非传统学生对学习技术的偏好及其对学术自我效能感的影响。

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Karen Sutherland, Ginna Brock, Margarietha J de Villiers Scheepers, Prudence M Millear, Sherelle Norman, Tim Strohfeldt, Terri Downer, Nicole Masters, Alison L Black
{"title":"非传统学生对学习技术的偏好及其对学术自我效能感的影响。","authors":"Karen Sutherland, Ginna Brock, Margarietha J de Villiers Scheepers, Prudence M Millear, Sherelle Norman, Tim Strohfeldt, Terri Downer, Nicole Masters, Alison L Black","doi":"10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blended Learning (BL) as a pedagogical approach has increased in significance during the COVID-19 pandemic, with blended and online learning environments becoming the new digital norm for higher educational institutions around the globe. While BL has been discussed in the literature for thirty years, a common approach has been to categorise learner cohorts to support educators in better understanding students' relationships with learning technologies. This approach, largely unsupported by empirical evidence, has failed to adequately address the challenges of integrating learning technologies to fit with non-traditional students' preferences, their BL self-efficacy and the associated pedagogical implications. Focusing on student preference, our study presents findings from a pre-COVID survey of undergraduate students across four campuses of an Australian regional university where students shared their learning technology preferences and the self-regulated learning that influenced their academic self-efficacy in a BL context. Findings show students want consistency, relevance, and effectiveness with the use of BL tools, with a preference for lecture recordings and video resources to support their learning, while email and Facebook Messenger were preferred for communicating with peers and academic staff. Our study suggests a quality BL environment facilitates self-regulated learning using fit-for-purpose technological applications. Academic self-efficacy for BL can increase when students perceive the educational technologies used by their institution are sufficient for their learning needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-traditional students' preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Sutherland, Ginna Brock, Margarietha J de Villiers Scheepers, Prudence M Millear, Sherelle Norman, Tim Strohfeldt, Terri Downer, Nicole Masters, Alison L Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Blended Learning (BL) as a pedagogical approach has increased in significance during the COVID-19 pandemic, with blended and online learning environments becoming the new digital norm for higher educational institutions around the globe. While BL has been discussed in the literature for thirty years, a common approach has been to categorise learner cohorts to support educators in better understanding students' relationships with learning technologies. This approach, largely unsupported by empirical evidence, has failed to adequately address the challenges of integrating learning technologies to fit with non-traditional students' preferences, their BL self-efficacy and the associated pedagogical implications. Focusing on student preference, our study presents findings from a pre-COVID survey of undergraduate students across four campuses of an Australian regional university where students shared their learning technology preferences and the self-regulated learning that influenced their academic self-efficacy in a BL context. Findings show students want consistency, relevance, and effectiveness with the use of BL tools, with a preference for lecture recordings and video resources to support their learning, while email and Facebook Messenger were preferred for communicating with peers and academic staff. Our study suggests a quality BL environment facilitates self-regulated learning using fit-for-purpose technological applications. Academic self-efficacy for BL can increase when students perceive the educational technologies used by their institution are sufficient for their learning needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computing in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872746/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computing in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,混合式学习(BL)作为一种教学方法的重要性与日俱增,混合式和在线学习环境已成为全球高等教育机构的新数字规范。虽然学习方法在文献中已经讨论了三十年,但常见的方法是对学习者群体进行分类,以帮助教育者更好地了解学生与学习技术之间的关系。这种方法在很大程度上缺乏经验证据的支持,未能充分应对整合学习技术以适应非传统学生的偏好、他们的基本法自我效能感以及相关的教学影响等挑战。我们的研究以学生的偏好为重点,介绍了对澳大利亚一所地区大学四个校区的本科生进行的COVID前调查的结果,学生们在调查中分享了他们对学习技术的偏好,以及在基本法背景下影响他们学术自我效能的自我调节学习。研究结果表明,学生希望使用基础教育工具的一致性、相关性和有效性,偏好使用讲座录音和视频资源来支持他们的学习,而电子邮件和 Facebook Messenger 则是与同学和教职员工交流的首选。我们的研究表明,优质的基础教育环境有利于学生利用适合目的的技术应用进行自我调节学习。当学生认为他们所在学校使用的教育技术足以满足他们的学习需求时,他们对基本法的学术自我效能感就会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-traditional students' preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy.

Blended Learning (BL) as a pedagogical approach has increased in significance during the COVID-19 pandemic, with blended and online learning environments becoming the new digital norm for higher educational institutions around the globe. While BL has been discussed in the literature for thirty years, a common approach has been to categorise learner cohorts to support educators in better understanding students' relationships with learning technologies. This approach, largely unsupported by empirical evidence, has failed to adequately address the challenges of integrating learning technologies to fit with non-traditional students' preferences, their BL self-efficacy and the associated pedagogical implications. Focusing on student preference, our study presents findings from a pre-COVID survey of undergraduate students across four campuses of an Australian regional university where students shared their learning technology preferences and the self-regulated learning that influenced their academic self-efficacy in a BL context. Findings show students want consistency, relevance, and effectiveness with the use of BL tools, with a preference for lecture recordings and video resources to support their learning, while email and Facebook Messenger were preferred for communicating with peers and academic staff. Our study suggests a quality BL environment facilitates self-regulated learning using fit-for-purpose technological applications. Academic self-efficacy for BL can increase when students perceive the educational technologies used by their institution are sufficient for their learning needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Journal of Computing in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Journal of Computing in Higher Education (JCHE) contributes to our understanding of the design, development, and implementation of instructional processes and technologies in higher education. JCHE publishes original research, literature reviews, implementation and evaluation studies, and theoretical, conceptual, and policy papers that provide perspectives on instructional technology’s role in improving access, affordability, and outcomes of postsecondary education.  Priority is given to well-documented original papers that demonstrate a strong grounding in learning theory and/or rigorous educational research design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信