粤语版SarQoL在香港老年人口中的翻译、文化适应和验证:一份评估骨骼肌减少症特异性生活质量的访谈问卷。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2023-11-09 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S431218
Ruby Yu, Derek Lai, Grace Leung, Lok-Yan Tam, Clara Cheng, Sara Kong, Cecilia Tong, Zhihui Lu, Jason C S Leung, Amany Chan, Timothy Kwok, Jean Woo
{"title":"粤语版SarQoL在香港老年人口中的翻译、文化适应和验证:一份评估骨骼肌减少症特异性生活质量的访谈问卷。","authors":"Ruby Yu, Derek Lai, Grace Leung, Lok-Yan Tam, Clara Cheng, Sara Kong, Cecilia Tong, Zhihui Lu, Jason C S Leung, Amany Chan, Timothy Kwok, Jean Woo","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S431218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the psychometric properties of the Cantonese version of the SarQoL<sup>®</sup> questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 118 (including 60 non-sarcopenic and 58 sarcopenic) community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or above with Cantonese as their mother tongue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Translation and cultural adaptation of the SarQoL were conducted using a standardized protocol. To validate the Cantonese SarQoL, psychometric properties including discriminative power, reliability (including internal consistency and test-retest reliability), and construct validity (including convergent and divergent validity), as well as floor and ceiling effects, were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translation of the questionnaire was completed without significant difficulties. Results indicated that the Cantonese SarQoL had (1) good discriminative power (sarcopenic participants had lower overall scores, mean = 66.1 vs 75.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001; the overall score was negatively predictive of the presence of sarcopenia, adjusted OR = 0.949, 95% CI = [0.912, 0.983]), (2) good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.835; correlations between domain and overall scores ranged from 0.576 to 0.868), (3) excellent test-retest agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.801), (4) good construct validity (convergent: moderate to strong correlations were found between the overall score and almost all of the SF-36 and EQ-5D domains; divergent: weaker correlations were found between the overall score and SF-36 social functioning, <i>ρ</i> = -0.098, and EQ-5D self-care, <i>ρ</i> = -0.331), and (5) no floor or ceiling effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Cantonese SarQoL is valid and reliable, and thus can be used as an interviewer-administered questionnaire for assessing sarcopenia-specific quality of life in fieldwork practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Cantonese Version of SarQoL in Hong Kong's Older Population: An Interviewer-Administered Questionnaire for Assessing Sarcopenia-Specific Quality of Life in Fieldwork Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Ruby Yu, Derek Lai, Grace Leung, Lok-Yan Tam, Clara Cheng, Sara Kong, Cecilia Tong, Zhihui Lu, Jason C S Leung, Amany Chan, Timothy Kwok, Jean Woo\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CIA.S431218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the psychometric properties of the Cantonese version of the SarQoL<sup>®</sup> questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 118 (including 60 non-sarcopenic and 58 sarcopenic) community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or above with Cantonese as their mother tongue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Translation and cultural adaptation of the SarQoL were conducted using a standardized protocol. To validate the Cantonese SarQoL, psychometric properties including discriminative power, reliability (including internal consistency and test-retest reliability), and construct validity (including convergent and divergent validity), as well as floor and ceiling effects, were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translation of the questionnaire was completed without significant difficulties. Results indicated that the Cantonese SarQoL had (1) good discriminative power (sarcopenic participants had lower overall scores, mean = 66.1 vs 75.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001; the overall score was negatively predictive of the presence of sarcopenia, adjusted OR = 0.949, 95% CI = [0.912, 0.983]), (2) good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.835; correlations between domain and overall scores ranged from 0.576 to 0.868), (3) excellent test-retest agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.801), (4) good construct validity (convergent: moderate to strong correlations were found between the overall score and almost all of the SF-36 and EQ-5D domains; divergent: weaker correlations were found between the overall score and SF-36 social functioning, <i>ρ</i> = -0.098, and EQ-5D self-care, <i>ρ</i> = -0.331), and (5) no floor or ceiling effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Cantonese SarQoL is valid and reliable, and thus can be used as an interviewer-administered questionnaire for assessing sarcopenia-specific quality of life in fieldwork practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Interventions in Aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642387/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Interventions in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S431218\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S431218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨粤语版SarQoL®问卷的心理测量特性。参与者:共118名65岁或以上以广东话为母语的社区长者(包括60名非肌萎缩症患者及58名肌萎缩症患者)。方法:采用标准化的翻译方案对SarQoL进行翻译和文化改编。为了验证广东话SarQoL,我们评估了包括判别力、信度(包括内部一致性和重测信度)、结构效度(包括收敛效度和发散效度)以及地板效应和天花板效应在内的心理测量学性质。结果:问卷翻译完成无明显困难。结果表明广东式SarQoL具有(1)较好的判别能力(肌少症患者总分较低,平均值= 66.1 vs 75.0, p < 0.001;总体评分对肌肉减少症的存在呈负预测,调整后OR = 0.949, 95% CI =[0.912, 0.983]),(2)内部一致性好(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.835;域与总分的相关系数为0.576 ~ 0.868),(3)重测一致性好(类内相关系数= 0.801),(4)结构效度好(总体得分与SF-36和EQ-5D的几乎所有域均存在中至强的收敛性相关;发散性:总体得分与SF-36社会功能(ρ = -0.098)和EQ-5D自我照顾(ρ = -0.331)之间的相关性较弱,(5)没有下限或上限效应。结论:广东话SarQoL是一份有效、可靠的问卷,可作为实地实习中评估肌肉减少症患者生活质量的问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Cantonese Version of SarQoL in Hong Kong's Older Population: An Interviewer-Administered Questionnaire for Assessing Sarcopenia-Specific Quality of Life in Fieldwork Practice.

Objective: This study examined the psychometric properties of the Cantonese version of the SarQoL® questionnaire.

Participants: A total of 118 (including 60 non-sarcopenic and 58 sarcopenic) community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or above with Cantonese as their mother tongue.

Methods: Translation and cultural adaptation of the SarQoL were conducted using a standardized protocol. To validate the Cantonese SarQoL, psychometric properties including discriminative power, reliability (including internal consistency and test-retest reliability), and construct validity (including convergent and divergent validity), as well as floor and ceiling effects, were assessed.

Results: The translation of the questionnaire was completed without significant difficulties. Results indicated that the Cantonese SarQoL had (1) good discriminative power (sarcopenic participants had lower overall scores, mean = 66.1 vs 75.0, p < 0.001; the overall score was negatively predictive of the presence of sarcopenia, adjusted OR = 0.949, 95% CI = [0.912, 0.983]), (2) good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.835; correlations between domain and overall scores ranged from 0.576 to 0.868), (3) excellent test-retest agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.801), (4) good construct validity (convergent: moderate to strong correlations were found between the overall score and almost all of the SF-36 and EQ-5D domains; divergent: weaker correlations were found between the overall score and SF-36 social functioning, ρ = -0.098, and EQ-5D self-care, ρ = -0.331), and (5) no floor or ceiling effect.

Conclusion: The Cantonese SarQoL is valid and reliable, and thus can be used as an interviewer-administered questionnaire for assessing sarcopenia-specific quality of life in fieldwork practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信