社区科学是对新自由主义科学实践的抵制。

IF 1.7 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-27 DOI:10.1089/env.2021.0099
Jennifer S Carrera, Sarah Bailey, Ronnie Wiggins, Cynthia Watkins, Laura Sullivan, Melissa Mays, Kent Key
{"title":"社区科学是对新自由主义科学实践的抵制。","authors":"Jennifer S Carrera, Sarah Bailey, Ronnie Wiggins, Cynthia Watkins, Laura Sullivan, Melissa Mays, Kent Key","doi":"10.1089/env.2021.0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flint is a site of resistance to neoliberalism specifically because of the actions of Flint residents. The impacts of this organizing are due, in part, to sustained efforts to reimagine how communities can contribute to scientific knowledge production. We argue that Flint residents' efforts to advance a community-driven research (CDR) agenda represent an important and successful resistance to neoliberal scientific regulatory practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present Flint as a case study in CDR as a form of resistance. This article uses participatory observation within community-based research and draws from the personal experiences of the research team as long-term and lifelong residents of Flint who were actively involved in different aspects of community mobilizing during the water crisis.</p><p><strong>Case study: </strong>We highlight Flint's rich and sustained community-based participatory research history, resident-led data collection efforts to assess the environmental and health conditions, a resident-led effort to tell the story of the water crisis from the residents' perspective, and recent efforts to develop and advance a CDR model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Community-led research efforts in Flint follow Leitner <i>et al.</i>'s typology of contesting neoliberalism through opting in to neoliberal science to advance community needs, collecting data to support direct opposition through protest and mobilization, creating alternative knowledge frames, and using CDR to disengage from the traditional scientific model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through CDR, Flint residents work in direct resistance to the tacit integration of neoliberal values into science and alternatively advance community organizing as a key aspect of science toward environmental justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community Science as Resistance to Neoliberal Scientific Praxis.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer S Carrera, Sarah Bailey, Ronnie Wiggins, Cynthia Watkins, Laura Sullivan, Melissa Mays, Kent Key\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/env.2021.0099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flint is a site of resistance to neoliberalism specifically because of the actions of Flint residents. The impacts of this organizing are due, in part, to sustained efforts to reimagine how communities can contribute to scientific knowledge production. We argue that Flint residents' efforts to advance a community-driven research (CDR) agenda represent an important and successful resistance to neoliberal scientific regulatory practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present Flint as a case study in CDR as a form of resistance. This article uses participatory observation within community-based research and draws from the personal experiences of the research team as long-term and lifelong residents of Flint who were actively involved in different aspects of community mobilizing during the water crisis.</p><p><strong>Case study: </strong>We highlight Flint's rich and sustained community-based participatory research history, resident-led data collection efforts to assess the environmental and health conditions, a resident-led effort to tell the story of the water crisis from the residents' perspective, and recent efforts to develop and advance a CDR model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Community-led research efforts in Flint follow Leitner <i>et al.</i>'s typology of contesting neoliberalism through opting in to neoliberal science to advance community needs, collecting data to support direct opposition through protest and mobilization, creating alternative knowledge frames, and using CDR to disengage from the traditional scientific model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through CDR, Flint residents work in direct resistance to the tacit integration of neoliberal values into science and alternatively advance community organizing as a key aspect of science toward environmental justice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900630/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2021.0099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2021.0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于弗林特居民的行动,弗林特成为抵制新自由主义的地方。这种组织活动之所以产生影响,部分原因在于他们持续努力重新构想社区如何为科学知识的生产做出贡献。我们认为,弗林特居民推进社区驱动研究(CDR)议程的努力是对新自由主义科学监管实践的一次重要而成功的抵制:我们将弗林特作为一个案例研究,将社区驱动研究作为一种抵制形式。本文在以社区为基础的研究中采用了参与式观察法,并借鉴了研究团队作为弗林特市长期和终身居民的个人经验,他们在水危机期间积极参与了社区动员的各个方面:案例研究:我们重点介绍了弗林特丰富而持续的社区参与式研究历史、居民主导的数据收集工作以评估环境和健康状况、居民主导的从居民角度讲述水危机故事的工作,以及最近开发和推进社区参与式研究模式的工作:讨论:弗林特市由社区主导的研究工作遵循了莱特纳等人提出的类型学观点,即通过选择新自由主义科学来推进社区需求,收集数据以支持通过抗议和动员来直接反对新自由主义,创建替代知识框架,以及使用 CDR 来脱离传统的科学模式,从而对新自由主义提出质疑:通过 CDR,弗林特居民直接抵制了新自由主义价值观与科学的默契结合,并将社区组织作为实现环境正义科学的一个关键方面加以推进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community Science as Resistance to Neoliberal Scientific Praxis.

Background: Flint is a site of resistance to neoliberalism specifically because of the actions of Flint residents. The impacts of this organizing are due, in part, to sustained efforts to reimagine how communities can contribute to scientific knowledge production. We argue that Flint residents' efforts to advance a community-driven research (CDR) agenda represent an important and successful resistance to neoliberal scientific regulatory practices.

Methods: We present Flint as a case study in CDR as a form of resistance. This article uses participatory observation within community-based research and draws from the personal experiences of the research team as long-term and lifelong residents of Flint who were actively involved in different aspects of community mobilizing during the water crisis.

Case study: We highlight Flint's rich and sustained community-based participatory research history, resident-led data collection efforts to assess the environmental and health conditions, a resident-led effort to tell the story of the water crisis from the residents' perspective, and recent efforts to develop and advance a CDR model.

Discussion: Community-led research efforts in Flint follow Leitner et al.'s typology of contesting neoliberalism through opting in to neoliberal science to advance community needs, collecting data to support direct opposition through protest and mobilization, creating alternative knowledge frames, and using CDR to disengage from the traditional scientific model.

Conclusions: Through CDR, Flint residents work in direct resistance to the tacit integration of neoliberal values into science and alternatively advance community organizing as a key aspect of science toward environmental justice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Environmental Justice, a quarterly peer-reviewed journal, is the central forum for the research, debate, and discussion of the equitable treatment and involvement of all people, especially minority and low-income populations, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The Journal explores the adverse and disparate environmental burden impacting marginalized populations and communities all over the world. Environmental Justice draws upon the expertise and perspectives of all parties involved in environmental justice struggles: communities, industry, academia, government, and nonprofit organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信