衡量低生育率背景下就业不确定性对生育率的影响:现有措施概述。

IF 2.1 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Genus Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1186/s41118-023-00185-x
Brian Buh
{"title":"衡量低生育率背景下就业不确定性对生育率的影响:现有措施概述。","authors":"Brian Buh","doi":"10.1186/s41118-023-00185-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous studies aim to connect negative fertility desires and outcomes with employment conditions deemed to be uncertain. However, there is a lack of consensus about how to define, conceptualise, and measure employment uncertainty. This paper considers issues surrounding the conceptualisation of employment uncertainty. It then reviews existing measures of employment uncertainty in the context of fertility decisions. Finally, it raises considerations about their use. While some aspects of employment uncertainty are well studied, there are still gaps between theory and empirical evidence. Researchers should be aware of existing population heterogeneity, contextual factors, and model selection when considering their conceptualisation of employment uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":35741,"journal":{"name":"Genus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the effect of employment uncertainty on fertility in low-fertility contexts: an overview of existing measures.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Buh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41118-023-00185-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Numerous studies aim to connect negative fertility desires and outcomes with employment conditions deemed to be uncertain. However, there is a lack of consensus about how to define, conceptualise, and measure employment uncertainty. This paper considers issues surrounding the conceptualisation of employment uncertainty. It then reviews existing measures of employment uncertainty in the context of fertility decisions. Finally, it raises considerations about their use. While some aspects of employment uncertainty are well studied, there are still gaps between theory and empirical evidence. Researchers should be aware of existing population heterogeneity, contextual factors, and model selection when considering their conceptualisation of employment uncertainty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904270/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-023-00185-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-023-00185-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多研究旨在将消极的生育意愿和结果与被视为不确定的就业条件联系起来。然而,在如何定义、概念化和衡量就业不确定性方面还缺乏共识。本文探讨了有关就业不确定性概念化的问题。然后,本文回顾了生育决策中就业不确定性的现有测量方法。最后,本文提出了对其使用的考虑。尽管对就业不确定性的某些方面进行了深入研究,但理论与经验证据之间仍存在差距。研究人员在考虑就业不确定性的概念时,应注意现有的人口异质性、背景因素和模型选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the effect of employment uncertainty on fertility in low-fertility contexts: an overview of existing measures.

Numerous studies aim to connect negative fertility desires and outcomes with employment conditions deemed to be uncertain. However, there is a lack of consensus about how to define, conceptualise, and measure employment uncertainty. This paper considers issues surrounding the conceptualisation of employment uncertainty. It then reviews existing measures of employment uncertainty in the context of fertility decisions. Finally, it raises considerations about their use. While some aspects of employment uncertainty are well studied, there are still gaps between theory and empirical evidence. Researchers should be aware of existing population heterogeneity, contextual factors, and model selection when considering their conceptualisation of employment uncertainty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genus
Genus Social Sciences-Demography
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信