基于图像的根病严重程度自动评估技术

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Logan D. Pierz, Dilyn R. Heslinga, C. Robin Buell, Miranda J. Haus
{"title":"基于图像的根病严重程度自动评估技术","authors":"Logan D. Pierz,&nbsp;Dilyn R. Heslinga,&nbsp;C. Robin Buell,&nbsp;Miranda J. Haus","doi":"10.1002/aps3.11507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Plant disease severity assessments are used to quantify plant–pathogen interactions and identify disease-resistant lines. One common method for disease assessment involves scoring tissue manually using a semi-quantitative scale. Automating assessments would provide fast, unbiased, and quantitative measurements of root disease severity, allowing for improved consistency within and across large data sets. However, using traditional Root System Markup Language (RSML) software in the study of root responses to pathogens presents additional challenges; these include the removal of necrotic tissue during the thresholding process, which results in inaccurate image analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using PlantCV, we developed a Python-based pipeline, herein called RootDS, with two main objectives: (1) improving disease severity phenotyping and (2) generating binary images as inputs for RSML software. We tested the pipeline in common bean inoculated with Fusarium root rot.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Quantitative disease scores and root area generated by this pipeline had a strong correlation with manually curated values (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.92 and 0.90, respectively) and provided a broader capture of variation than manual disease scores. Compared to traditional manual thresholding, images generated using our pipeline did not affect RSML output.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, the RootDS pipeline provides greater functionality in disease score data sets and provides an alternative method for generating image sets for use in available RSML software.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.11507","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An image-based technique for automated root disease severity assessment using PlantCV\",\"authors\":\"Logan D. Pierz,&nbsp;Dilyn R. Heslinga,&nbsp;C. Robin Buell,&nbsp;Miranda J. Haus\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aps3.11507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Premise</h3>\\n \\n <p>Plant disease severity assessments are used to quantify plant–pathogen interactions and identify disease-resistant lines. One common method for disease assessment involves scoring tissue manually using a semi-quantitative scale. Automating assessments would provide fast, unbiased, and quantitative measurements of root disease severity, allowing for improved consistency within and across large data sets. However, using traditional Root System Markup Language (RSML) software in the study of root responses to pathogens presents additional challenges; these include the removal of necrotic tissue during the thresholding process, which results in inaccurate image analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using PlantCV, we developed a Python-based pipeline, herein called RootDS, with two main objectives: (1) improving disease severity phenotyping and (2) generating binary images as inputs for RSML software. We tested the pipeline in common bean inoculated with Fusarium root rot.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Quantitative disease scores and root area generated by this pipeline had a strong correlation with manually curated values (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.92 and 0.90, respectively) and provided a broader capture of variation than manual disease scores. Compared to traditional manual thresholding, images generated using our pipeline did not affect RSML output.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, the RootDS pipeline provides greater functionality in disease score data sets and provides an alternative method for generating image sets for use in available RSML software.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.11507\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.11507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.11507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

植物疾病严重程度评估用于量化植物与病原体的相互作用并鉴定抗病品系。疾病评估的一种常用方法是使用半定量量表对组织进行手动评分。自动化评估将提供快速、公正和定量的根病严重程度测量,从而提高大型数据集内部和之间的一致性。然而,使用传统的根系统标记语言(RSML)软件研究根对病原体的反应提出了额外的挑战;其中包括在阈值处理过程中去除坏死组织,这会导致不准确的图像分析。方法利用PlantCV,我们开发了一个基于python的管道,这里称为RootDS,主要有两个目标:(1)改善疾病严重程度表型;(2)生成二值图像作为RSML软件的输入。我们在接种了镰刀菌根腐病的普通豆上测试了该管道。结果该管道产生的定量疾病评分和根面积与人工设定的值有很强的相关性(R2分别为0.92和0.90),并且比人工疾病评分提供了更广泛的变化捕获。与传统的手动阈值处理相比,使用我们的管道生成的图像不会影响RSML输出。总的来说,RootDS管道在疾病评分数据集中提供了更大的功能,并提供了一种替代方法来生成用于可用RSML软件的图像集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An image-based technique for automated root disease severity assessment using PlantCV

An image-based technique for automated root disease severity assessment using PlantCV

Premise

Plant disease severity assessments are used to quantify plant–pathogen interactions and identify disease-resistant lines. One common method for disease assessment involves scoring tissue manually using a semi-quantitative scale. Automating assessments would provide fast, unbiased, and quantitative measurements of root disease severity, allowing for improved consistency within and across large data sets. However, using traditional Root System Markup Language (RSML) software in the study of root responses to pathogens presents additional challenges; these include the removal of necrotic tissue during the thresholding process, which results in inaccurate image analysis.

Methods

Using PlantCV, we developed a Python-based pipeline, herein called RootDS, with two main objectives: (1) improving disease severity phenotyping and (2) generating binary images as inputs for RSML software. We tested the pipeline in common bean inoculated with Fusarium root rot.

Results

Quantitative disease scores and root area generated by this pipeline had a strong correlation with manually curated values (R2 = 0.92 and 0.90, respectively) and provided a broader capture of variation than manual disease scores. Compared to traditional manual thresholding, images generated using our pipeline did not affect RSML output.

Discussion

Overall, the RootDS pipeline provides greater functionality in disease score data sets and provides an alternative method for generating image sets for use in available RSML software.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信