腰椎退行性疾病手术后仰卧位和侧卧位疼痛和不适的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
Yasuchika Aoki , Makoto Suzuki , Hiroshi Takahashi , Arata Nakajima , Masato Sonobe , Toshiaki Kotani , Takayuki Nakajima , Yusuke Sato , Masahiro Inoue , Junya Saito , Masaki Norimoto , Yawara Eguchi , Sumihisa Orita , Seiji Ohtori , Koichi Nakagawa
{"title":"腰椎退行性疾病手术后仰卧位和侧卧位疼痛和不适的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究","authors":"Yasuchika Aoki ,&nbsp;Makoto Suzuki ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Takahashi ,&nbsp;Arata Nakajima ,&nbsp;Masato Sonobe ,&nbsp;Toshiaki Kotani ,&nbsp;Takayuki Nakajima ,&nbsp;Yusuke Sato ,&nbsp;Masahiro Inoue ,&nbsp;Junya Saito ,&nbsp;Masaki Norimoto ,&nbsp;Yawara Eguchi ,&nbsp;Sumihisa Orita ,&nbsp;Seiji Ohtori ,&nbsp;Koichi Nakagawa","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2022.100959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>To compare postoperative pain and discomfort between supine and lateral positions after lumbar surgery, a prospective randomized controlled study was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-three patients with lumbar degenerative disease<span>, treated by decompression (n = 23) or fusion surgery (n = 20), were randomly assigned to be placed in either the supine (supine group: n = 21) or lateral (lateral group: n = 22) position postoperatively, and asked to maintain their position until a day after the surgery. Postoperative back pain and discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS], 0–100 mm) and the number of patients who could maintain their position were examined.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The VAS scores for back pain (<u>supine</u>: 64.9 ± 22.0, <u>lateral:</u> 55.7 ± 21.4) showed no significant difference between the positions. However, the supine group showed significantly more severe discomfort (75.6 ± 15.7) than the lateral group (64.9 ± 15.7, p = 0.039). Significantly fewer patients maintained their position in the supine group (28.2%) than in the lateral group (68.2%; p = 0.022). Among patients who underwent fusion surgery, significantly fewer patients maintained their position in the supine group (10.0%) than those in the lateral group (60.0%, p = 0.029).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Postoperative discomfort was significantly reduced in the lateral position than in the supine position; thus, the lateral position is more suitable after lumbar surgery in terms of postoperative discomfort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100959"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of pain and discomfort in supine and lateral positions after surgery for lumbar degenerative disease: A prospective randomized controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Yasuchika Aoki ,&nbsp;Makoto Suzuki ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Takahashi ,&nbsp;Arata Nakajima ,&nbsp;Masato Sonobe ,&nbsp;Toshiaki Kotani ,&nbsp;Takayuki Nakajima ,&nbsp;Yusuke Sato ,&nbsp;Masahiro Inoue ,&nbsp;Junya Saito ,&nbsp;Masaki Norimoto ,&nbsp;Yawara Eguchi ,&nbsp;Sumihisa Orita ,&nbsp;Seiji Ohtori ,&nbsp;Koichi Nakagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijotn.2022.100959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>To compare postoperative pain and discomfort between supine and lateral positions after lumbar surgery, a prospective randomized controlled study was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-three patients with lumbar degenerative disease<span>, treated by decompression (n = 23) or fusion surgery (n = 20), were randomly assigned to be placed in either the supine (supine group: n = 21) or lateral (lateral group: n = 22) position postoperatively, and asked to maintain their position until a day after the surgery. Postoperative back pain and discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS], 0–100 mm) and the number of patients who could maintain their position were examined.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The VAS scores for back pain (<u>supine</u>: 64.9 ± 22.0, <u>lateral:</u> 55.7 ± 21.4) showed no significant difference between the positions. However, the supine group showed significantly more severe discomfort (75.6 ± 15.7) than the lateral group (64.9 ± 15.7, p = 0.039). Significantly fewer patients maintained their position in the supine group (28.2%) than in the lateral group (68.2%; p = 0.022). Among patients who underwent fusion surgery, significantly fewer patients maintained their position in the supine group (10.0%) than those in the lateral group (60.0%, p = 0.029).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Postoperative discomfort was significantly reduced in the lateral position than in the supine position; thus, the lateral position is more suitable after lumbar surgery in terms of postoperative discomfort.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100959\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124122000399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124122000399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了比较腰椎手术后仰卧位和侧卧位的术后疼痛和不适,进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究。方法43例腰椎退行性疾病患者均行减压手术(n = 23)或融合手术(n = 20),术后随机分为仰卧位(仰卧位组:n = 21)和侧卧位(侧卧位组:n = 22)两组,并保持该体位至术后1天。检查术后背部疼痛和不适(视觉模拟量表[VAS], 0 ~ 100 mm)及能保持体位的患者人数。结果两组患者背部疼痛VAS评分(仰卧位:64.9±22.0,侧卧位:55.7±21.4)差异无统计学意义。仰卧位组(75.6±15.7)明显高于侧卧位组(64.9±15.7,p = 0.039)。仰卧位组(28.2%)明显少于侧卧位组(68.2%);p = 0.022)。在接受融合手术的患者中,仰卧位组保持体位的患者(10.0%)明显少于侧卧位组(60.0%,p = 0.029)。结论侧卧位术后不适感较仰卧位明显减轻;因此,就术后不适而言,侧卧位更适合腰椎手术后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of pain and discomfort in supine and lateral positions after surgery for lumbar degenerative disease: A prospective randomized controlled study

Introduction

To compare postoperative pain and discomfort between supine and lateral positions after lumbar surgery, a prospective randomized controlled study was performed.

Methods

Forty-three patients with lumbar degenerative disease, treated by decompression (n = 23) or fusion surgery (n = 20), were randomly assigned to be placed in either the supine (supine group: n = 21) or lateral (lateral group: n = 22) position postoperatively, and asked to maintain their position until a day after the surgery. Postoperative back pain and discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS], 0–100 mm) and the number of patients who could maintain their position were examined.

Results

The VAS scores for back pain (supine: 64.9 ± 22.0, lateral: 55.7 ± 21.4) showed no significant difference between the positions. However, the supine group showed significantly more severe discomfort (75.6 ± 15.7) than the lateral group (64.9 ± 15.7, p = 0.039). Significantly fewer patients maintained their position in the supine group (28.2%) than in the lateral group (68.2%; p = 0.022). Among patients who underwent fusion surgery, significantly fewer patients maintained their position in the supine group (10.0%) than those in the lateral group (60.0%, p = 0.029).

Conclusion

Postoperative discomfort was significantly reduced in the lateral position than in the supine position; thus, the lateral position is more suitable after lumbar surgery in terms of postoperative discomfort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信