早期改用口服抗生素治疗细菌性脊椎骨髓炎患者:四级中心经验、系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Matteo Passerini, Julian Maamari, Tarek Nayfeh, Leslie C Hassett, Aaron J Tande, Mohammad H Murad, Zelalem Temesgen, Elie F Berbari
{"title":"早期改用口服抗生素治疗细菌性脊椎骨髓炎患者:四级中心经验、系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Matteo Passerini,&nbsp;Julian Maamari,&nbsp;Tarek Nayfeh,&nbsp;Leslie C Hassett,&nbsp;Aaron J Tande,&nbsp;Mohammad H Murad,&nbsp;Zelalem Temesgen,&nbsp;Elie F Berbari","doi":"10.5194/jbji-7-249-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent data suggest that oral therapy can be effective for bone infections. We aim to assess the efficacy of an early switch to oral therapy ( <math><mrow><mo><</mo> <mn>2</mn></mrow> </math>  weeks) compared to a non-early switch in bacterial native vertebral osteomyelitis. We conducted a cohort study at Mayo Clinic, Rochester (MN), between 2019-2021 combined with a systematic review, which queried multiple databases. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model. The cohort study included 139 patients: two received an early switch. Of 3708 citations, 13 studies were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in treatment failure (odds ratio  <math><mo>=</mo></math>  1.073, 95 % confidence interval 0.370-3.116), but many studies presented high risk of bias. Current evidence is insufficient to conclude the proportion of patients with failure or relapse is different in the two groups. High-quality studies are warranted before early switch can be routinely recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"7 6","pages":"249-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752704/pdf/jbji-7-249.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early switch to oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of patients with bacterial native vertebral osteomyelitis: a quaternary center experience, systematic review, and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Passerini,&nbsp;Julian Maamari,&nbsp;Tarek Nayfeh,&nbsp;Leslie C Hassett,&nbsp;Aaron J Tande,&nbsp;Mohammad H Murad,&nbsp;Zelalem Temesgen,&nbsp;Elie F Berbari\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/jbji-7-249-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent data suggest that oral therapy can be effective for bone infections. We aim to assess the efficacy of an early switch to oral therapy ( <math><mrow><mo><</mo> <mn>2</mn></mrow> </math>  weeks) compared to a non-early switch in bacterial native vertebral osteomyelitis. We conducted a cohort study at Mayo Clinic, Rochester (MN), between 2019-2021 combined with a systematic review, which queried multiple databases. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model. The cohort study included 139 patients: two received an early switch. Of 3708 citations, 13 studies were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in treatment failure (odds ratio  <math><mo>=</mo></math>  1.073, 95 % confidence interval 0.370-3.116), but many studies presented high risk of bias. Current evidence is insufficient to conclude the proportion of patients with failure or relapse is different in the two groups. High-quality studies are warranted before early switch can be routinely recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection\",\"volume\":\"7 6\",\"pages\":\"249-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752704/pdf/jbji-7-249.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-249-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-249-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近的数据表明,口服治疗对骨感染有效。我们的目的是评估早期转向口服治疗(2周)与非早期转向细菌性原生椎体骨髓炎的疗效。我们在2019-2021年期间在罗切斯特(MN)梅奥诊所进行了一项队列研究,并结合了系统评价,查询了多个数据库。数据分析采用随机效应模型。该队列研究包括139例患者:2例接受了早期转换。在3708次引用中,13项研究被纳入最终分析。meta分析显示治疗失败无差异(优势比 = 1.073,95% %置信区间0.370-3.116),但许多研究存在高偏倚风险。目前的证据不足以得出两组患者失败或复发的比例不同的结论。在常规建议早期转换之前,需要进行高质量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Early switch to oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of patients with bacterial native vertebral osteomyelitis: a quaternary center experience, systematic review, and meta-analysis.

Early switch to oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of patients with bacterial native vertebral osteomyelitis: a quaternary center experience, systematic review, and meta-analysis.

Recent data suggest that oral therapy can be effective for bone infections. We aim to assess the efficacy of an early switch to oral therapy ( < 2  weeks) compared to a non-early switch in bacterial native vertebral osteomyelitis. We conducted a cohort study at Mayo Clinic, Rochester (MN), between 2019-2021 combined with a systematic review, which queried multiple databases. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model. The cohort study included 139 patients: two received an early switch. Of 3708 citations, 13 studies were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in treatment failure (odds ratio  =  1.073, 95 % confidence interval 0.370-3.116), but many studies presented high risk of bias. Current evidence is insufficient to conclude the proportion of patients with failure or relapse is different in the two groups. High-quality studies are warranted before early switch can be routinely recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信