodes were more frequently observed in the COVID-19 group than in the influenza group. In the case of the COVID-19 vaccine, a delay of 18F-FDG PET/CT examination is recommended by a longer interval from vaccination than in the influenza vaccine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy
Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy (Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther, MIRT) is publishes original research articles, invited reviews, editorials, short communications, letters, consensus statements, guidelines and case reports with a literature review on the topic, in the field of molecular imaging, multimodality imaging, nuclear medicine, radionuclide therapy, radiopharmacy, medical physics, dosimetry and radiobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信