针灸干预急诊科急性疼痛试验:一个共识过程。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Acupuncture in Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1177/09645284221076507
Arya Nielsen, Juli Olson, Megan Quesada, Chongbin Zhu, Erin Raskin, Bobbee Vang, Jeannette Painovich, Megan Scott, Vashir J Xiong, Jeffery A Dusek
{"title":"针灸干预急诊科急性疼痛试验:一个共识过程。","authors":"Arya Nielsen, Juli Olson, Megan Quesada, Chongbin Zhu, Erin Raskin, Bobbee Vang, Jeannette Painovich, Megan Scott, Vashir J Xiong, Jeffery A Dusek","doi":"10.1177/09645284221076507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This document describes the consensus process and intervention for a National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded multi-site feasibility study utilizing acupuncture for <b>ACU</b>te pa<b>I</b>n in <b>T</b>he Emergenc<b>Y</b> Department (ACUITY). The acupuncture intervention is designed to be flexible and responsive to the most common Emergency Department (ED) scenarios, including trauma, acute pain of the low back, abdomen and/or musculoskeletal system, renal colic and headache.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids remain a primary treatment for acute ED pain with attendant risk of adverse effects, addiction liability, diversion and death. Effective/safer options for acute pain are needed. Although acupuncture therapy has shown promise for acute pain in the ED alone or in conjunction with usual care, pragmatic trials are needed to obtain definitive and generalizable evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Acupuncture Advisory Panel was convened that included nine acupuncture experts with 5-44 years of experience in practice and 2-16 years of experience in the acute pain care setting. A modified Delphi process was used with provision of a literature review, surveys of our panel members, three online discussions and email discussion as needed. The STandards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials (STRICTA) checklist was used as a guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A responsive acupuncture intervention was agreed on for ACUITY. Session forms were fashioned in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture program to capture essential treatment data, assess fidelity and inform our design for a future pragmatic multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) of acupuncture in the ED, and for use by other future researchers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Development of a responsive manualization intervention provides the appropriate framework for conducting a future, pragmatic, multi-site, definitive RCT of acupuncture in the ED.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04880733 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":7257,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture in Medicine","volume":"40 4","pages":"339-346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acupuncture intervention for acute pain in the Emergency Department trial: a consensus process.\",\"authors\":\"Arya Nielsen, Juli Olson, Megan Quesada, Chongbin Zhu, Erin Raskin, Bobbee Vang, Jeannette Painovich, Megan Scott, Vashir J Xiong, Jeffery A Dusek\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09645284221076507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This document describes the consensus process and intervention for a National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded multi-site feasibility study utilizing acupuncture for <b>ACU</b>te pa<b>I</b>n in <b>T</b>he Emergenc<b>Y</b> Department (ACUITY). The acupuncture intervention is designed to be flexible and responsive to the most common Emergency Department (ED) scenarios, including trauma, acute pain of the low back, abdomen and/or musculoskeletal system, renal colic and headache.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids remain a primary treatment for acute ED pain with attendant risk of adverse effects, addiction liability, diversion and death. Effective/safer options for acute pain are needed. Although acupuncture therapy has shown promise for acute pain in the ED alone or in conjunction with usual care, pragmatic trials are needed to obtain definitive and generalizable evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Acupuncture Advisory Panel was convened that included nine acupuncture experts with 5-44 years of experience in practice and 2-16 years of experience in the acute pain care setting. A modified Delphi process was used with provision of a literature review, surveys of our panel members, three online discussions and email discussion as needed. The STandards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials (STRICTA) checklist was used as a guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A responsive acupuncture intervention was agreed on for ACUITY. Session forms were fashioned in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture program to capture essential treatment data, assess fidelity and inform our design for a future pragmatic multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) of acupuncture in the ED, and for use by other future researchers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Development of a responsive manualization intervention provides the appropriate framework for conducting a future, pragmatic, multi-site, definitive RCT of acupuncture in the ED.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04880733 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acupuncture in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"339-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948001/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acupuncture in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09645284221076507\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09645284221076507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文介绍了一项由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的多地点可行性研究的共识过程和干预措施,该研究利用针灸治疗急诊科急性疼痛(ACUITY)。针灸干预旨在灵活应对最常见的急诊科(ED)情况,包括创伤、腰部、腹部和/或肌肉骨骼系统急性疼痛、肾绞痛和头痛:背景:阿片类药物仍然是治疗急诊室急性疼痛的主要药物,但同时也存在不良反应、成瘾、转移和死亡的风险。我们需要有效/更安全的急性疼痛治疗方案。尽管针灸疗法已显示出单独或与常规护理相结合治疗急诊室急性疼痛的前景,但仍需进行务实的试验,以获得明确和可推广的证据:针灸顾问小组由九名针灸专家组成,他们拥有 5-44 年的针灸实践经验和 2-16 年的急性疼痛治疗经验。我们采用了改良的德尔菲流程,包括文献综述、小组成员调查、三次在线讨论以及必要时的电子邮件讨论。以对照试验中的干预措施报告标准(STRICTA)核对表为指导:结果:ACUITY 的针灸干预得到了一致认可。我们在 REDCap(研究电子数据捕获程序)中制作了疗程表格,用于捕获基本治疗数据、评估忠实性,并为我们未来在急诊室开展针灸的多地点随机对照试验(RCT)的设计提供信息,同时供其他研究人员使用:结论:制定响应性手册干预措施为今后在急诊室开展针灸的务实、多地点、确定性随机对照试验提供了适当的框架:NCT04880733(ClinicalTrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acupuncture intervention for acute pain in the Emergency Department trial: a consensus process.

Purpose: This document describes the consensus process and intervention for a National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded multi-site feasibility study utilizing acupuncture for ACUte paIn in The EmergencY Department (ACUITY). The acupuncture intervention is designed to be flexible and responsive to the most common Emergency Department (ED) scenarios, including trauma, acute pain of the low back, abdomen and/or musculoskeletal system, renal colic and headache.

Background: Opioids remain a primary treatment for acute ED pain with attendant risk of adverse effects, addiction liability, diversion and death. Effective/safer options for acute pain are needed. Although acupuncture therapy has shown promise for acute pain in the ED alone or in conjunction with usual care, pragmatic trials are needed to obtain definitive and generalizable evidence.

Methods: An Acupuncture Advisory Panel was convened that included nine acupuncture experts with 5-44 years of experience in practice and 2-16 years of experience in the acute pain care setting. A modified Delphi process was used with provision of a literature review, surveys of our panel members, three online discussions and email discussion as needed. The STandards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials (STRICTA) checklist was used as a guide.

Results: A responsive acupuncture intervention was agreed on for ACUITY. Session forms were fashioned in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture program to capture essential treatment data, assess fidelity and inform our design for a future pragmatic multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) of acupuncture in the ED, and for use by other future researchers.

Conclusion: Development of a responsive manualization intervention provides the appropriate framework for conducting a future, pragmatic, multi-site, definitive RCT of acupuncture in the ED.

Trial registration number: NCT04880733 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acupuncture in Medicine
Acupuncture in Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acupuncture in Medicine aims to promote the scientific understanding of acupuncture and related treatments by publishing scientific investigations of their effectiveness and modes of action as well as articles on their use in health services and clinical practice. Acupuncture in Medicine uses the Western understanding of neurophysiology and anatomy to interpret the effects of acupuncture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信