Paul Hofmann, Andreas Kunz, Franziska Schmidt, Florian Beuer, Dirk Duddeck
{"title":"使用基于像素的机器学习对两件式基台上与加工相关的污染进行分段。新的量化方法?","authors":"Paul Hofmann, Andreas Kunz, Franziska Schmidt, Florian Beuer, Dirk Duddeck","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b3916799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A reference method for quantifying contaminations on two-piece abutments manufactured using CAD/CAM has not yet been established. In the present in vitro study, a pixel--based machine learning (ML) method for detecting contamination on customized two-piece abutments was investigated and embedded in a semiautomated quantification pipeline.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-nine CAD/CAM zirconia abutments were fabricated and bonded to a prefabricated titanium base. All samples were analyzed for contamination by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging followed by pixel--based ML and thresholding (SW) for contamination detection; quantification was performed in the postprocessing pipeline. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Bland-Altmann plot were applied to compare both methods. The contaminated area fraction was recorded as a percentage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between the percentages of contamination areas (median = 0.004) measured with ML (median = 0.008) and with SW (median = 0.012), asymptotic Wilcoxon test: P = 0.22. The Bland-Altmann plot demonstrated a mean difference of -0.006% (95% confidence interval [CI] from -0.011% to 0.0001%) with increased values from a contamination area fraction of > 0.03% for ML.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both segmentation methods showed comparable results in evaluating surface cleanliness; pixel-based ML is a promising assessment tool for detecting external contaminations on zirconia abutments. Further studies are required to investigate the clinical performance of this tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"89-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Segmentation of process-related contaminations on two-piece abutments using pixel-based machine learning: a new quantification approach?\",\"authors\":\"Paul Hofmann, Andreas Kunz, Franziska Schmidt, Florian Beuer, Dirk Duddeck\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.ijcd.b3916799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A reference method for quantifying contaminations on two-piece abutments manufactured using CAD/CAM has not yet been established. In the present in vitro study, a pixel--based machine learning (ML) method for detecting contamination on customized two-piece abutments was investigated and embedded in a semiautomated quantification pipeline.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-nine CAD/CAM zirconia abutments were fabricated and bonded to a prefabricated titanium base. All samples were analyzed for contamination by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging followed by pixel--based ML and thresholding (SW) for contamination detection; quantification was performed in the postprocessing pipeline. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Bland-Altmann plot were applied to compare both methods. The contaminated area fraction was recorded as a percentage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between the percentages of contamination areas (median = 0.004) measured with ML (median = 0.008) and with SW (median = 0.012), asymptotic Wilcoxon test: P = 0.22. The Bland-Altmann plot demonstrated a mean difference of -0.006% (95% confidence interval [CI] from -0.011% to 0.0001%) with increased values from a contamination area fraction of > 0.03% for ML.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both segmentation methods showed comparable results in evaluating surface cleanliness; pixel-based ML is a promising assessment tool for detecting external contaminations on zirconia abutments. Further studies are required to investigate the clinical performance of this tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"89-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b3916799\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b3916799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Segmentation of process-related contaminations on two-piece abutments using pixel-based machine learning: a new quantification approach?
Purpose: A reference method for quantifying contaminations on two-piece abutments manufactured using CAD/CAM has not yet been established. In the present in vitro study, a pixel--based machine learning (ML) method for detecting contamination on customized two-piece abutments was investigated and embedded in a semiautomated quantification pipeline.
Materials and methods: Forty-nine CAD/CAM zirconia abutments were fabricated and bonded to a prefabricated titanium base. All samples were analyzed for contamination by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging followed by pixel--based ML and thresholding (SW) for contamination detection; quantification was performed in the postprocessing pipeline. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Bland-Altmann plot were applied to compare both methods. The contaminated area fraction was recorded as a percentage.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the percentages of contamination areas (median = 0.004) measured with ML (median = 0.008) and with SW (median = 0.012), asymptotic Wilcoxon test: P = 0.22. The Bland-Altmann plot demonstrated a mean difference of -0.006% (95% confidence interval [CI] from -0.011% to 0.0001%) with increased values from a contamination area fraction of > 0.03% for ML.
Conclusion: Both segmentation methods showed comparable results in evaluating surface cleanliness; pixel-based ML is a promising assessment tool for detecting external contaminations on zirconia abutments. Further studies are required to investigate the clinical performance of this tool.
期刊介绍:
This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.