新的算法方法,更容易和更快的扩展残疾状态量表计算。

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Amr M Fouad, Maged Abdel Naseer, Marwa Farghaly, Mohamed I Hegazy
{"title":"新的算法方法,更容易和更快的扩展残疾状态量表计算。","authors":"Amr M Fouad,&nbsp;Maged Abdel Naseer,&nbsp;Marwa Farghaly,&nbsp;Mohamed I Hegazy","doi":"10.1177/20552173231155055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional paper and pencil method for EDSS calculation (pEDSS) is the cornerstone of multiple sclerosis practice; however, it requires an expert for an accurate calculation, and it takes a lot of time to perform the function scores. A new algorithmic approach (aEDSS) has been developed for easier and faster assessment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if using aEDSS can achieve good inter-rater agreement and save time compared to pEDSS.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This study was conducted on 200 MS patients; EDSS was performed twice for each patient by two neurologists on the same day; one used the pEDSS, and the other used the aEDSS in a random order to test the inter-rater agreement regarding functional system scores and the final EDSS score and to detect the difference in the time needed for calculation between both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The new algorithmic approach achieved excellent agreement with the traditional method (Kappa > 0.81) with a shorter calculation time (16 ± 2.67 min for aEDSS vs 31 ± 4.3 min for pEDSS, <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new algorithmic approach could represent a suitable alternative to the traditional method, making EDSS calculation easier and faster.</p>","PeriodicalId":18961,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","volume":"9 1","pages":"20552173231155055"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dc/69/10.1177_20552173231155055.PMC9936401.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation.\",\"authors\":\"Amr M Fouad,&nbsp;Maged Abdel Naseer,&nbsp;Marwa Farghaly,&nbsp;Mohamed I Hegazy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552173231155055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional paper and pencil method for EDSS calculation (pEDSS) is the cornerstone of multiple sclerosis practice; however, it requires an expert for an accurate calculation, and it takes a lot of time to perform the function scores. A new algorithmic approach (aEDSS) has been developed for easier and faster assessment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if using aEDSS can achieve good inter-rater agreement and save time compared to pEDSS.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This study was conducted on 200 MS patients; EDSS was performed twice for each patient by two neurologists on the same day; one used the pEDSS, and the other used the aEDSS in a random order to test the inter-rater agreement regarding functional system scores and the final EDSS score and to detect the difference in the time needed for calculation between both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The new algorithmic approach achieved excellent agreement with the traditional method (Kappa > 0.81) with a shorter calculation time (16 ± 2.67 min for aEDSS vs 31 ± 4.3 min for pEDSS, <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new algorithmic approach could represent a suitable alternative to the traditional method, making EDSS calculation easier and faster.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"20552173231155055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dc/69/10.1177_20552173231155055.PMC9936401.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173231155055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173231155055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:传统的纸笔法计算EDSS (pEDSS)是多发性硬化症实践的基石;但是,它需要专家进行准确的计算,并且需要花费大量时间来执行函数得分。一种新的算法方法(aEDSS)已经发展为更容易和更快的评估。目的:确定与pEDSS相比,使用aEDSS是否能达到良好的评分一致性并节省时间。对象和方法:本研究纳入200例MS患者;EDSS由两名神经科医生在同一天为每位患者进行两次;一组使用pEDSS,另一组以随机顺序使用aEDSS来测试评分者对功能系统评分和最终EDSS评分的一致性,并检测两种方法计算所需时间的差异。结果:新算法与传统方法吻合良好(Kappa > 0.81),计算时间更短(aEDSS为16±2.67 min, pEDSS为31±4.3 min, P < 0.0001)。结论:新算法可替代传统方法,使EDSS计算更简单、更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation.

New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation.

New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation.

New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation.

Background: The traditional paper and pencil method for EDSS calculation (pEDSS) is the cornerstone of multiple sclerosis practice; however, it requires an expert for an accurate calculation, and it takes a lot of time to perform the function scores. A new algorithmic approach (aEDSS) has been developed for easier and faster assessment.

Objective: To determine if using aEDSS can achieve good inter-rater agreement and save time compared to pEDSS.

Subjects and methods: This study was conducted on 200 MS patients; EDSS was performed twice for each patient by two neurologists on the same day; one used the pEDSS, and the other used the aEDSS in a random order to test the inter-rater agreement regarding functional system scores and the final EDSS score and to detect the difference in the time needed for calculation between both methods.

Results: The new algorithmic approach achieved excellent agreement with the traditional method (Kappa > 0.81) with a shorter calculation time (16 ± 2.67 min for aEDSS vs 31 ± 4.3 min for pEDSS, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The new algorithmic approach could represent a suitable alternative to the traditional method, making EDSS calculation easier and faster.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信