Niamh McCombe, Jake Bamrah, Jose M. Sanchez-Bornot, David P. Finn, Paula L. McClean, KongFatt Wong-Lin, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)
{"title":"基于聚类标记的图神经网络对异构数据的阿尔茨海默病分类","authors":"Niamh McCombe, Jake Bamrah, Jose M. Sanchez-Bornot, David P. Finn, Paula L. McClean, KongFatt Wong-Lin, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)","doi":"10.1049/htl2.12037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis do not always correlate reliably with cognitive symptoms, making clinical diagnosis inconsistent. In this study, the performance of a graphical neural network (GNN) classifier based on data-driven diagnostic classes from unsupervised clustering on heterogeneous data is compared to the performance of a classifier using clinician diagnosis as an outcome. Unsupervised clustering on tau-positron emission tomography (PET) and cognitive and functional assessment data was performed. Five clusters embedded in a non-linear uniform manifold approximation and project (UMAP) space were identified. The individual clusters revealed specific feature characteristics with respect to clinical diagnosis of AD, gender, family history, age, and underlying neurological risk factors (NRFs). In particular, one cluster comprised mainly diagnosed AD cases. All cases within this cluster were re-labelled AD cases. The re-labelled cases are characterized by high cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta (CSF Aβ) levels at a younger age, even though Aβ data was not used for clustering. A GNN model was trained using the re-labelled data with a multiclass area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 95.2%, higher than the AUC of a GNN trained on clinician diagnosis (91.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Overall, our work suggests that more objective cluster-based diagnostic labels combined with GNN classification may have value in clinical risk stratification and diagnosis of AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":37474,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Technology Letters","volume":"9 6","pages":"102-109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster-based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data\",\"authors\":\"Niamh McCombe, Jake Bamrah, Jose M. Sanchez-Bornot, David P. Finn, Paula L. McClean, KongFatt Wong-Lin, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/htl2.12037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis do not always correlate reliably with cognitive symptoms, making clinical diagnosis inconsistent. In this study, the performance of a graphical neural network (GNN) classifier based on data-driven diagnostic classes from unsupervised clustering on heterogeneous data is compared to the performance of a classifier using clinician diagnosis as an outcome. Unsupervised clustering on tau-positron emission tomography (PET) and cognitive and functional assessment data was performed. Five clusters embedded in a non-linear uniform manifold approximation and project (UMAP) space were identified. The individual clusters revealed specific feature characteristics with respect to clinical diagnosis of AD, gender, family history, age, and underlying neurological risk factors (NRFs). In particular, one cluster comprised mainly diagnosed AD cases. All cases within this cluster were re-labelled AD cases. The re-labelled cases are characterized by high cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta (CSF Aβ) levels at a younger age, even though Aβ data was not used for clustering. A GNN model was trained using the re-labelled data with a multiclass area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 95.2%, higher than the AUC of a GNN trained on clinician diagnosis (91.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Overall, our work suggests that more objective cluster-based diagnostic labels combined with GNN classification may have value in clinical risk stratification and diagnosis of AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Technology Letters\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"102-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731537/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Technology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/htl2.12037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Technology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/htl2.12037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断的生物标志物并不总是与认知症状可靠地相关,使得临床诊断不一致。在这项研究中,基于数据驱动诊断类的图形神经网络(GNN)分类器的性能与使用临床医生诊断作为结果的分类器的性能进行了比较。对tau-正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和认知功能评估数据进行无监督聚类。在非线性均匀流形逼近和项目(UMAP)空间中识别了5个簇。个体聚类在AD的临床诊断、性别、家族史、年龄和潜在神经危险因素(NRFs)方面显示出特定的特征特征。特别是,其中一组主要由诊断为AD的病例组成。该群集中的所有病例均被重新标记为AD病例。重新标记的病例的特点是在较年轻的年龄时脑脊液淀粉样蛋白β (CSF a β)水平较高,尽管a β数据未用于聚类。使用重新标记的数据训练的GNN模型的多类别曲线下面积(AUC)为95.2%,高于临床医生诊断训练的GNN模型的AUC (91.7%;p = 0.02)。总的来说,我们的工作表明,更客观的基于聚类的诊断标签结合GNN分类可能在AD的临床风险分层和诊断中具有价值。
Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster-based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data
Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis do not always correlate reliably with cognitive symptoms, making clinical diagnosis inconsistent. In this study, the performance of a graphical neural network (GNN) classifier based on data-driven diagnostic classes from unsupervised clustering on heterogeneous data is compared to the performance of a classifier using clinician diagnosis as an outcome. Unsupervised clustering on tau-positron emission tomography (PET) and cognitive and functional assessment data was performed. Five clusters embedded in a non-linear uniform manifold approximation and project (UMAP) space were identified. The individual clusters revealed specific feature characteristics with respect to clinical diagnosis of AD, gender, family history, age, and underlying neurological risk factors (NRFs). In particular, one cluster comprised mainly diagnosed AD cases. All cases within this cluster were re-labelled AD cases. The re-labelled cases are characterized by high cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta (CSF Aβ) levels at a younger age, even though Aβ data was not used for clustering. A GNN model was trained using the re-labelled data with a multiclass area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 95.2%, higher than the AUC of a GNN trained on clinician diagnosis (91.7%; p = 0.02). Overall, our work suggests that more objective cluster-based diagnostic labels combined with GNN classification may have value in clinical risk stratification and diagnosis of AD.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare Technology Letters aims to bring together an audience of biomedical and electrical engineers, physical and computer scientists, and mathematicians to enable the exchange of the latest ideas and advances through rapid online publication of original healthcare technology research. Major themes of the journal include (but are not limited to): Major technological/methodological areas: Biomedical signal processing Biomedical imaging and image processing Bioinstrumentation (sensors, wearable technologies, etc) Biomedical informatics Major application areas: Cardiovascular and respiratory systems engineering Neural engineering, neuromuscular systems Rehabilitation engineering Bio-robotics, surgical planning and biomechanics Therapeutic and diagnostic systems, devices and technologies Clinical engineering Healthcare information systems, telemedicine, mHealth.