[¿Anafilaxia perioperatoria ?casos系列)。

Alicia Méndez-Gómez, Nayeli Servín-Suárez, Héctor Carrillo-Murillo, Eduardo Torres-Rojo, Karla Korkowski-Uviña, Itzel Vianney Ochoa-García
{"title":"[¿Anafilaxia perioperatoria ?casos系列)。","authors":"Alicia Méndez-Gómez, Nayeli Servín-Suárez, Héctor Carrillo-Murillo, Eduardo Torres-Rojo, Karla Korkowski-Uviña, Itzel Vianney Ochoa-García","doi":"10.29262/ram.v70i3.1273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify the causative agent of POH, to avoid re-exposure and assess the use of alternative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10 cases of immediate POH are described, in all of them a history of previous surgical procedures, carrying out a 3-step protocol: 1st documenting the surgical record to identify exposures, 2nd performing skin and/or epicutaneous tests and 3rd searching for an alternative treatment. treatment if a new surgical procedure is required and in selected cases challenge tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 10 patients with immediate POH, tests were performed according to the case: neuromuscular blockers, anesthetics, opioids, NSAIDs, anti- biotics, diuretics, latex, isodine, and chlorhexidine; finding positive tests in 7 (70%) patients: in 4 (40%) neuromuscular blockers, one of them also positive for latex, in 2 (20%) anesthetics and finally finding a pharmacological alternative in 2 (2%) and recommending free operating room latex in 2 cases (20%), the rest (30%) were classified as related to the surgical procedure and medication management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study of POH is focused on ensuring safety in subsequent exposures, so in addition to identifying the causative agent, the role of the allergist also leads to a search for a safe alternative in patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":101421,"journal":{"name":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","volume":"70 4","pages":"187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[¿Anafilaxia perioperatoria? Serie de casos].\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Méndez-Gómez, Nayeli Servín-Suárez, Héctor Carrillo-Murillo, Eduardo Torres-Rojo, Karla Korkowski-Uviña, Itzel Vianney Ochoa-García\",\"doi\":\"10.29262/ram.v70i3.1273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify the causative agent of POH, to avoid re-exposure and assess the use of alternative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10 cases of immediate POH are described, in all of them a history of previous surgical procedures, carrying out a 3-step protocol: 1st documenting the surgical record to identify exposures, 2nd performing skin and/or epicutaneous tests and 3rd searching for an alternative treatment. treatment if a new surgical procedure is required and in selected cases challenge tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 10 patients with immediate POH, tests were performed according to the case: neuromuscular blockers, anesthetics, opioids, NSAIDs, anti- biotics, diuretics, latex, isodine, and chlorhexidine; finding positive tests in 7 (70%) patients: in 4 (40%) neuromuscular blockers, one of them also positive for latex, in 2 (20%) anesthetics and finally finding a pharmacological alternative in 2 (2%) and recommending free operating room latex in 2 cases (20%), the rest (30%) were classified as related to the surgical procedure and medication management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study of POH is focused on ensuring safety in subsequent exposures, so in addition to identifying the causative agent, the role of the allergist also leads to a search for a safe alternative in patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v70i3.1273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v70i3.1273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:查明POH的致病因素,避免再次暴露,评价替代治疗的使用情况。方法:本文描述了10例即时POH病例,所有病例均有既往手术史,执行三步方案:第一步记录手术记录以确定暴露,第二步进行皮肤和/或表皮试验,第三步寻找替代治疗方法。如果需要新的外科手术治疗,在选定的情况下挑战测试。结果:共有10例即刻POH患者,根据病例进行了检查:神经肌肉阻滞剂、麻醉剂、阿片类药物、非甾体抗炎药、抗生素、利尿剂、乳胶、异嘌呤、氯己定;7例(70%)患者检测阳性:4例(40%)神经肌肉阻滞剂,其中1例乳胶阳性,2例(20%)麻醉药,2例(2%)最终找到药物替代,2例(20%)推荐免费手术室乳胶,其余(30%)被分类为与手术和药物管理有关。结论:对POH的研究重点是确保后续接触的安全性,因此除了确定病原体外,过敏症专科医生的作用还导致在患者管理中寻找安全的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[¿Anafilaxia perioperatoria? Serie de casos].

Objective: Identify the causative agent of POH, to avoid re-exposure and assess the use of alternative treatment.

Methods: 10 cases of immediate POH are described, in all of them a history of previous surgical procedures, carrying out a 3-step protocol: 1st documenting the surgical record to identify exposures, 2nd performing skin and/or epicutaneous tests and 3rd searching for an alternative treatment. treatment if a new surgical procedure is required and in selected cases challenge tests.

Results: Of a total of 10 patients with immediate POH, tests were performed according to the case: neuromuscular blockers, anesthetics, opioids, NSAIDs, anti- biotics, diuretics, latex, isodine, and chlorhexidine; finding positive tests in 7 (70%) patients: in 4 (40%) neuromuscular blockers, one of them also positive for latex, in 2 (20%) anesthetics and finally finding a pharmacological alternative in 2 (2%) and recommending free operating room latex in 2 cases (20%), the rest (30%) were classified as related to the surgical procedure and medication management.

Conclusions: The study of POH is focused on ensuring safety in subsequent exposures, so in addition to identifying the causative agent, the role of the allergist also leads to a search for a safe alternative in patient management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信