{"title":"横腹功能与俱乐部板球运动员俯卧平板支撑和板凳支撑时间相关吗?","authors":"K D Aginsky, K Keen, N Neophytou","doi":"10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a12984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bridge and plank holding times are used to evaluate core stability. Transversus abdominis (TA) muscle function is assessed using ultrasound and also provides input on an individual's core stability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A correlation study comparing TA muscle function with bridge and plank holding time in club cricketers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen male, premier league cricketers (age: 22.1 ± 3.3 years) participated in this study. Ultrasound was used to measure bilateral TA, internal oblique (OI) and external oblique (OE) muscle thickness at rest and during abdominal hollowing. Muscle function was measured by means of a Pearson's correlation as the change in muscle thickness from rest to abdominal hollowing and compared to holding time of the bench bridge and prone plank (seconds).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TA muscle thickness was preferentially recruited bilaterally (p=0.00001) during abdominal hollowing. No significant correlations were found between TA muscle function and holding time for the bench bridge (dominant (D): r = 0.03 [95% CI:-0.46-0.50]; non-dominant (ND): r = -0.02 [95% CI:-0.50-0.47]) or prone plank (D: r = -0.16 [95% CI:-0.60-0.34]; ND: r = -0.13 [95% CI:-0.57-0.38]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prone plank and bench bridge holding times are not correlated with TA muscle function during abdominal hollowing. Core stability cannot rely on a single test to evaluate its effectiveness. In particular, the contribution of the local and global muscle system to 'core stability' needs to be evaluated independently. Therefore these tests are not sensitive enough to evaluate the contribution of the local muscle system to the global muscle system in a healthy, pain free, sporting population.</p>","PeriodicalId":31065,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"v34i1a12984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does transversus abdominis function correlate with prone plank and bench bridge holding time in club cricket players?\",\"authors\":\"K D Aginsky, K Keen, N Neophytou\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a12984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bridge and plank holding times are used to evaluate core stability. Transversus abdominis (TA) muscle function is assessed using ultrasound and also provides input on an individual's core stability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A correlation study comparing TA muscle function with bridge and plank holding time in club cricketers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen male, premier league cricketers (age: 22.1 ± 3.3 years) participated in this study. Ultrasound was used to measure bilateral TA, internal oblique (OI) and external oblique (OE) muscle thickness at rest and during abdominal hollowing. Muscle function was measured by means of a Pearson's correlation as the change in muscle thickness from rest to abdominal hollowing and compared to holding time of the bench bridge and prone plank (seconds).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TA muscle thickness was preferentially recruited bilaterally (p=0.00001) during abdominal hollowing. No significant correlations were found between TA muscle function and holding time for the bench bridge (dominant (D): r = 0.03 [95% CI:-0.46-0.50]; non-dominant (ND): r = -0.02 [95% CI:-0.50-0.47]) or prone plank (D: r = -0.16 [95% CI:-0.60-0.34]; ND: r = -0.13 [95% CI:-0.57-0.38]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prone plank and bench bridge holding times are not correlated with TA muscle function during abdominal hollowing. Core stability cannot rely on a single test to evaluate its effectiveness. In particular, the contribution of the local and global muscle system to 'core stability' needs to be evaluated independently. Therefore these tests are not sensitive enough to evaluate the contribution of the local muscle system to the global muscle system in a healthy, pain free, sporting population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"v34i1a12984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a12984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a12984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:桥和板保持时间用来评估核心稳定性。腹横肌(TA)功能是用超声波评估的,也提供了个人核心稳定性的输入。目的:探讨俱乐部板球运动员TA肌功能与桥、板支撑时间的相关性。方法:17名男性超级联赛板球运动员(年龄:22.1±3.3岁)参与本研究。超声测量双侧TA、内斜肌(OI)和外斜肌(OE)在静息和腹空期间的厚度。肌肉功能通过Pearson相关性测量肌肉厚度从休息到腹部凹陷的变化,并与板凳桥和俯卧平板支撑时间(秒)进行比较。结果:腹空术中TA肌厚度优先增加(p=0.00001)。TA肌功能与板凳桥保持时间无显著相关性(优势(D): r = 0.03 [95% CI:-0.46-0.50];非惯用(ND): r = -0.02(95%置信区间:-0.50—-0.47))或木板(D: r = -0.16(95%置信区间:-0.60—-0.34);ND: r = -0.13 [95% CI:-0.57-0.38])。结论:俯卧平板支撑和卧桥支撑时间与腹部空心化时TA肌功能无关。核心稳定性不能依靠单一的测试来评估其有效性。特别是,局部和全局肌肉系统对“核心稳定性”的贡献需要独立评估。因此,在健康、无疼痛、运动人群中,这些测试不够敏感,无法评估局部肌肉系统对整体肌肉系统的贡献。
Does transversus abdominis function correlate with prone plank and bench bridge holding time in club cricket players?
Background: Bridge and plank holding times are used to evaluate core stability. Transversus abdominis (TA) muscle function is assessed using ultrasound and also provides input on an individual's core stability.
Objectives: A correlation study comparing TA muscle function with bridge and plank holding time in club cricketers.
Methods: Seventeen male, premier league cricketers (age: 22.1 ± 3.3 years) participated in this study. Ultrasound was used to measure bilateral TA, internal oblique (OI) and external oblique (OE) muscle thickness at rest and during abdominal hollowing. Muscle function was measured by means of a Pearson's correlation as the change in muscle thickness from rest to abdominal hollowing and compared to holding time of the bench bridge and prone plank (seconds).
Results: TA muscle thickness was preferentially recruited bilaterally (p=0.00001) during abdominal hollowing. No significant correlations were found between TA muscle function and holding time for the bench bridge (dominant (D): r = 0.03 [95% CI:-0.46-0.50]; non-dominant (ND): r = -0.02 [95% CI:-0.50-0.47]) or prone plank (D: r = -0.16 [95% CI:-0.60-0.34]; ND: r = -0.13 [95% CI:-0.57-0.38]).
Conclusion: Prone plank and bench bridge holding times are not correlated with TA muscle function during abdominal hollowing. Core stability cannot rely on a single test to evaluate its effectiveness. In particular, the contribution of the local and global muscle system to 'core stability' needs to be evaluated independently. Therefore these tests are not sensitive enough to evaluate the contribution of the local muscle system to the global muscle system in a healthy, pain free, sporting population.