剖宫产术后区域麻醉与全身麻醉对生命功能的影响:单中心经验。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Danka Mostic Stanisic, Nevena Kalezic, Nina Rajovic, Tatjana Ilic Mostic, Jelena Cumic, Tamara Stanisavljevic, Aleksandra Beleslin, Jelena Stulic, Ivana Rudic, Nevena Divac, Natasa Milic, Radan Stojanovic
{"title":"剖宫产术后区域麻醉与全身麻醉对生命功能的影响:单中心经验。","authors":"Danka Mostic Stanisic,&nbsp;Nevena Kalezic,&nbsp;Nina Rajovic,&nbsp;Tatjana Ilic Mostic,&nbsp;Jelena Cumic,&nbsp;Tamara Stanisavljevic,&nbsp;Aleksandra Beleslin,&nbsp;Jelena Stulic,&nbsp;Ivana Rudic,&nbsp;Nevena Divac,&nbsp;Natasa Milic,&nbsp;Radan Stojanovic","doi":"10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim was to determine the effect of regional anesthesia (RA) on postoperative vital functions in contrast to general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) after the cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study included consecutive term pregnant women delivered by cesarean section (GEA, n = 284; RA, n = 249).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher levels of blood pressure and heart rate, as well as lower levels of pulse oximetry were found for GEA in contrast to RA (p < 0.001). The application of RA presented less side-effects (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RA for cesarean section should be preferred when balancing the risks and benefits for the mother and fetus.</p>","PeriodicalId":13054,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension in Pregnancy","volume":"41 3-4","pages":"198-203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Danka Mostic Stanisic,&nbsp;Nevena Kalezic,&nbsp;Nina Rajovic,&nbsp;Tatjana Ilic Mostic,&nbsp;Jelena Cumic,&nbsp;Tamara Stanisavljevic,&nbsp;Aleksandra Beleslin,&nbsp;Jelena Stulic,&nbsp;Ivana Rudic,&nbsp;Nevena Divac,&nbsp;Natasa Milic,&nbsp;Radan Stojanovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim was to determine the effect of regional anesthesia (RA) on postoperative vital functions in contrast to general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) after the cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study included consecutive term pregnant women delivered by cesarean section (GEA, n = 284; RA, n = 249).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher levels of blood pressure and heart rate, as well as lower levels of pulse oximetry were found for GEA in contrast to RA (p < 0.001). The application of RA presented less side-effects (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RA for cesarean section should be preferred when balancing the risks and benefits for the mother and fetus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension in Pregnancy\",\"volume\":\"41 3-4\",\"pages\":\"198-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension in Pregnancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension in Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:目的是确定区域麻醉(RA)对剖宫产术后生命功能的影响,并与气管内麻醉(GEA)进行比较。方法:前瞻性队列研究纳入连续足月剖宫产孕妇(GEA, n = 284;RA, n = 249)。结果:与RA相比,GEA的血压和心率水平较高,脉搏血氧饱和度较低(p < 0.001)。RA的副作用较小(p < 0.05)。结论:在权衡母胎利弊后,应优先选择RA行剖宫产术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience.

Background: The aim was to determine the effect of regional anesthesia (RA) on postoperative vital functions in contrast to general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) after the cesarean section.

Methods: Prospective cohort study included consecutive term pregnant women delivered by cesarean section (GEA, n = 284; RA, n = 249).

Results: Higher levels of blood pressure and heart rate, as well as lower levels of pulse oximetry were found for GEA in contrast to RA (p < 0.001). The application of RA presented less side-effects (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: RA for cesarean section should be preferred when balancing the risks and benefits for the mother and fetus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension in Pregnancy
Hypertension in Pregnancy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension in Pregnancy is a refereed journal in the English language which publishes data pertaining to human and animal hypertension during gestation. Contributions concerning physiology of circulatory control, pathophysiology, methodology, therapy or any other material relevant to the relationship between elevated blood pressure and pregnancy are acceptable. Published material includes original articles, clinical trials, solicited and unsolicited reviews, editorials, letters, and other material deemed pertinent by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信