腘窝动脉瘤置换术后的早期结果。

Elias Noory, Tanja Böhme, Ulrich Beschorner, Börries Jacques, Karlheinz Bürgelin, Christina Zürn, Thomas Zeller
{"title":"腘窝动脉瘤置换术后的早期结果。","authors":"Elias Noory, Tanja Böhme, Ulrich Beschorner, Börries Jacques, Karlheinz Bürgelin, Christina Zürn, Thomas Zeller","doi":"10.26502/fccm.92920298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate safety and efficacy of endoprosthesis implantation for the exclusion of popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA). Methods: Elective asymptomatic patients with aneurysm > 20 mm and symptomatic patients with endovascular therapy of PAA were included. The proportion of patients with critical limb ischemia (presence of rest pain or tissue loss) was high at 32.1%, 21.6% of the patients had acute ischemia with symptoms persisting shorter than 14 days. The primary study endpoint was the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success, periinterventional adverse events, primary patency at 6, 12 and 24 months, TLR rate at 24 months, predictors on reintervention, change in in clinical symptoms using the Rutherford-Becker classification (RBC), amputation and mortality rate. One hundred thirty-four patients (68.3±10.6 years, 88.8% male) were treated with a Viabahn® endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore & Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA). Results: The average aneurysm diameter was 2.5±0.87 cm. In 41%, occlusion of the aneurysm was present. TLR rate was 31.3% and 38.8% after 12 and 24 months, respectively. Primary patency rates were 69.1%, 52.3% and 42.6% at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed age as a predictor of reintervention and in the multivariable analysis it was treatment with lysis. An improvement in RBC was seen at all-time points. Two major amputations (1.5%) were performed and the mortality rate at 24 months was 5.2%. Conclusion: Primary patency rate after endovascular exclusion of PAA is low. However, limb salvage rate is high.","PeriodicalId":72523,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","volume":"6 6","pages":"550-557"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Results after Exclusion of Popliteal Aneurysms with an Endoprosthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Elias Noory, Tanja Böhme, Ulrich Beschorner, Börries Jacques, Karlheinz Bürgelin, Christina Zürn, Thomas Zeller\",\"doi\":\"10.26502/fccm.92920298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To evaluate safety and efficacy of endoprosthesis implantation for the exclusion of popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA). Methods: Elective asymptomatic patients with aneurysm > 20 mm and symptomatic patients with endovascular therapy of PAA were included. The proportion of patients with critical limb ischemia (presence of rest pain or tissue loss) was high at 32.1%, 21.6% of the patients had acute ischemia with symptoms persisting shorter than 14 days. The primary study endpoint was the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success, periinterventional adverse events, primary patency at 6, 12 and 24 months, TLR rate at 24 months, predictors on reintervention, change in in clinical symptoms using the Rutherford-Becker classification (RBC), amputation and mortality rate. One hundred thirty-four patients (68.3±10.6 years, 88.8% male) were treated with a Viabahn® endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore & Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA). Results: The average aneurysm diameter was 2.5±0.87 cm. In 41%, occlusion of the aneurysm was present. TLR rate was 31.3% and 38.8% after 12 and 24 months, respectively. Primary patency rates were 69.1%, 52.3% and 42.6% at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed age as a predictor of reintervention and in the multivariable analysis it was treatment with lysis. An improvement in RBC was seen at all-time points. Two major amputations (1.5%) were performed and the mortality rate at 24 months was 5.2%. Conclusion: Primary patency rate after endovascular exclusion of PAA is low. However, limb salvage rate is high.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"550-557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912976/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价假体植入术治疗腘动脉动脉瘤(PAA)的安全性和有效性。方法:选择无症状的动脉瘤> 20mm患者和有症状的血管内治疗PAA患者。重度肢体缺血(存在静息痛或组织丢失)的患者比例高达32.1%,21.6%的患者为急性缺血,症状持续时间短于14天。主要研究终点是12个月时靶病变血运重建(TLR)率。次要终点包括技术成功、介入期不良事件、6个月、12个月和24个月的原发性通畅、24个月的TLR率、再干预的预测因子、使用Rutherford-Becker分类(RBC)的临床症状改变、截肢和死亡率。134例患者(68.3±10.6岁,88.8%男性)接受了Viabahn®内假体治疗(W.L. Gore & Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA)。结果:动脉瘤平均直径为2.5±0.87 cm。41%的患者存在动脉瘤闭塞。术后12个月TLR为31.3%,24个月TLR为38.8%。6个月、12个月和24个月时,原发性通畅率分别为69.1%、52.3%和42.6%。单因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄是再干预的预测因子,多因素分析显示,年龄是再干预的预测因子。RBC在所有时间点均有所改善。2例主要截肢(1.5%),24个月死亡率为5.2%。结论:血管内排除PAA术后一期通畅率低。但残肢保留率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Early Results after Exclusion of Popliteal Aneurysms with an Endoprosthesis.

Early Results after Exclusion of Popliteal Aneurysms with an Endoprosthesis.

Early Results after Exclusion of Popliteal Aneurysms with an Endoprosthesis.

Early Results after Exclusion of Popliteal Aneurysms with an Endoprosthesis.
Objectives: To evaluate safety and efficacy of endoprosthesis implantation for the exclusion of popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA). Methods: Elective asymptomatic patients with aneurysm > 20 mm and symptomatic patients with endovascular therapy of PAA were included. The proportion of patients with critical limb ischemia (presence of rest pain or tissue loss) was high at 32.1%, 21.6% of the patients had acute ischemia with symptoms persisting shorter than 14 days. The primary study endpoint was the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success, periinterventional adverse events, primary patency at 6, 12 and 24 months, TLR rate at 24 months, predictors on reintervention, change in in clinical symptoms using the Rutherford-Becker classification (RBC), amputation and mortality rate. One hundred thirty-four patients (68.3±10.6 years, 88.8% male) were treated with a Viabahn® endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore & Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA). Results: The average aneurysm diameter was 2.5±0.87 cm. In 41%, occlusion of the aneurysm was present. TLR rate was 31.3% and 38.8% after 12 and 24 months, respectively. Primary patency rates were 69.1%, 52.3% and 42.6% at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed age as a predictor of reintervention and in the multivariable analysis it was treatment with lysis. An improvement in RBC was seen at all-time points. Two major amputations (1.5%) were performed and the mortality rate at 24 months was 5.2%. Conclusion: Primary patency rate after endovascular exclusion of PAA is low. However, limb salvage rate is high.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信